National Imperialist-Freedom Party Headquarters [NSG Senate]

[Eliasonia]

We need some sort of offsite chat or something....

[Prussia-Steinbach]

We need some sort of offsite chat or something....

IRC channel coming right up.

[Yanalia]

The idea is that the extremists on both sides will work together to vote Hath in, at which point he will appoint ministers to represent both sides, and afterward become effectively impotent, correct?

Just trying to work this all out in my head. If this is the plan - assuming the Left will agree - I would fully support it.

I was thinking inactive ministers, preferably independents.

[Yanalia]

I'm motioning to extend the vote so we have more time to reach consensus.

[Eliasonia]

I'm motioning to extend the vote so we have more time to reach consensus.

I don't think it has started yet.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

The idea is that the extremists on both sides will work together to vote Hath in, at which point he will appoint ministers to represent both sides, and afterward become effectively impotent, correct?

Just trying to work this all out in my head. If this is the plan - assuming the Left will agree - I would fully support it.

I was thinking inactive ministers, preferably independents.

But is this just to fuck with Wolfmanne, or to actually advance our own interests?

[Yanalia]

I'm motioning to extend the vote so we have more time to reach consensus.

I don't think it has started yet.

It just needs five, no?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

The NIFP's IRC channel: http://client00.chat.mibbit.com/?channe ... .esper.net

Hath, you should add this to the OP. Until I create our new one, which might actually be farther in the future than originally thought.

[Eliasonia]

I don't think it has started yet.

It just needs five, no?

10 I think... judging by wolf's post when the "seconds" reached 4.

[Yanalia]

It just needs five, no?

10 I think... judging by wolf's post when the "seconds" reached 4.

They changed it to 10, right. Forgot.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

10 I think... judging by wolf's post when the "seconds" reached 4.

They changed it to 10, right. Forgot.

And it has seven, correct?

Should I and others begin seconding the motion? Do we want Hath in?

[Yanalia]

The vote started. Do we have Hath's promise to not use his PM powers and appoint inactive Senators?

[Unicario]

The TR are doing a conscious vote.

[Yanalia]

Hath's off to a better start than Geil at least.

[Mishmahig]

Hath's off to a better start than Geil at least.

A start, but not a finish.

I notice some libertarians in opposition. Perhaps the NIFP or the USLP can persuade them to abstain or support?

[Eliasonia]

Hath's off to a better start than Geil at least.

A start, but not a finish.

I notice some libertarians in opposition. Perhaps the NIFP or the USLP can persuade them to abstain or support?

They'd probably be more inclined to listen to the USLP over us, I'll see if I can do anything with Galt's Gulch.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

A start, but not a finish.

I notice some libertarians in opposition. Perhaps the NIFP or the USLP can persuade them to abstain or support?

They'd probably be more inclined to listen to the USLP over us, I'll see if I can do anything with Galt's Gulch.

I've been encouraging my... friends to vote in favour of Hath as PM. I have a friend or to over with the Objectivists as well, I'll see what I can do.

[Yanalia]

I think Wolf is just going to remove his nomination at the end of the vote. This is just a way to waste 48 hours. Sad.

[The Nihilistic view]

I think Wolf is just going to remove his nomination at the end of the vote. This is just a way to waste 48 hours. Sad.

We will then launch a motion to impeach him. Make sure he knows this.

[Eliasonia]

I think Wolf is just going to remove his nomination at the end of the vote. This is just a way to waste 48 hours. Sad.

judging from Nepal's response to Beta over in the Coalition thread, I believe you're right.

[Chetssaland]

I think Wolf is just going to remove his nomination at the end of the vote. This is just a way to waste 48 hours. Sad.

We will then launch a motion to impeach him. Make sure he knows this.

Is that an impeachable offense? I'm asking because I doubt it, but I don't know.

[Yanalia]

We will then launch a motion to impeach him. Make sure he knows this.

Is that an impeachable offense? I'm asking because I doubt it, but I don't know.

The president can be removed for any reason, as long as 2/3 of the Senate agrees.

[Great Nepal]

The president can be removed for any reason, as long as 2/3 of the Senate agrees.

Wrong. He can only be removed for official misconduct or disability.

We will then launch a motion to impeach him. Make sure he knows this.

Is that an impeachable offense? I'm asking because I doubt it, but I don't know.

Lets assume it is. Then, you would need to get 252 active and voting for it.

Oh and I seriously doubt this is just fillbuster.

[Yankee Empire]

So what is currently on our agenda?

[The Nihilistic view]

The president can be removed for any reason, as long as 2/3 of the Senate agrees.

Wrong. He can only be removed for official misconduct or disability.

Is that an impeachable offense? I'm asking because I doubt it, but I don't know.

Lets assume it is. Then, you would need to get 252 active and voting for it.

Oh and I seriously doubt this is just fillbuster.

Its not a filibuster but it wont succeed because the law is to silly but it would be my genuine wish.