Typhlochactas wrote:What's with all the cussing? We don't say that shit in this thread!
Fuck you i do what i want and that includes swearing at you for no particular reason yeah anarchy for the fucking win motherfucker!
Advertisement
by San Leggera » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:07 pm
Typhlochactas wrote:What's with all the cussing? We don't say that shit in this thread!
by Ethel mermania » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:07 pm
by Typhlochactas » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:07 pm
by Hathradic States » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:08 pm
by Ethel mermania » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:08 pm
by Freedomina (Ancient) » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:08 pm
by DesAnges » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:09 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:12 pm
Typhlochactas wrote:What's with all the cussing? We don't say that shit in this thread!
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by The Holy Therns » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:13 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Typhlochactas wrote:What's with all the cussing? We don't say that shit in this thread!
Sometimes you've got blunt objects in this thread that want to make absolutely sure that everybody knows that they're blunt objects. So they start being blunt, followed by other people objecting the bluntness of the blunt object. This only emboldens the blunt object, because being told that he's a blunt object only confirms him in his bluntobjectivity. So he tries to outblunt his previous bluntness, now that he has an audience. Needless to say, bluntness ensues.
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Gaveo » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:14 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:Typhlochactas wrote:What's with all the cussing? We don't say that shit in this thread!
Sometimes you've got blunt objects in this thread that want to make absolutely sure that everybody knows that they're blunt objects. So they start being blunt, followed by other people objecting the bluntness of the blunt object. This only emboldens the blunt object, because being told that he's a blunt object only confirms him in his bluntobjectivity. So he tries to outblunt his previous bluntness, now that he has an audience. Needless to say, bluntness ensues.
by Gallup » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:14 pm
by Zweite Alaje » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:16 pm
by Umbra Ac Silentium » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:16 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Your thought pattern is so bizarre I can't even be offended anymore.
by Gallup » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:17 pm
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:17 pm
Gaveo wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Sometimes you've got blunt objects in this thread that want to make absolutely sure that everybody knows that they're blunt objects. So they start being blunt, followed by other people objecting the bluntness of the blunt object. This only emboldens the blunt object, because being told that he's a blunt object only confirms him in his bluntobjectivity. So he tries to outblunt his previous bluntness, now that he has an audience. Needless to say, bluntness ensues.
Jeez...
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Yoite » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:18 pm
Gaveo wrote:Hurdegaryp wrote:Sometimes you've got blunt objects in this thread that want to make absolutely sure that everybody knows that they're blunt objects. So they start being blunt, followed by other people objecting the bluntness of the blunt object. This only emboldens the blunt object, because being told that he's a blunt object only confirms him in his bluntobjectivity. So he tries to outblunt his previous bluntness, now that he has an audience. Needless to say, bluntness ensues.
Jeez...
by Hurdegaryp » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:20 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.
by Auremena » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:20 pm
by Yoite » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:23 pm
Auremena wrote:I have some answers, but I know one of which is false. I guess that last bit is why my stress hasn't decreased very much.
by Gaveo » Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:24 pm
Auremena wrote:I have some answers, but I know one of which is false. I guess that last bit is why my stress hasn't decreased very much.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement