Advertisement

by Unicario » Mon May 06, 2013 1:28 pm

by Hathradic States » Mon May 06, 2013 1:29 pm
Unicario wrote:I propose we consider forming a Coalition of the Willing with the CMP, USLP and ourselves.

by Irredento » Mon May 06, 2013 1:30 pm
Unicario wrote:I propose we consider forming a Coalition of the Willing with the CMP, USLP and ourselves.

by Unicario » Mon May 06, 2013 1:30 pm
Irredento wrote:Unicario wrote:I propose we consider forming a Coalition of the Willing with the CMP, USLP and ourselves.
I wouldn't be willing to bring my party into any formal coalition containing the USLP even though I'm willing to have us work together to defeat this bill.
We have nothing in common otherwise and so I see no reason to form a coalition.

by Irredento » Mon May 06, 2013 1:32 pm
Unicario wrote:Irredento wrote:I wouldn't be willing to bring my party into any formal coalition containing the USLP even though I'm willing to have us work together to defeat this bill.
We have nothing in common otherwise and so I see no reason to form a coalition.
We don't need to agree on issues, we need to form a coalition against the rest of the Senate to stop them from destroying us.

by Hathradic States » Mon May 06, 2013 1:34 pm
Irredento wrote:Unicario wrote:
We don't need to agree on issues, we need to form a coalition against the rest of the Senate to stop them from destroying us.
What purpose would such a coalition serve? We're already going to oppose this bill together without a coalition anyway.
Also, my party would outright mutiny against me if I even suggest working with communists.

by Zweite Alaje » Mon May 06, 2013 1:34 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:Edit: Asshole
Costa Algeria is now on the NIFP shitlist.
I'm despising the PC more and more, im glad I didn't join them.

by Unicario » Mon May 06, 2013 1:34 pm

by Yankee Empire » Mon May 06, 2013 1:36 pm
Irredento wrote:I'm just posting here to let you know that the Monarchists will fight in the streets alongside you if the government attempts to take our weapons away.
But then, you knew that already, mein guten kameraden.

by Irredento » Mon May 06, 2013 1:36 pm
Hathradic States wrote:Irredento wrote:What purpose would such a coalition serve? We're already going to oppose this bill together without a coalition anyway.
Also, my party would outright mutiny against me if I even suggest working with communists.
Paramilitary alliance would be a better term for our relationship to the USLP.

by Hathradic States » Mon May 06, 2013 1:37 pm
Irredento wrote:Hathradic States wrote:Paramilitary alliance would be a better term for our relationship to the USLP.
The CMP's paramilitary is already pretty much allied with the NIFP but I'm not convinced that they wouldn't start firing on the communists given half the chance.
While we are together in our opposition to this liberal attempt to ban guns and paramilitaries, the communists are still our enemies.
Hell, the Elite Guard of our paramilitary carry photos of Tsar Nicholas II on all of their marches. Can you imagine them marching with the USLP?


by Zweite Alaje » Mon May 06, 2013 1:38 pm
Irredento wrote:Unicario wrote:
We don't need to agree on issues, we need to form a coalition against the rest of the Senate to stop them from destroying us.
What purpose would such a coalition serve? We're already going to oppose this bill together without a coalition anyway.
Also, my party would outright mutiny against me if I even suggest working with communists.

by Yankee Empire » Mon May 06, 2013 1:40 pm
Unicario wrote:Give me a break. the CMP and NIFP are the only conservative parties in the Senate. It's obvious that the PC are just centrist liberals.

by Othelos » Mon May 06, 2013 1:40 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:Edit: Asshole
Costa Algeria is now on the NIFP shitlist.
I'm despising the PC more and more, im glad I didn't join them.
The Progs are a disgrace to the right, they should stop lying to themselves and admit they're liberals putting up a very shitty front as "conservatives".

by Yankee Empire » Mon May 06, 2013 1:42 pm
Othelos wrote:Zweite Alaje wrote:The Progs are a disgrace to the right, they should stop lying to themselves and admit they're liberals putting up a very shitty front as "conservatives".
"Progressive" Conservatives.
And calm down, the PC represents liberals, conservatives, and centrists socially because we don't really have many official positions on social things.
There haven't been that many economic bills, so people haven't really seen our "right" side.

by Irredento » Mon May 06, 2013 1:47 pm
Zweite Alaje wrote:Irredento wrote:What purpose would such a coalition serve? We're already going to oppose this bill together without a coalition anyway.
Also, my party would outright mutiny against me if I even suggest working with communists.
The USLP is more like is than the liberals, they have discipline and a martial nature like us. If you ask me, a NIFP-CMP-USLP alliance would be the greatest force against the carebears we can get.

by Unicario » Mon May 06, 2013 1:47 pm

by Othelos » Mon May 06, 2013 1:47 pm
Yankee Empire wrote:Othelos wrote:"Progressive" Conservatives.
And calm down, the PC represents liberals, conservatives, and centrists socially because we don't really have many official positions on social things.
There haven't been that many economic bills, so people haven't really seen our "right" side.
Yeah like we said the only think Conservative about the party is some weired rightist laisseiz faire economics and there's already about three other parties that cater to that now.
There's very little that justifies the title "conservative".

by Unicario » Mon May 06, 2013 1:48 pm

by Pragia » Mon May 06, 2013 1:49 pm
Othelos wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:
Yeah like we said the only think Conservative about the party is some weired rightist laisseiz faire economics and there's already about three other parties that cater to that now.
There's very little that justifies the title "conservative".
The title, instead of describing us as conservative, describes us as progressive conservatives. So basically, we're "modern" conservatives that see that some things should change. So we probably seem liberal to the regular conservative (ex. a Republican), but not really, especially economically.
And we don't favor laissez faire economics.

by Yankee Empire » Mon May 06, 2013 1:50 pm
Othelos wrote:Yankee Empire wrote:
Yeah like we said the only think Conservative about the party is some weired rightist laisseiz faire economics and there's already about three other parties that cater to that now.
There's very little that justifies the title "conservative".
The title, instead of describing us as conservative, describes us as progressive conservatives. So basically, we're "modern" conservatives that see that some things should change. So we probably seem liberal to the regular conservative (ex. a Republican), but not really, especially economically.
And we don't favor laissez faire economics.

by Hathradic States » Mon May 06, 2013 1:51 pm
Unicario wrote:Comrade Hath, it is not advisable to continue to state that there will be violent revolution if they defy our will. They have a point in saying that threatening to use our paramilitaries doesn't help our case.

by Zweite Alaje » Mon May 06, 2013 1:52 pm

by Yankee Empire » Mon May 06, 2013 1:54 pm

by Hathradic States » Mon May 06, 2013 1:55 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement