NATION

PASSWORD

Classical Monarchist Party Headquarters [NSG Senate]

A resting-place for threads that might have otherwise been lost.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Thu May 30, 2013 6:21 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Why not OD Green?


Or white, that's quite a very popular colour.

And surely you wolfmanne can't object to a redcoat!
Or, maybe Rifles Green? That's a very nice colour.

To avoid the Tyramny of the government: decreeing what colours private company workers can wear...

*tsk*
Kouralia:

User avatar
Wolfmanne
Senator
 
Posts: 4418
Founded: Mar 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne » Thu May 30, 2013 6:21 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Why not OD Green?


Or white, that's quite a very popular colour.

And surely you wolfmanne can't object to a redcoat!

Yes I can, because this is not Britain and I don't see why some cheap imitators should have the right to wear such a distinguished uniform.
Cicero thinks I'm Rome's Helen of Troy and Octavian thinks he'll get his money, the stupid fools.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Thu May 30, 2013 6:25 am

Wolfmanne wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Or white, that's quite a very popular colour.

And surely you wolfmanne can't object to a redcoat!

Yes I can, because this is not Britain and I don't see why some cheap imitators should have the right to wear such a distinguished uniform.


may i remind you Boris is related to king George II. That qualifies to put on the uniform I think!
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Thu May 30, 2013 6:26 am

Wolfmanne wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Or white, that's quite a very popular colour.

And surely you wolfmanne can't object to a redcoat!

Yes I can, because this is not Britain and I don't see why some cheap imitators should have the right to wear such a distinguished uniform.

So, does this mean Senator Kourie's personal guards can wear this then? :p
Image
Kouralia:

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Thu May 30, 2013 7:08 pm

Yay!!!! No firearms act, i can keep my explosives.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Thu May 30, 2013 7:10 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:Yay!!!! No firearms act, i can keep my explosives.

The ISA did pass. I believe you command one of the regiments of the royalist guard, so go to headquarters for instructions.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Thu May 30, 2013 7:13 pm

I hope our two parties stand united on the legality of seeking the death penalty in the case of extreme crimes.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Thu May 30, 2013 7:16 pm

The Zeonic States wrote:I hope our two parties stand united on the legality of seeking the death penalty in the case of extreme crimes.

That's the party line, but I will not enforce a whip on the death penalty.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
The Zeonic States
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12078
Founded: Jul 29, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Zeonic States » Thu May 30, 2013 7:18 pm

Diopolis wrote:
The Zeonic States wrote:I hope our two parties stand united on the legality of seeking the death penalty in the case of extreme crimes.

That's the party line, but I will not enforce a whip on the death penalty.


I understand.

But i am glad we can find some middle ground here.

:/

With the ISA passing i needed some good news.
National Imperialist-Freedom Party

Proud member of the stone wall alliance

Agent Maine: of NSG's Official Project Freelancer

[Fires of the Old Republic Role Play]http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=239203

User avatar
Yankee Empire
Senator
 
Posts: 4186
Founded: Aug 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankee Empire » Fri May 31, 2013 1:44 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:
Transoxthraxia wrote:I would actually be up for ignoring the act if passed, and see the reaction of the senate.

That would certainly be interesting. Or at least declaring that we refuse to disarm until the Communists and the USLP do so first. I suspect they'd then say the same thing of us, and we could keep it going indefinitely...

I like this plan.
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05


Pro: U.S.,Diplomatic Militarism, Imperialism, Patriotism/Civic Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, Stoicism, Authoritarianism, Classical Liberalism, Unionism, Centralization (usually), Federalism, Corporatism.
Anti:Tribalism, Seccessionism(usually),Decentralization,Pure Capitalism/State controlled economics, Misanthropy,Cruelty, Cowardice, Pacifism,Hedonism, Corporitocracy.
Vice-Chairman of the National-Imperialist-FreedomParty
"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."-Carl Schurz

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Fri May 31, 2013 1:46 am

Yankee Empire wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:That would certainly be interesting. Or at least declaring that we refuse to disarm until the Communists and the USLP do so first. I suspect they'd then say the same thing of us, and we could keep it going indefinitely...

I like this plan.

We already "disarmed"

That is to say our guns grew legs and run away.
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Greater Pokarnia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 693
Founded: Apr 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Pokarnia » Fri May 31, 2013 1:47 am

CTALNH wrote:
Yankee Empire wrote:I like this plan.

We already "disarmed"

That is to say our guns grew legs and run away.


Adding to this, the Communist Party has no plans of resisting the bill (even though many members disagree with it).
First Deputy Secretary of the Communist Party and Minister of Education of the NSG Senate, representing Constituency 316.




[Insert personal information]

User avatar
Yankee Empire
Senator
 
Posts: 4186
Founded: Aug 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yankee Empire » Fri May 31, 2013 1:51 am

Greater Pokarnia wrote:
CTALNH wrote:We already "disarmed"

That is to say our guns grew legs and run away.


Adding to this, the Communist Party has no plans of resisting the bill (even though many members disagree with it).


Those guys have no right to call themselves "Communists" their Social Democrats/Socialists with fetish for "distributing the means of production among the proletariat".
Economic Left/Right: -6.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.05


Pro: U.S.,Diplomatic Militarism, Imperialism, Patriotism/Civic Nationalism, Cosmopolitanism, Stoicism, Authoritarianism, Classical Liberalism, Unionism, Centralization (usually), Federalism, Corporatism.
Anti:Tribalism, Seccessionism(usually),Decentralization,Pure Capitalism/State controlled economics, Misanthropy,Cruelty, Cowardice, Pacifism,Hedonism, Corporitocracy.
Vice-Chairman of the National-Imperialist-FreedomParty
"My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."-Carl Schurz

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Fri May 31, 2013 1:52 am

Yankee Empire wrote:
Greater Pokarnia wrote:
Adding to this, the Communist Party has no plans of resisting the bill (even though many members disagree with it).


Those guys have no right to call themselves "Communists" their Social Democrats/Socialists with fetish for "distributing the means of production among the proletariat".

Are we communists?
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Greater Pokarnia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 693
Founded: Apr 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Pokarnia » Fri May 31, 2013 1:54 am

Yankee Empire wrote:
Greater Pokarnia wrote:
Adding to this, the Communist Party has no plans of resisting the bill (even though many members disagree with it).


Those guys have no right to call themselves "Communists" their Social Democrats/Socialists with fetish for "distributing the means of production among the proletariat".


I can't come up with a counterpoint to any evidence you provided to back up that statement.

Guess why.
First Deputy Secretary of the Communist Party and Minister of Education of the NSG Senate, representing Constituency 316.




[Insert personal information]

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 16673
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Fri May 31, 2013 1:58 am

Chaps, please take your argument elsewhere. This is the Classical Monarchist Party headquarters, not the NIFP-USLP-CP debate forum.
"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.
"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Fri May 31, 2013 4:28 am

Just here to drum up support for the Commonwealth Act, since being a oart of the Commonwealth requires Aurentina to accept Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as head of the organisation thus giving you an opening towards establishing a monarchy.

Adieu.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Irredento
Envoy
 
Posts: 313
Founded: Mar 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irredento » Fri May 31, 2013 10:30 am

It is probably for the best that I have stepped down as leader as the passing of the ISA might have caused me to drag the nation into a civil war.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri May 31, 2013 11:34 am

Irredento wrote:It is probably for the best that I have stepped down as leader as the passing of the ISA might have caused me to drag the nation into a civil war.


Don't worry, we still have the royalist guard. Its just a private security firm owned by us instead of being a paramilitary (Whoever wrote the ISA was an idiot since we effectively just have make it a private firm and change its name to "The royalist guard limited" 8) ). And since the firearms act did not pass we don't have to give up any of our armaments. :lol2:
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Fri May 31, 2013 11:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Wolfmanne
Senator
 
Posts: 4418
Founded: Mar 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne » Fri May 31, 2013 11:44 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Irredento wrote:It is probably for the best that I have stepped down as leader as the passing of the ISA might have caused me to drag the nation into a civil war.


Don't worry, we still have the royalist guard. Its just a private security firm owned by us instead of being a paramilitary (Whoever wrote the ISA was an idiot since we effectively just have make it a private firm and change its name to "The royalist guard limited" 8) ). And since the firearms act did not pass we don't have to give up any of our armaments. :lol2:

Are they Ofsecure qualified? Do their uniforms clearly make them look like security guards?
Cicero thinks I'm Rome's Helen of Troy and Octavian thinks he'll get his money, the stupid fools.

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 16673
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Fri May 31, 2013 11:46 am

Wolfmanne wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Don't worry, we still have the royalist guard. Its just a private security firm owned by us instead of being a paramilitary (Whoever wrote the ISA was an idiot since we effectively just have make it a private firm and change its name to "The royalist guard limited" 8) ). And since the firearms act did not pass we don't have to give up any of our armaments. :lol2:

Are they Ofsecure qualified? Do their uniforms clearly make them look like security guards?

Yes. At least, my personal guard (the Yeoman of the Guard) are.

They can still wear their fancy 19th century style dress uniforms in private, right?
"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.
"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri May 31, 2013 11:48 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:
Wolfmanne wrote:Are they Ofsecure qualified? Do their uniforms clearly make them look like security guards?

Yes. At least, my personal guard (the Yeoman of the Guard) are.

They can still wear their fancy 19th century style dress uniforms in private, right?


Actually i believe if the wear the right colour dress uniforms then they can wear them in public still. What colour are the dress uniforms?
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Wolfmanne
Senator
 
Posts: 4418
Founded: Mar 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne » Fri May 31, 2013 11:51 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:
Wolfmanne wrote:Are they Ofsecure qualified? Do their uniforms clearly make them look like security guards?

Yes. At least, my personal guard (the Yeoman of the Guard) are.

They can still wear their fancy 19th century style dress uniforms in private, right?

If they are not performing their duty as a security officer, then sure.

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Yes. At least, my personal guard (the Yeoman of the Guard) are.

They can still wear their fancy 19th century style dress uniforms in private, right?


Actually i believe if the wear the right colour dress uniforms then they can wear them in public still. What colour are the dress uniforms?

You tell me.
Last edited by Wolfmanne on Fri May 31, 2013 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cicero thinks I'm Rome's Helen of Troy and Octavian thinks he'll get his money, the stupid fools.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Fri May 31, 2013 11:54 am

Yeah i just checked, they wear a predominately blue uniformed coat with black hats and boots. They can wear their uniform with pride in public still.

There is a picture up in the Guard thread. viewtopic.php?p=14302784#p14302784
Last edited by The Nihilistic view on Fri May 31, 2013 11:58 am, edited 3 times in total.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Wolfmanne
Senator
 
Posts: 4418
Founded: Mar 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne » Fri May 31, 2013 11:58 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:Yeah i just checked, they wear a predominately blue uniform with black hats and boots. They can wear their uniform with pride in public still.

There is a picture up in the Guard thread. viewtopic.php?p=14302784#p14302784

That would be defined as a militaristic uniform, not a security officer one. The hat for one has to be either a beret or a regular officer's cap. This is what one a security officer should look like:

http://www.gsslimited.co.uk/wp-content/ ... -Guard.jpg
Cicero thinks I'm Rome's Helen of Troy and Octavian thinks he'll get his money, the stupid fools.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads