Go find it yourself.I am too lazy to do it myself
And your* the one that will drive us into responding in aggression
* not you specifically
Advertisement

by CTALNH » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:56 pm

by Zweite Alaje » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:56 pm

by Divair » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:56 pm
CTALNH wrote:Go find it yourself.I am too lazy to do it myself
And your* the one that will drive us into responding in aggression
* not you specifically

by The Zeonic States » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:56 pm

by Divair » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:57 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:As HEAD of the NI’s Paramilitary Body and it’s General Commander under advisement from the Chairman I will state this for the record now.
As of Yet there is no defined chance or Plan in motion for the Body rebelling against Legislation that may or may not pass and outlaw it.
If it’s the will of the Senate then however much I may disagree with the Motion it will be received by the NI as we are an Official Political Entity and not a terrorist organization.
That said we will combat the motion and any attempt to weaken our parties ability to defend itself until such a time where it is no longer necessary.

by CTALNH » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:57 pm

by Kouralia » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:58 pm
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

by CTALNH » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:59 pm

by Divair » Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:59 pm

by New Freedomstan » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:00 pm


by CTALNH » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:02 pm
Divair wrote:CTALNH wrote:The hell it isn't.
My militia is the only keeping order and enforcing the laws you people vote
It isn't your militia and it isn't enforcing any laws, it's protecting a party. And a paramilitary ban would come after a police force is established simply due to the order of voting.Kouralia wrote:So, three or so months down the line?
How do you define a paramilitary? I can easily re-structure the PPF to retain it.
Not up to me, I'm not the one who'll draft a paramilitary ban.

by Arglorand » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:02 pm
Wolfmanne wrote:I wonder when I speak, do people think of me as one of the following:
1. The Enclave Wonderbolt from Fallout: Equestria in that flag of mine.
2. Billy Mays.
3. A dickhead.

by Great Nepal » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:03 pm
CTALNH wrote:Divair wrote:It isn't your militia and it isn't enforcing any laws, it's protecting a party. And a paramilitary ban would come after a police force is established simply due to the order of voting.
Not up to me, I'm not the one who'll draft a paramilitary ban.
Public safety
The People's Volunteer Militia are voluntary detachments for maintaining public order in the our country similar to the Neighborhood Watch.They work frequently in cooperation with the RFB Street Branch.

by Divair » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:03 pm
CTALNH wrote:Public safety
The People's Volunteer Militia are voluntary detachments for maintaining public order in the our country similar to the Neighborhood Watch.They work frequently in cooperation with the RFB Street Branch.
by Othelos » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:04 pm
Divair wrote:CTALNH wrote:Public safety
The People's Volunteer Militia are voluntary detachments for maintaining public order in the our country similar to the Neighborhood Watch.They work frequently in cooperation with the RFB Street Branch.
And have they been established by any government entity? Or even backed by any government entity? Or approved by OP? No? Then they're a bunch of vigilante lunatics running about pretending to be law enforcement when they're not.

by Glasgia » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:05 pm

by Divair » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:06 pm
Glasgia wrote:Can we, for the purposes of settling this dispute and to set up my history, assume that the British army are currently policing Aurentina beforre withdrawing when we've established our own laws? It would really help and stop our nation from being an anarcho-craphole.

by Wolfmanne » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:06 pm
Glasgia wrote:Can we, for the purposes of settling this dispute and to set up my history, assume that the British army are currently policing Aurentina beforre withdrawing when we've established our own laws? It would really help and stop our nation from being an anarcho-craphole.

by Great Nepal » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:06 pm
Glasgia wrote:Can we, for the purposes of settling this dispute and to set up my history, assume that the British army are currently policing Aurentina beforre withdrawing when we've established our own laws? It would really help and stop our nation from being an anarcho-craphole.

by The Zeonic States » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:07 pm
Glasgia wrote:Can we, for the purposes of settling this dispute and to set up my history, assume that the British army are currently policing Aurentina beforre withdrawing when we've established our own laws? It would really help and stop our nation from being an anarcho-craphole.

by Zweite Alaje » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:09 pm
The Zeonic States wrote:Glasgia wrote:Can we, for the purposes of settling this dispute and to set up my history, assume that the British army are currently policing Aurentina beforre withdrawing when we've established our own laws? It would really help and stop our nation from being an anarcho-craphole.
You propose placing our Nation under FOREIGN MARTIAL LAW.
Completely against this Insane Proposal.

by Great Nepal » Tue Apr 30, 2013 1:10 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement