The Orson Empire wrote:Do our Senators have to know that language? Because I am just going to type in English. Sorry, but I'm not good at learning other languages.
No, it's like Welsh in Wales. Most people just speak english.
Advertisement
by Britcan » Thu May 30, 2013 2:19 pm
The Orson Empire wrote:Do our Senators have to know that language? Because I am just going to type in English. Sorry, but I'm not good at learning other languages.
by Fulflood » Thu May 30, 2013 2:22 pm
Straight male British apatheist pacifist environmentalist social liberal
by New Waterford » Thu May 30, 2013 2:22 pm
by Glasgia » Thu May 30, 2013 2:23 pm
The Orson Empire wrote:Do our Senators have to know that language? Because I am just going to type in English. Sorry, but I'm not good at learning other languages.
by Rocketvill » Thu May 30, 2013 3:44 pm
by Acro » Thu May 30, 2013 5:59 pm
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 6:24 pm
by TaQud » Thu May 30, 2013 6:25 pm
Belmaria wrote:For any supporters of the Economic Responsibility Act, or for those who just want to learn more about the bill, we have created a new website!
http://nsg-era.webs.com/
by Regnum Dominae » Thu May 30, 2013 6:27 pm
TaQud wrote:Belmaria wrote:For any supporters of the Economic Responsibility Act, or for those who just want to learn more about the bill, we have created a new website!
http://nsg-era.webs.com/
was it really necessary to create a website over 1 act?
by Unicario » Thu May 30, 2013 6:28 pm
by TaQud » Thu May 30, 2013 6:30 pm
Unicario wrote:Am I the only one slightly concerned and annoyed at the fact that there are so many things unmentioned in law that can't be "tried for", yet the reverse argument was used by some of the Senators before?
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 6:31 pm
by Unicario » Thu May 30, 2013 6:32 pm
by TaQud » Thu May 30, 2013 6:33 pm
Unicario wrote:TaQud wrote:can you give some examples or hypotheticals of that?
I'd say back during the time where we argued over natural rights like the freedom of speech, freedom of this, freedom of that before the passing of the Bill of Rights, where Senators like Nepal, etc. argued that since there was no law relating to it, it was not permitted...
But in the recent bombing case, same Senators are arguing that there is no legal way to prosecute these people since there is no legislature mentioning it.
So the question rises -- Is it illegal, yet permitted?
by The Realm of God » Thu May 30, 2013 6:42 pm
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 6:45 pm
The Realm of God wrote:Now we must enforce the ISA, passing it was the easy part.
by Unicario » Thu May 30, 2013 6:46 pm
The Realm of God wrote:Now we must enforce the ISA, passing it was the easy part.
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 6:47 pm
Unicario wrote:The Realm of God wrote:Now we must enforce the ISA, passing it was the easy part.
Have fun with the NIFP. They'd rather die than give up their paramilitaries.
I'd like to state first and foremost, I, Senator Adelaide Kohl, do not support the NIFP's paramilitary force under any circumstance, and did not vote against the ISA...
So if you start making arrests, kindly leave me be.
by The Realm of God » Thu May 30, 2013 6:49 pm
Belmaria wrote:Unicario wrote:
Have fun with the NIFP. They'd rather die than give up their paramilitaries.
I'd like to state first and foremost, I, Senator Adelaide Kohl, do not support the NIFP's paramilitary force under any circumstance, and did not vote against the ISA...
So if you start making arrests, kindly leave me be.
I agree, the NIFP use their paramilitary for intimidation.
by Byzantium Imperial » Thu May 30, 2013 6:51 pm
Belmaria wrote:Unicario wrote:
Have fun with the NIFP. They'd rather die than give up their paramilitaries.
I'd like to state first and foremost, I, Senator Adelaide Kohl, do not support the NIFP's paramilitary force under any circumstance, and did not vote against the ISA...
So if you start making arrests, kindly leave me be.
I agree, the NIFP use their paramilitary for intimidation.
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 6:55 pm
by The Zeonic States » Thu May 30, 2013 6:55 pm
Unicario wrote:The Realm of God wrote:Now we must enforce the ISA, passing it was the easy part.
Have fun with the NIFP. They'd rather die than give up their paramilitaries.
I'd like to state first and foremost, I, Senator Adelaide Kohl, do not support the NIFP's paramilitary force under any circumstance, and did not vote against the ISA...
So if you start making arrests, kindly leave me be.
Belmaria wrote:Unicario wrote:
Have fun with the NIFP. They'd rather die than give up their paramilitaries.
I'd like to state first and foremost, I, Senator Adelaide Kohl, do not support the NIFP's paramilitary force under any circumstance, and did not vote against the ISA...
So if you start making arrests, kindly leave me be.
I agree, the NIFP use their paramilitary for intimidation.
by The Zeonic States » Thu May 30, 2013 6:55 pm
by Belmaria » Thu May 30, 2013 6:56 pm
by Diopolis » Thu May 30, 2013 6:58 pm
The Realm of God wrote:Now we must enforce the ISA, passing it was the easy part.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement