Advertisement

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:15 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:16 pm

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:18 pm

by The Nihilistic view » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:32 pm
Beta Test wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
This could be a good time to do a "the week with Rupert" I would be more than happy to oblige as one of the main protagonists.
I have someone who is going to appear but he's not online yet. However, you can appear as well. It can be a special on the unfolding government crisis in Aurentina.

by The Nihilistic view » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:33 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:I'm also in discussions with the Red-Greens. They don't actually know that the CMP and the NFIP have been kicked out.

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:46 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:08 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:We should hold another vote on a Prime Ministerial candidate.

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:11 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:13 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:14 pm
Maklohi Vai wrote:Well I would support you, but I think with the current situation you would not be elected to PM.

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 6:19 pm

by Chetssaland » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:11 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:12 pm

by Chetssaland » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:14 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:33 pm

by Slazliyka » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:35 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:39 pm
Slazliyka wrote:You have to hold the vote. The PM holds office with confidence of the senate.
Even if you don't hold the vote we can still motion for a vote of no confidence on the PM and every minister he appointed. The president, too, I believe.
We've shown we can get more votes than you.

by Slazliyka » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:42 pm
As I said, inactivity. You don't have more votes. You just have senators who happened to be active.
That would be true if the President didn't have the powers of veto.

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:44 pm
Slazliyka wrote:He can only veto something if it passed, and he'd be out of office before he could veto it if he lost a voe of no confidence.

by Slazliyka » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:46 pm
Well, we'd have to make sure that it doesn't happen now does it?

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:49 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:49 pm
Slazliyka wrote:The same way you made sure your PM was appointed?

by Slazliyka » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:50 pm

by Chetssaland » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:51 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 7:55 pm
Slazliyka wrote:Ah, glad to see you openly admit you're willing to circumvent democracy when it doesn't serve your interests.
Chetssaland wrote:Let's all take a step back here. We're not getting around the legislative process. If the opposition wants to clog up the government, they have that right, and we'll just have to find a way to fix things.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement