Repetition of points in essay.
-9,001 marks.
D- See me after class.
Advertisement

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:19 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:21 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:24 pm

by Ragnarum » Tue May 07, 2013 1:26 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:27 pm

by The Zeonic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:29 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:32 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 1:39 pm

by Ragnarum » Tue May 07, 2013 1:46 pm
Hathradic States wrote:WE ARE ENFORCING A DOUBLE-LINE WHIP AGAINST THE BUSINESS ACT IN THE SENATE

by Yankee Empire » Tue May 07, 2013 3:09 pm

by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue May 07, 2013 3:33 pm

by Castille de Italia » Tue May 07, 2013 3:36 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 4:06 pm
Castille de Italia wrote:I'd like to join this party. Pruss invited me.
Also like to propose legislation similar to Patriot Act, told that this would be the place...

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 4:07 pm

by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue May 07, 2013 4:10 pm

by Castille de Italia » Tue May 07, 2013 4:15 pm

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 4:15 pm

by Yankee Empire » Tue May 07, 2013 4:30 pm


by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 4:33 pm

by DuThaal Craftworld » Tue May 07, 2013 4:58 pm
Nua Corda wrote:Read the rest of the quote by clicking the 'wrote' button.

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 5:02 pm
DuThaal Craftworld wrote:Seeing as the only current divide we have on the Secret Police bill is how hard it will be to erase it’s mention from history, I’m just gonna go ahead and submit the first draft for what is basically a more detailed 2nd Amendment.Statement The right of the people to possess, use and carry firearms shall not be infringed by any state, federal or other governmental authority. And while the right of the people to bear low-power explosives/artillery may be infringed, it shall not be prohibited in most circumstances*. Also not infringed is the right of the people to affix these weapons upon any frame that they wish, so long as they have the consent of the object’s owner.
Definitions; Defines firearms as any weapon with a projectile diameter of less than six point three five (6.35) centimeters, a projectile length of less than ten point one six (10.16) centimeters and utilizes a short combustion cycle to propel said projectile out of the weapon and towards a target. These may take the form of pistols, rifles, shotguns and large ‘sniper’ rifles. If the ammunition carries an explosive, poisonous or otherwise exotic payload the ammunition is to be governed by a seperate piece of legislation.
Defines low-power explosives as any explosive material with an explosive force of less than ten kilograms (22 pounds) when shaped into a regular cube measuring 1cm3 before detonation. Upon and after detonation it may not leave behind any harmful chemical, biological or radiological residue/effects upon the environment.
Defines artillery, for the purpose of this bill, to be any weapon with a projectile diameter above 6.35 centimeters.
Defines the circumstances under which a member of the populace’s right to bear low power exposives and artillery as legal charges. Unless otherwise stated, instant confiscation, a ban from owning such weapons again and selling the confiscated materials back onto the free market is the penalty. The legal charges applicable are as such; conspiracy to commit murder (with the weapon(s)), manslaughter (four month suspension, official training upon proper use), murder (with the weapon(s)), armed robbery (with the weapon(s)), rape (wherein the weapon(s) were used to coerce the raped party) or property destruction (with the weapon(s)).
Furthermore it shall take no less than a vote of 75% confidence at the minimum in order to repeal this bill.
Anything I screwed up monumentally with? Should there be tighter regulations on fully automatic weaponry (which, according to this draft, are governed the same as semi-auto weapons), anything anyone within this party would like to add/take away? Loop holes?

by Lemanrussland » Tue May 07, 2013 5:28 pm
DuThaal Craftworld wrote:Seeing as the only current divide we have on the Secret Police bill is how hard it will be to erase it’s mention from history, I’m just gonna go ahead and submit the first draft for what is basically a more detailed 2nd Amendment.Statement The right of the people to possess, use and carry firearms shall not be infringed by any state, federal or other governmental authority. And while the right of the people to bear low-power explosives/artillery may be infringed, it shall not be prohibited in most circumstances*. Also not infringed is the right of the people to affix these weapons upon any frame that they wish, so long as they have the consent of the object’s owner.
Definitions; Defines firearms as any weapon with a projectile diameter of less than six point three five (6.35) centimeters, a projectile length of less than ten point one six (10.16) centimeters and utilizes a short combustion cycle to propel said projectile out of the weapon and towards a target. These may take the form of pistols, rifles, shotguns and large ‘sniper’ rifles. If the ammunition carries an explosive, poisonous or otherwise exotic payload the ammunition is to be governed by a seperate piece of legislation.
Defines low-power explosives as any explosive material with an explosive force of less than ten kilograms (22 pounds) when shaped into a regular cube measuring 1cm3 before detonation. Upon and after detonation it may not leave behind any harmful chemical, biological or radiological residue/effects upon the environment.
Defines artillery, for the purpose of this bill, to be any weapon with a projectile diameter above 6.35 centimeters.
Defines the circumstances under which a member of the populace’s right to bear low power exposives and artillery as legal charges. Unless otherwise stated, instant confiscation, a ban from owning such weapons again and selling the confiscated materials back onto the free market is the penalty. The legal charges applicable are as such; conspiracy to commit murder (with the weapon(s)), manslaughter (four month suspension, official training upon proper use), murder (with the weapon(s)), armed robbery (with the weapon(s)), rape (wherein the weapon(s) were used to coerce the raped party) or property destruction (with the weapon(s)).
Furthermore it shall take no less than a vote of 75% confidence at the minimum in order to repeal this bill.
Anything I screwed up monumentally with? Should there be tighter regulations on fully automatic weaponry (which, according to this draft, are governed the same as semi-auto weapons), anything anyone within this party would like to add/take away? Loop holes?

by Hathradic States » Tue May 07, 2013 5:42 pm

by Irredento » Tue May 07, 2013 6:03 pm
Hathradic States wrote:My fellow Imperials, I am here to announce that we have entered into an official alliance with the Classical Monarchist Party, which we have called the Stalhelm Alliance. They are welcome in our thread, and us in theirs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement