All that really needs to be said is "The lady", the rest is assumed.
Advertisement

by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:26 am

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:47 am
Grand Longueville wrote:Valentir wrote:Well I support the Constitutional Monarchy forms of the UK, the country I live in, but I support the Liberal Democrat Party. So it's just a Constitutional Monarchy with the Liberal Democrat Party in Parliament.
What is the mafia?
Just a bunch of hooligans that are killing senators willy nilly. Unfortunately, I think some NIFP-ers are pezzonovante, so to speak.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:48 am

by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 10:52 am
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Grand Longueville wrote:
Just a bunch of hooligans that are killing senators willy nilly. Unfortunately, I think some NIFP-ers are pezzonovante, so to speak.
Are you trying to piss me off?!
1. I could list several CMP members, right now, that are Mafiosi. Don't be so self righteous. Your party is no better or less infiltrated than any other. In fact, it is the second-most-mob-occupied party in the senate.
2. Once again: WE ARE NOT KILLING PEOPLE WILLY-NILLY. THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED JOINED THE MOB AND BEGAN INFORMING ON US.
God damn people, get a fucking clue. You think because we don't advertise our membership that the only people in there must be the open one (an NIFP member). You think because you don't know what the fuck is going in that what must be happening is what your mediocre reasoning deduces ("duhhhh dat sentor dedd 2 dam mob hooligans").
Try actually thinking for a change, people, and maybe you wouldn't seem so idiotic to the rest of us.

by Maryginia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:01 am
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Grand Longueville wrote:
Just a bunch of hooligans that are killing senators willy nilly. Unfortunately, I think some NIFP-ers are pezzonovante, so to speak.
Are you trying to piss me off?!
1. I could list several CMP members, right now, that are Mafiosi. Don't be so self righteous. Your party is no better or less infiltrated than any other. In fact, it is the second-most-mob-occupied party in the senate.
2. Once again: WE ARE NOT KILLING PEOPLE WILLY-NILLY. THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED JOINED THE MOB AND BEGAN INFORMING ON US.
God damn people, get a fucking clue. You think because we don't advertise our membership that the only people in there must be the open one (an NIFP member). You think because you don't know what the fuck is going in that what must be happening is what your mediocre reasoning deduces ("duhhhh dat sentor dedd 2 dam mob hooligans").
Try actually thinking for a change, people, and maybe you wouldn't seem so idiotic to the rest of us.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:03 am
Maryginia wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Are you trying to piss me off?!
1. I could list several CMP members, right now, that are Mafiosi. Don't be so self righteous. Your party is no better or less infiltrated than any other. In fact, it is the second-most-mob-occupied party in the senate.
2. Once again: WE ARE NOT KILLING PEOPLE WILLY-NILLY. THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED JOINED THE MOB AND BEGAN INFORMING ON US.
God damn people, get a fucking clue. You think because we don't advertise our membership that the only people in there must be the open one (an NIFP member). You think because you don't know what the fuck is going in that what must be happening is what your mediocre reasoning deduces ("duhhhh dat sentor dedd 2 dam mob hooligans").
Try actually thinking for a change, people, and maybe you wouldn't seem so idiotic to the rest of us.
Good to know, With this knowledge I'd Like to propose an inquiry into all members of the party, and purge those who are found to be in the Mafia.

by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:04 am
Maryginia wrote:Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Are you trying to piss me off?!
1. I could list several CMP members, right now, that are Mafiosi. Don't be so self righteous. Your party is no better or less infiltrated than any other. In fact, it is the second-most-mob-occupied party in the senate.
2. Once again: WE ARE NOT KILLING PEOPLE WILLY-NILLY. THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN KILLED JOINED THE MOB AND BEGAN INFORMING ON US.
God damn people, get a fucking clue. You think because we don't advertise our membership that the only people in there must be the open one (an NIFP member). You think because you don't know what the fuck is going in that what must be happening is what your mediocre reasoning deduces ("duhhhh dat sentor dedd 2 dam mob hooligans").
Try actually thinking for a change, people, and maybe you wouldn't seem so idiotic to the rest of us.
Good to know, With this knowledge I'd Like to propose an inquiry into all members of the party, and purge those who are found to be in the Mafia.

by Maryginia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:05 am

by Maryginia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:07 am
Grand Longueville wrote:Maryginia wrote:Good to know, With this knowledge I'd Like to propose an inquiry into all members of the party, and purge those who are found to be in the Mafia.
I reject this proposal. I feel this to be infringing on the individual liberties of Party members without just reason.

by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:10 am
Maryginia wrote:Grand Longueville wrote:
I reject this proposal. I feel this to be infringing on the individual liberties of Party members without just reason.
Pruss just said we are the second most infiltrated party in the senate, unless your a member what do you have to fear, seriously its a few personal questions or the like and be on your way, what's the harm in it, I fail to see how opening an inquiry on someone violates their liberties, I'm willing to go through it myself.

by Maryginia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:19 am
Grand Longueville wrote:Maryginia wrote:Pruss just said we are the second most infiltrated party in the senate, unless your a member what do you have to fear, seriously its a few personal questions or the like and be on your way, what's the harm in it, I fail to see how opening an inquiry on someone violates their liberties, I'm willing to go through it myself.
I refuse to cooperate. This gestapo movement is one that turns brother against brother, till neither exists any more. No, my good man, I refuse. What fool proof question could you ask, any way?

by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:23 am
Maryginia wrote:Grand Longueville wrote:
I refuse to cooperate. This gestapo movement is one that turns brother against brother, till neither exists any more. No, my good man, I refuse. What fool proof question could you ask, any way?
How does it turn Brother against brother it merely has an iqiury upon each senator, and I am willing to underfgo it, why shouldn't you?

by Mediciano » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:25 am
Grand Longueville wrote:Maryginia wrote:Pruss just said we are the second most infiltrated party in the senate, unless your a member what do you have to fear, seriously its a few personal questions or the like and be on your way, what's the harm in it, I fail to see how opening an inquiry on someone violates their liberties, I'm willing to go through it myself.
I refuse to cooperate. This gestapo movement is one that turns brother against brother, till neither exists any more. No, my good man, I refuse. What fool proof question could you ask, any way?

by Maryginia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:28 am
Grand Longueville wrote:Maryginia wrote:How does it turn Brother against brother it merely has an iqiury upon each senator, and I am willing to underfgo it, why shouldn't you?
It turns brother monarchists into suspects. I am not willing to cooperate with this inquiry because the inquiry in question is superfluous and unreasonable.

by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:32 am
Maryginia wrote:Grand Longueville wrote:
It turns brother monarchists into suspects. I am not willing to cooperate with this inquiry because the inquiry in question is superfluous and unreasonable.
And yet some of our Brother Monarchists are suspects, Prussia has said we have some in our party who are mafiosi, we need them out.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:41 am

by Maryginia » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:48 am

by The Holy NeoSpanish Empire » Sat Jun 29, 2013 11:51 am


by Grand Longueville » Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:10 pm
Maryginia wrote:The conflicting statements are all the more reason for an inquiry. m It'll find let us find out who's lying.

by Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:23 pm

by Rumostan » Sat Jun 29, 2013 12:47 pm

by Aurentine Constabularies » Sat Jun 29, 2013 5:31 pm

The Evidence Against Senator Rothschild:
- EWT which states the 'expensive' wine is rarely ordered, and has only been ordered by Senator Rothschild thusfar.
Aurentine Constabularies wrote:The sirens were building as the Barkeep had diligently phoned the police, and it was maybe a minute or two before a Land Rover Defender in the Constabulary livery skidded to a halt outside the pub. The two men piled out, both wearing suits and quickly drawing compact pistols as they ran toward the Arms. The first man in was a tad over weight, and balding slightly, but that didn't stop him from moving fast and calling out to the bartender - or whoever it was - that he saw crouched over the body on the floor. "Oi, get back!" The Detective Inspector moved fast, pulling the confused waiter away from the body and moving in to check for a pulse. As he stood, he spotted Minister Alegria in a booth. "Sir, apologies about the interruption to your evening..." He said, a slight tone of amusement in his words.
He didn't even have to get onto his knees and lean in before he spotted the fact that the man was dead. "Everyone stand back." The Detective sighed, gesturing to his partner. "Detective Constable Chambers will interview you while I search the crime scene."
(OOC: I am aware this is horrifically unrealistic, but we can't have the whole 'everything' that comes with the Police IRL. It would drag things out for too long, and render the whole idea of the police untenable. So, I'll take this format when investigating crimes: one will take interviews, one will search the crime scene. I'll use d20 to decide how much evidence I find, and take into account the Perpetrators'/witnesses' posts to ensure I do not god-mod.)
Interview QuestionsFor a Witness:
1) What happened? (assumed answer is along the lines of 'someone got shot')
2) Can you explain in more detail? What were you doing when you heard the shot?
3) Mm-hmm, and did you see the perpetrator, any details you noticed about them?
4) What about the victim, did you notice anything about him when he was in the pub?
5) Thank you, sir, you've been a help to the police. And, what is your name?/Well, if you remember anything more then you can contact me here. What is your name, sir? (depends on how helpful your character was)For Waiter:
1) What happened? (assumed answer is along the lines of 'someone got shot')
2) Can you explain in more detail? What were you doing when you heard the shot? (assumed answer is 'I was serving the shooter')
3) I see, you saw him up close? Did you recognise the man, did he have any recognising features? (assumed answer is along the lines of 'physical description' and 'he ordered the most expensive wine in the house - by saying 'I'll have the most expensive wine' and all')
4) Does anyone normally act similarly? It's possible that the assassin let a personality quirk show through their nerves when performing the assassination.
5) Hmm, how much is this wine, and how many people order it, would you say, in a week?
6) Could you get me a list of everyone who's ordered it? (assumed that as Senator Rothschild 'always' felt better after pulling the stunt his name will occur repeatedly)
7) Thank you, was there anything else you noticed?Thank you, sir, you've been a help to the police. And, what is your name?/Well, if you remember anything more then you can contact me here. What is your name, sir? (depends on how helpful your character was)
Beta Test wrote:The Waiter
1) This guy shot someone
2) I was waiting to the guy when he shot the victim threw his newspaper
3)Sorry, no
4)Ah, heck no. There have been no killings in this pub before
5)$80.00 a bottle and that was the first order this week
6)Senator Rothschild is the only person I can recall who bought it
7)The victim was wearing a scarf over his face and was acting strange himself
My name is George Stevens
- The Perpetrator also ordered the item in the signature 'Senator Rothschild Manner'
Mediciano wrote:"I'd like a bottle of the most expensive drink you have." It was classless and juvenile, but Rothschild always felt better after asking for it
- The Data on the USLP's Party Servers from Senator Orson (believed to be a Member of the Mafia, currently on the run for murder) includes diary entries for meetings between the two in the future. Why would a Stalinist/extreme Left-wing senator be meeting with almost utterly his ideological opposite unless there was another connection? Even if this is discounted as 'God-modding', the other evidence should be sufficient.
Aurentine Constabularies wrote:two pieces of evidence stood out. There were three meetings in his organiser with a man in 'Corleone Penthouse', including one scheduled for a few days time, and the others further in the future.
(I'm aware that I was 'choosing evidence to find', but the NSG Senate Admins okayed finding a 'weak connection' between Senator Orson and a mafia member. This is because of the blatant insanity of everything in his house and his office being removed to avoid there being any evidence at all of any kind (i.e. there was no furnishings at all in either, except for a broken terminal in his Office) - especially as his office is in a very secure building where much of the furniture's removal would be theft.)The Evidence Located in the Bar:
- Physical Evidence at the Crime-Scene includes fingerprints which show Senator Rothsberg must have been the killer - he touched the wine-list the killer touched, and had not been in the pub otherwise that night. They match those on the Business Card which Inspector Doe handed to and then retrieved from Senator Rothsberg.
Mediciano wrote:Lifting up a wine menu, Rothschild surveyed its contents.Aurentine Constabularies wrote:
- Physical Evidence: Fingerprints on the wine list. Due to a lack of a national database they can only be compared with samples we take during the investigation.
.22 rounds, sub-sonic load. Due to a lack of anything to compare to, they can only be used to demonstrate that 'x' pistol was used if we can test using 'x' Pistol.
The Evidence on the Card:Aurentine Constabularies wrote:He held out a card with his number on it, and the Senator placed his hand on it to take it. "Here's my Card, sir..." Inspector Doe paused, a grin appearing on his face as he took the card back. "On second thoughts, sir, you're probably rich enough to have my bosses bosses boss on speed-dial..."Mediciano wrote:Rothschild watched the constables step away. 'Curious,' he thought, 'that last bit with the business card.' He was smiling bemusedly to himself about this strange action when, suddenly, it dawned on him. He turned towards the constables, a look of utter fury on his face just before the elevator doors shut tight.
'They have my fingerprints,' he thought...Aurentine Constabularies wrote:As the elevator sped on its way down the building, Inspector Doe tucked the card into the small evidence packet in his pocket, before tucking it in - evidence and the chain thereof must be obeyed.
- Finalment, Eye Witness Testimony puts Senator Rothschild as the Killer. To Avoid any form of participant effect on the testimony (i.e. a leading question) the Question used did not point to any of the pictures as a 'more likely candidate', and it did not even say that 'one of them deffo. was the killer'
Aurentine Constabularies wrote:"Sir, one final question. " He pulled out an iPad he'd taken from the crime lab, turning it to face the Waiter. Do you recognise the man you served on the night of the shooting in the following pictures? Oh, and this statement will be recorded."
The First picture - Senator Kourie. The Second - Muhammad Ali. The Third - Senator Erich Malgrave. The Fourth - Senator Rothschild. The Fifth - Senator Hans Freedom. The Sixth - Senator Harold Saxon. The Seventh - Commissioner Pratchett.Beta Test wrote:"Yes I do! The Fourth one!"In the Opinion of Superintendent Mikaelsen of the Aurentine Capital Constabulary, this is sufficient Evidence to request the following Warrants:
Arrest of Senator Rothsberg of the CMP for Murder
Search of the Corleone Casino - known to be his primary office.

by Diopolis » Sat Jun 29, 2013 7:44 pm
Maryginia wrote:The conflicting statements are all the more reason for an inquiry. m It'll find let us find out who's lying.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement