Hippostania wrote:I support the title of "Lord" or "High Lord" for the head of state, and "Chancellor" for the head of government.
Hereditary High Lord with some power and an elected chancellor?
Advertisement

by The Realm of God » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:35 pm
Hippostania wrote:I support the title of "Lord" or "High Lord" for the head of state, and "Chancellor" for the head of government.

by Oneracon » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:35 pm
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:36 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Hippostania » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:37 pm

by Cosara » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:38 pm

by Old Tyrannia » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:38 pm

by Cosara » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:38 pm
Hippostania wrote:The Realm of God wrote:
Hereditary High Lord with some power and an elected chancellor?
I personally don't think that the Chancellor should be chosen by a direct vote. He/she should act as the prime minister, meaning that the chairman of the largest party in the government would automatically be the Chancellor.

by The Realm of God » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:39 pm
Hippostania wrote:The Realm of God wrote:
Hereditary High Lord with some power and an elected chancellor?
I personally don't think that the Chancellor should be chosen by a direct vote. He/she should act as the prime minister, meaning that the chairman of the largest party in the government would automatically be the Chancellor.

by Great Nepal » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:39 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:His Most Excellent Majesty [NAME], by the grace of God Tisroc of [NATION], may he live forever!
Cosara wrote:I say we have a Monarch that will serve indefinitely until resignation, death (being inactive for a week or more without good reason) or removal by 2/3 vote of the Senate, and have a Chancellor who is elected by the Senate and serves a term of 1 month and shall be able to serve unlimited terms. The Chancellor can be removed from office by a Vote of No Confidence.

by Cosara » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:41 pm
Great Nepal wrote:Old Tyrannia wrote:His Most Excellent Majesty [NAME], by the grace of God Tisroc of [NATION], may he live forever!
No mention to god... this needs to be secular affair.Cosara wrote:I say we have a Monarch that will serve indefinitely until resignation, death (being inactive for a week or more without good reason) or removal by 2/3 vote of the Senate, and have a Chancellor who is elected by the Senate and serves a term of 1 month and shall be able to serve unlimited terms. The Chancellor can be removed from office by a Vote of No Confidence.
I agree in principle... just change the names.

by The Realm of God » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:41 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:42 pm
The Realm of God wrote:Hippostania wrote:I personally don't think that the Chancellor should be chosen by a direct vote. He/she should act as the prime minister, meaning that the chairman of the largest party in the government would automatically be the Chancellor.
Well that works. It stops the High Lord from having too much power by appointing his officials.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Cosara » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:43 pm
The Realm of God wrote:I really do not think we should use Roman titles it really makes the monarchy sound cheesy as a forty foot stilton.

by Gordano and Lysandus » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:43 pm

by Great Nepal » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:43 pm

by Old Tyrannia » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:43 pm

by Cosara » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:44 pm

by Great Nepal » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:44 pm

by The Realm of God » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:45 pm

by Old Tyrannia » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:45 pm

by Great Nepal » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:46 pm

by Gordano and Lysandus » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:47 pm

by Old Tyrannia » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:49 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:I really don't like Tisroc as a title.

by Great Nepal » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:50 pm

by Cosara » Sat Apr 20, 2013 12:51 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement