Gordano and Lysandus wrote:It's the best we can do for now. The nation is in its governmental infancy and we must create a cooperative, compromising body to facilitate a firm foundation that can function for all - not just to cater to any one wing.
If one wing has a majority then the democratic thing to do is respect that the vote will go a certain direction. Even people of the same ideology disagree on many issues, so the idea of trying to eliminate the need for compromise, or alienate parties that actually pursue their agendas (be they Communist of CFE) is not right and, in my view, won't reach any positive conclusion.
Both you mentioned parties pursue their respective agendas, but have been able to show compromise to some extent, but it is a fact that in a multi-party democracy you will have parties that will not compromise on certain issues. It is just a part of democracy and pluralism.
I was around for the Left Alliance, and I can tell you that if left-wing ideologies in a single party collapsed then why should any less be expect from a coalition of right-wing and left-wing parties? Compromise is fine, but expecting everyone to compromise all the time is rather illogical.





