Distruzio wrote:Rumostan wrote:So, am I an acceptable candidate?
As far as I am concerned you are. You espouse a conservative syncrenism that is quite refreshing. Too many of our conservative cousins abroad use their perspectives to justify reactionary policies and positions that mirror their progressivist counterparts. You suggest positions that hint at conservatism being a garment that protects rather than a glue that binds. That's rather pleasant.
Your willingness to admit concessions on certain contentious issues while insisting on a rigid stance on others, however, is a bit contradictory. For instance, possessing a willingness to consider policy recommendations from contrarian parties altogether dismissive of conservatism for the good of Aurentinia is admirable, I admit. But why does this inclination to hold the good of the nation preeminent only include issues you do not "think are wrong?" This will be the thread that your opponents in the election would be wise to tug at. A candidate without a cohesive and inclusionary position can be exploited and defeated.
I do enjoy this conversation, I hope you realize. I like to get to know party members better.
Oh I did realise, don't worry. I also like to get to know the party members better but I normally observe for quite a while instead of asking questions, I should probably do what you do in the future.
If I do not become the host then I will still try to become our candidate and I will also think about what you have said.
Thanks, happy to be here.
