NCP is centrist.
LFP isn't as extreme as some make it out to be. The actual extremists split off a while ago and formed the Objectivist Party.
Advertisement

by Regnum Dominae » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:21 pm

by Chetssaland » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:24 pm

by Free South Califas » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:28 pm
Maklohi Vai wrote:Osea 767 wrote:I have recently set up the Association for the Defence of the Republic.
Link
Given the recent monarchy proposal, it’s purpose is fairly obvious. I wish to invite all members of this party to join it. In addition, I wish to form a tripartite leadership. Your party and the Red-Greens can each select someone to take up a position in our leading council, if you should wish to do so.
I will join, but I think membership should not be closed to only one member of this party.
Chetssaland wrote:Congrats to Geilinor (even though the process isn't over yet). A well-deserved appointment if you ask me.
Also, it was said earlier that the party is anti-space exploration. I don't know if that's correct, but if it is, I'd certainly like to see that change a little bit.
EDIT: Ahh, I see the process really IS far from over. That's disappointing that the two extremes banded together rather than accept someone from the middle.

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:29 pm

by Chetssaland » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:32 pm
Maklohi Vai wrote:Old Tyrannia just said the CMP will try and push one of their "flagship" policies into the coalition if they are indeed to join: viewtopic.php?p=15156740#p15156740
If the coalition becomes monarchist, I'm leaving this party unless it withdraws from the coalition. It's getting to be too much.

by Chetssaland » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:33 pm
Free South Califas wrote:Maklohi Vai wrote:I will join, but I think membership should not be closed to only one member of this party.
That's what he's saying, actually. Just that members of the association could then form a leadership council where each party could have part of the decision-making. I can't speak for Comrade Osea but I think the idea is to make sure one (present or future) party doesn't suddenly decide the association should only defend communism, or libertarianism, or should perhaps allow a taste of classical monarchy to strengthen the republic, or whatever you can imagine.Chetssaland wrote:Congrats to Geilinor (even though the process isn't over yet). A well-deserved appointment if you ask me.
Also, it was said earlier that the party is anti-space exploration. I don't know if that's correct, but if it is, I'd certainly like to see that change a little bit.
EDIT: Ahh, I see the process really IS far from over. That's disappointing that the two extremes banded together rather than accept someone from the middle.
Geilinor's political position is really not the issue, I'm sorry to say. It's a coalition motivated by anticommunism, despite your and other late groups' compass balancing effect. I don't mean to be argumentative, just help you understand why we would do such a thing.

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:33 pm

by Regnum Dominae » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:33 pm
Maklohi Vai wrote:Old Tyrannia just said the CMP will try and push one of their "flagship" policies into the coalition if they are indeed to join: viewtopic.php?p=15156740#p15156740
If the coalition becomes monarchist, I'm leaving this party unless it withdraws from the coalition. It's getting to be too much.

by Regnum Dominae » Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:55 pm
Regnum Dominae wrote:Maklohi Vai wrote:Old Tyrannia just said the CMP will try and push one of their "flagship" policies into the coalition if they are indeed to join: viewtopic.php?p=15156740#p15156740
If the coalition becomes monarchist, I'm leaving this party unless it withdraws from the coalition. It's getting to be too much.
If it becomes monarchist or officially social conservative, and the LFP doesn't leave, I'm going to split from the LFP and make a center right social liberal party.
You're not alone in this.

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:00 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:02 pm
Costa Alegria wrote:I'm getting sick of this fucking coalition. Maybe we should say either the CMP and the NFIP leave or we leave.

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:03 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:05 pm

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:13 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:14 pm
Beta Test wrote:I'm on the verge of pulling support for the Stanhelm Alliance.

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:15 pm

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:15 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:16 pm

by Costa Alegria » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:18 pm
Maklohi Vai wrote:What? I'm sorry, I don't understand this post. I've never been in favor of the SA coming into the coalition.

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:20 pm

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:40 pm

by Maklohi Vai » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:40 pm
Beta Test wrote:It's official. I no longer support the NIFP and CMP joining the coalition.
Old Tyrannia wrote:Well, so much for the Coalition, chaps.
Let's sit back and watch the republic tear itself apart.

by Beta Test » Sat Jun 22, 2013 4:43 pm

by Phocidaea » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:13 pm
by Ainin » Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:14 pm
Phocidaea wrote:Condolences to Geilinor on his imminent defeat in the confirmation defeat. And farewell to rationality and centrism; the radicals - left and right - have won.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement