For: 14
Against: 10
Approval: 58.33%
Advertisement

by Evraim » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:33 am

by Polvia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:34 am
Economic Left/Right: -9.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

by Oneracon » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:38 am
| April 21, 2013 at 6:55 AM | Central European Summer Time (UTC + 2) |
| April 21, 2013 at 5:55 AM | British Summer Time / Western European Summer Time (UTC + 1) |
| April 21, 2013 at 4:55 AM | Coordinated Universal Time / Greenwich Mean Time (UTC + 0) |
| April 21, 2013 at 12:55 AM | Eastern Daylight Time, US & Canada (UTC - 4) |
| April 20, 2013 at 11:55 PM | Central Daylight Time, US & Canada (UTC - 5) |
| April 20, 2013 at 9:55 PM | Pacific Daylight Time, US & Canada (UTC - 7) |
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Chestaan » Fri Apr 19, 2013 9:54 am

by Evraim » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:02 am
Uiiop wrote:I vote NAY
The chaos that might happen should be allowed because it was written in the OP.![]()
seriously it seems unlikely to happen and it would interesting and fun if it did so NAY.

by Great Nepal » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:13 am

by Reggae Magmia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:07 am

by Oneracon » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:17 am
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Benomia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:19 am
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:You've obviously never seen the Benomian M16A3s.
Carathon wrote:*Logs in with the name of Troll Alliance and writes a short app with poor grammar and logic.*Somehow genuinely surprised when denied*
Ragnarum wrote:Ragnarum transforms into a giant godzilla like creature, then walks into the sunset while emotional music plays and Morgan Freeman narrates.
Kouralia wrote:Everyone hates us: we're MMW. We're like the poster children of Realismfggtry.
Sauritican wrote:We've all been spending too much time with Ben

by Old Tyrannia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:20 am

by Evraim » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:27 am
Old Tyrannia wrote:Before casting my vote I'd like to hear the arguments for and against the bill.

by Bleckonia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:06 pm

by Bleckonia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:11 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Before casting my vote I'd like to hear the arguments for and against the bill.

by Oneracon » Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:22 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:33 pm

by Evraim » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:02 pm
Bleckonia wrote:For:
- if there are more than 200 members, voting and debating gets complicated.
- if there is a cap, parties can focus on Senate business rather than recruiting new Senators.
- a cap promotes stability, as there will be few structure changes in the Senate.
- it's hard to keep track of more than 200 nations
Against:
- a cap of 200 members prevents thousands of nations from participating.
- wait until there are more than 200 members and see what goes on
- ejecting Senators who are incapable of participating on a routine basis would limit the girth of experience enjoyed by the Senate as a whole
- the first-come, first-serve rule gives an undue advantage to older nations regardless of their relative ability
- more effectives methods of controlling the Senate exist, and many of these methods are less detrimental to pluralism and democracy

by Ceni » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:09 pm

by Othelos » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:09 pm

by Evraim » Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:12 pm
Othelos wrote:The reason I voted against is because the whole thing is unnecessary.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Slembana
Advertisement