Classical Monarchist Party Headquarters [NSG Senate]

[Strykla]

Will the Monarchist help us in the event we are called on disarm the reds?

I see no reason why not; if we are called upon by the government, then we are legally bound to serve. I should hope it does not come to killing, however.

[Transoxthraxia]

Will the Monarchist help us in the event we are called on disarm the reds?

The reds are arming? Somehow I feel like this will end in civil war.

[Hathradic States]

Will the Monarchist help us in the event we are called on disarm the reds?

The reds are arming? Somehow I feel like this will end in civil war.

They've been armed.

[Transoxthraxia]

The reds are arming? Somehow I feel like this will end in civil war.

They've been armed.

And should be disarmed, shortly, I'd hope.

A small part of me wants this to dissolve into a civil war, in all honesty.

[Harbertia]

The reds are arming? Somehow I feel like this will end in civil war.

They've been armed.

I assume this means the Internal Security Act did not pass?

[Greater Pokarnia]

They've been armed.

I assume this means the Internal Security Act did not pass?

It hasn't come to a vote yet. It only recently got added to queue.

[Harbertia]

Thanks for the information.
---

So I was doing some research into Libya. It has been out of the news so long and I now see a ray of hope. Currenlty the National Assembly of Libya is made up of independent parties however those parties with great power of liberal in nature. I did however find out that the Crown Price has remained ever loyal to his people and that the revolution was influenced by the prosperous stability of the Libyan Monarchy. A constitutional state that aided the allies in World War Two and had friendly relations with the US and UK. However this land soon came to the personal greed of urban elits which lead to the military uprising of Gaddaffi. During the revolution the people used the tri-colors of the monarchy and sang the national anthem of the kingdom. I feel the people if ever asked to may elect to have the Monarch restored.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as-Senussi

So, my fellow members of the Classical Monarchist, do you as I see hope for the Monarch's return, and if so do you think as I that Muhammad El Senussi will be a great king?

[Wolfmanne]

Thanks for the information.
---

So I was doing some research into Libya. It has been out of the news so long and I now see a ray of hope. Currenlty the National Assembly of Libya is made up of independent parties however those parties with great power of liberal in nature. I did however find out that the Crown Price has remained ever loyal to his people and that the revolution was influenced by the prosperous stability of the Libyan Monarchy. A constitutional state that aided the allies in World War Two and had friendly relations with the US and UK. However this land soon came to the personal greed of urban elits which lead to the military uprising of Gaddaffi. During the revolution the people used the tri-colors of the monarchy and sang the national anthem of the kingdom. I feel the people if ever asked to may elect to have the Monarch restored.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as-Senussi

So, my fellow members of the Classical Monarchist, do you as I see hope for the Monarch's return, and if so do you think as I that Muhammad El Senussi will be a great king?

Not a CMP member and I know I voted Republican in the NS Senate, but I support the return of the Libyan monarchy as the rightful rulers of Libya.

[Harbertia]

Thanks for the information.
---

So I was doing some research into Libya. It has been out of the news so long and I now see a ray of hope. Currenlty the National Assembly of Libya is made up of independent parties however those parties with great power of liberal in nature. I did however find out that the Crown Price has remained ever loyal to his people and that the revolution was influenced by the prosperous stability of the Libyan Monarchy. A constitutional state that aided the allies in World War Two and had friendly relations with the US and UK. However this land soon came to the personal greed of urban elits which lead to the military uprising of Gaddaffi. During the revolution the people used the tri-colors of the monarchy and sang the national anthem of the kingdom. I feel the people if ever asked to may elect to have the Monarch restored.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_as-Senussi

So, my fellow members of the Classical Monarchist, do you as I see hope for the Monarch's return, and if so do you think as I that Muhammad El Senussi will be a great king?

Not a CMP member and I know I voted Republican in the NS Senate, but I support the return of the Libyan monarchy as the rightful rulers of Libya.

Glade to hear it, it gladins me to see such open individuals are present here.

[Othelos]

What do you guys think of this bill?

Child Labor Restriction Act

Drafted by: Othelos (PC) and Lanos (PC)

Co-sponsors: Britcan (TR)

Noting the danger of children working in jobs best left for adults,

Realizing that without educational attainment, a person is likely to be stuck in poverty for the duration of his or her life,

Understanding that restricting the ability for children to be employed and requiring school attendance will improve society in the long run,

Hereby adopts this act as a measure to improve society and the lives of the citizens of Aurentia.

Section A: Age Restrictions

1. No person under the age of 14 may be employed in a job, with the exception of acting, modeling, or musical activities, with parental consent. These jobs may not take place during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of ages 14 through 17 are permitted to obtain jobs in the aforementioned positions, and any other job, unless restricted by the employer. However, they are not permitted to obtain jobs that are dangerous. This excludes persons of 16 and 17 years of age, who may be employed in a position in dangerous jobs with explicit parental consent.

4. Persons of ages over 17 are permitted to be employed in any job desired, unless restricted by the employer.

Section B: Education

1. All persons under the age of 16 are required to attend school, and may not be employed in jobs that require working during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of age 16 or 17 may drop out of school and be employed full time, with parental consent. This excludes persons 18 years old or older, who may drop out of school and be employed full time without parental consent.

Section C: Rights of Employed Minors

1. Employed minors shall receive the same workplace rights and privileges as their adult co-workers, unless said privileges are already kept from them under the law.

Section D: Definitions

1. Dangerous jobs are defined as jobs that have a distinct possibility of severely harming the worker physically, causing death, or causing undue stress because of tasks the job requires.

2. Acting is defined as the art or occupation of performing in plays, movies, internet productions, television productions, or future mediums of entertainment. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

3. Modeling is defined as the work of a fashion model. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

4. Musical activities are defined as activities that showcase the musical talent of an individual or group.

5. A minor is defined as a person below the age of 18.

[Harbertia]

What do you guys think of this bill?

Child Labor Restriction Act

Drafted by: Othelos (PC) and Lanos (PC)

Co-sponsors: Britcan (TR)

Noting the danger of children working in jobs best left for adults,

Realizing that without educational attainment, a person is likely to be stuck in poverty for the duration of his or her life,

Understanding that restricting the ability for children to be employed and requiring school attendance will improve society in the long run,

Hereby adopts this act as a measure to improve society and the lives of the citizens of Aurentia.

Section A: Age Restrictions

1. No person under the age of 14 may be employed in a job, with the exception of acting, modeling, or musical activities, with parental consent. These jobs may not take place during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of ages 14 through 17 are permitted to obtain jobs in the aforementioned positions, and any other job, unless restricted by the employer. However, they are not permitted to obtain jobs that are dangerous. This excludes persons of 16 and 17 years of age, who may be employed in a position in dangerous jobs with explicit parental consent.

4. Persons of ages over 17 are permitted to be employed in any job desired, unless restricted by the employer.

Section B: Education

1. All persons under the age of 16 are required to attend school, and may not be employed in jobs that require working during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of age 16 or 17 may drop out of school and be employed full time, with parental consent. This excludes persons 18 years old or older, who may drop out of school and be employed full time without parental consent.

Section C: Rights of Employed Minors

1. Employed minors shall receive the same workplace rights and privileges as their adult co-workers, unless said privileges are already kept from them under the law.

Section D: Definitions

1. Dangerous jobs are defined as jobs that have a distinct possibility of severely harming the worker physically, causing death, or causing undue stress because of tasks the job requires.

2. Acting is defined as the art or occupation of performing in plays, movies, internet productions, television productions, or future mediums of entertainment. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

3. Modeling is defined as the work of a fashion model. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

4. Musical activities are defined as activities that showcase the musical talent of an individual or group.

5. A minor is defined as a person below the age of 18.

This sounds great, I think I will share it with the Red-Greens. Wait, you already have XD

[Valentir]

What do you guys think of this bill?

Child Labor Restriction Act

Drafted by: Othelos (PC) and Lanos (PC)

Co-sponsors: Britcan (TR)

Noting the danger of children working in jobs best left for adults,

Realizing that without educational attainment, a person is likely to be stuck in poverty for the duration of his or her life,

Understanding that restricting the ability for children to be employed and requiring school attendance will improve society in the long run,

Hereby adopts this act as a measure to improve society and the lives of the citizens of Aurentia.

Section A: Age Restrictions

1. No person under the age of 14 may be employed in a job, with the exception of acting, modeling, or musical activities, with parental consent. These jobs may not take place during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of ages 14 through 17 are permitted to obtain jobs in the aforementioned positions, and any other job, unless restricted by the employer. However, they are not permitted to obtain jobs that are dangerous. This excludes persons of 16 and 17 years of age, who may be employed in a position in dangerous jobs with explicit parental consent.

4. Persons of ages over 17 are permitted to be employed in any job desired, unless restricted by the employer.

Section B: Education

1. All persons under the age of 16 are required to attend school, and may not be employed in jobs that require working during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of age 16 or 17 may drop out of school and be employed full time, with parental consent. This excludes persons 18 years old or older, who may drop out of school and be employed full time without parental consent.

Section C: Rights of Employed Minors

1. Employed minors shall receive the same workplace rights and privileges as their adult co-workers, unless said privileges are already kept from them under the law.

Section D: Definitions

1. Dangerous jobs are defined as jobs that have a distinct possibility of severely harming the worker physically, causing death, or causing undue stress because of tasks the job requires.

2. Acting is defined as the art or occupation of performing in plays, movies, internet productions, television productions, or future mediums of entertainment. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

3. Modeling is defined as the work of a fashion model. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

4. Musical activities are defined as activities that showcase the musical talent of an individual or group.

5. A minor is defined as a person below the age of 18.

I would support this.

[Greater Pokarnia]

Hello everyone! Regnum and I are taking a survey to get accurate information as to the Political Compass of each party in the NSG Senate. If you'd like to help, please take the time to add your Political Compass scores to this survey.

[Divitaen]

What do you guys think of this bill?

Child Labor Restriction Act

Drafted by: Othelos (PC) and Lanos (PC)

Co-sponsors: Britcan (TR)

Noting the danger of children working in jobs best left for adults,

Realizing that without educational attainment, a person is likely to be stuck in poverty for the duration of his or her life,

Understanding that restricting the ability for children to be employed and requiring school attendance will improve society in the long run,

Hereby adopts this act as a measure to improve society and the lives of the citizens of Aurentia.

Section A: Age Restrictions

1. No person under the age of 14 may be employed in a job, with the exception of acting, modeling, or musical activities, with parental consent. These jobs may not take place during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of ages 14 through 17 are permitted to obtain jobs in the aforementioned positions, and any other job, unless restricted by the employer. However, they are not permitted to obtain jobs that are dangerous. This excludes persons of 16 and 17 years of age, who may be employed in a position in dangerous jobs with explicit parental consent.

4. Persons of ages over 17 are permitted to be employed in any job desired, unless restricted by the employer.

Section B: Education

1. All persons under the age of 16 are required to attend school, and may not be employed in jobs that require working during school hours on school days.

2. Persons of age 16 or 17 may drop out of school and be employed full time, with parental consent. This excludes persons 18 years old or older, who may drop out of school and be employed full time without parental consent.

Section C: Rights of Employed Minors

1. Employed minors shall receive the same workplace rights and privileges as their adult co-workers, unless said privileges are already kept from them under the law.

Section D: Definitions

1. Dangerous jobs are defined as jobs that have a distinct possibility of severely harming the worker physically, causing death, or causing undue stress because of tasks the job requires.

2. Acting is defined as the art or occupation of performing in plays, movies, internet productions, television productions, or future mediums of entertainment. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

3. Modeling is defined as the work of a fashion model. Persons under the age of 18 may not be employed in a position that requires nudity or sexual activity.

4. Musical activities are defined as activities that showcase the musical talent of an individual or group.

5. A minor is defined as a person below the age of 18.

I would support this.

I know we are not an economic libertarian party, but I will be personally voting against this, mostly because I think it's unfair to restrict families with consenting children attempting to bridge an income-consumption gap during a recession, and the grey line drawn between "musical" work and "dangerous" work is dangerous. I can imagine large companies suddenly adding "musical" elements to their child labour jobs just to confuse government regulators, and regulators will sieve through these grey areas based on corporate conflict of interest and internal ties with government. Furthermore, the principle line between the two is equally vague. If the argument is that children are incapable of giving consent to jobs, then allowing them to participate as actors or musicians pretty much contradicts this same argument.

But that's just my personal stance.

[Hathradic States]

Thoughts, my allies?

[Reikskirche]

How does one join this party?

[Transoxthraxia]

Thoughts, my allies?

I like.

[Strykla]

How does one join this party?

Ask and you shall receive.

[Reikskirche]

Oh, in that case.

Hello friends, I'm Reikskirche, and I would like to join your social club.

[Harbertia]

Oh, in that case.

Hello friends, I'm Reikskirche, and I would like to join your social club.

Welcome to the party!

[The Realm of God]

I would support this.

I know we are not an economic libertarian party, but I will be personally voting against this, mostly because I think it's unfair to restrict families with consenting children attempting to bridge an income-consumption gap during a recession, and the grey line drawn between "musical" work and "dangerous" work is dangerous. I can imagine large companies suddenly adding "musical" elements to their child labour jobs just to confuse government regulators, and regulators will sieve through these grey areas based on corporate conflict of interest and internal ties with government. Furthermore, the principle line between the two is equally vague. If the argument is that children are incapable of giving consent to jobs, then allowing them to participate as actors or musicians pretty much contradicts this same argument.

But that's just my personal stance.

I actually agree with this, what makes music special? What sets it apart from other labour?

[Othelos]

I know we are not an economic libertarian party, but I will be personally voting against this, mostly because I think it's unfair to restrict families with consenting children attempting to bridge an income-consumption gap during a recession, and the grey line drawn between "musical" work and "dangerous" work is dangerous. I can imagine large companies suddenly adding "musical" elements to their child labour jobs just to confuse government regulators, and regulators will sieve through these grey areas based on corporate conflict of interest and internal ties with government. Furthermore, the principle line between the two is equally vague. If the argument is that children are incapable of giving consent to jobs, then allowing them to participate as actors or musicians pretty much contradicts this same argument.

But that's just my personal stance.

I actually agree with this, what makes music special? What sets it apart from other labour?

I can always take it out. It was just a suggestion by someone.

[The Realm of God]

I actually agree with this, what makes music special? What sets it apart from other labour?

I can always take it out. It was just a suggestion by someone.

It's ok if its a voluntary club, but playing professional music isn't much different from any other paying job.

[Truziodis]

Does our nation have a constitution yet?

[Truziodis]

I would support this.

I know we are not an economic libertarian party, but I will be personally voting against this, mostly because I think it's unfair to restrict families with consenting children attempting to bridge an income-consumption gap during a recession, and the grey line drawn between "musical" work and "dangerous" work is dangerous. I can imagine large companies suddenly adding "musical" elements to their child labour jobs just to confuse government regulators, and regulators will sieve through these grey areas based on corporate conflict of interest and internal ties with government. Furthermore, the principle line between the two is equally vague. If the argument is that children are incapable of giving consent to jobs, then allowing them to participate as actors or musicians pretty much contradicts this same argument.

But that's just my personal stance.

Agreed. I'm opposed to the act.