Advertisement

by Super Bwitain » Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:32 am

by Cromarty » Wed Sep 12, 2012 8:57 am
Super Bwitain wrote: Don't buy the S*n.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack

by Super Bwitain » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:42 am

by Serrland » Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:36 am
Republic of Liberty and Freedom wrote:Osarius wrote:
There's nothing wrong with being an enforcer, or a water carrier.
It's like the difference between being a bouncer and a thug. Or between a workhorse and an aimlessly running twat.
Clattering opponents-guilty as charged
hoofing the ball away?-no pass to my midfield
Aimless running? I find right winger mark him out of the game,everytime he gets ball crunch him.Being bigger stronger an faster then pretty much everyone I play against helps though.
Our team man marks when we dont have the ball and smash the opposition when they have it.
As for thuggery? If your opponents are afraid or cant take you on physically you have already won the game

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Wed Sep 12, 2012 10:41 am
Serrland wrote:Republic of Liberty and Freedom wrote:Clattering opponents-guilty as charged
hoofing the ball away?-no pass to my midfield
Aimless running? I find right winger mark him out of the game,everytime he gets ball crunch him.Being bigger stronger an faster then pretty much everyone I play against helps though.
Our team man marks when we dont have the ball and smash the opposition when they have it.
As for thuggery? If your opponents are afraid or cant take you on physically you have already won the game
Well, see, my comment was about youth players. When you have nine year olds who are afraid to go play the game because of you, you're not some heroic defender. You're a fucking twat.


by Wopruthien » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:57 pm

by DesAnges » Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:59 pm
Wopruthien wrote:Got to say I'm quite surprised to hear you are all coaching under 12s with 11 A-side teams. I'v'e recently completed my Level 2 FA coaching badge and FA Youth Award level 1, and they were in the process of stamping out 11 a side football for all age groups until 13 years of age. They also implied they'd gotten rid of all leagues for those age groups and make football 'fun' instead of it being competitive and have overbearing parents/coaches.

by Serrland » Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:55 pm
Wopruthien wrote:Got to say I'm quite surprised to hear you are all coaching under 12s with 11 A-side teams. I'v'e recently completed my Level 2 FA coaching badge and FA Youth Award level 1, and they were in the process of stamping out 11 a side football for all age groups until 13 years of age. They also implied they'd gotten rid of all leagues for those age groups and make football 'fun' instead of it being competitive and have overbearing parents/coaches.
by Osarius » Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:23 pm
DesAnges wrote:It's not an immediate change, it's being phased in year by year. I think this year's u9s are the first that aren't allowed to be in a competitive league.

by Eastfield Lodge » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:25 pm

by Cyborg Holland » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:27 pm
Eastfield Lodge wrote:With Chelsea and Man City drawing, I get the distinct feeling none of the big teams actually want to win the title this season.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:07 pm


by Eastfield Lodge » Sat Sep 15, 2012 1:19 pm
Cyborg Holland wrote:Eastfield Lodge wrote:With Chelsea and Man City drawing, I get the distinct feeling none of the big teams actually want to win the title this season.
Yo know what this means...
All the Arsenal fans will get really excited that this year is our year, until 3/4s of the way through the season when City finally wake up

by I V Stalin » Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:02 am
Cyborg Holland wrote:Eastfield Lodge wrote:With Chelsea and Man City drawing, I get the distinct feeling none of the big teams actually want to win the title this season.
Yo know what this means...
All the Arsenal fans will get really excited that this year is our year, until 3/4s of the way through the season when City finally wake up

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:34 am
I V Stalin wrote:Cyborg Holland wrote:
Yo know what this means...
All the Arsenal fans will get really excited that this year is our year, until 3/4s of the way through the season when City finally wake up
I think Arsenal fans are actually vaguely realistic and realise that a good start doesn't mean we're going to win the league. Though ask me again if we win our next two league games.


by Forsher » Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:54 am
I V Stalin wrote:Cyborg Holland wrote:
Yo know what this means...
All the Arsenal fans will get really excited that this year is our year, until 3/4s of the way through the season when City finally wake up
I think Arsenal fans are actually vaguely realistic and realise that a good start doesn't mean we're going to win the league. Though ask me again if we win our next two league games.

by DesAnges » Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:52 am
Forsher wrote:I V Stalin wrote:I think Arsenal fans are actually vaguely realistic and realise that a good start doesn't mean we're going to win the league. Though ask me again if we win our next two league games.
I just decided to have a look at the BBC webbie this morning and I notice Wenger's suggesting that Arsenal can win. And who's to say? Liverpool have already not won one from the first three which I believe I read hasn't been done since 2003...

by I V Stalin » Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:09 am
Forsher wrote:I V Stalin wrote:I think Arsenal fans are actually vaguely realistic and realise that a good start doesn't mean we're going to win the league. Though ask me again if we win our next two league games.
I just decided to have a look at the BBC webbie this morning and I notice Wenger's suggesting that Arsenal can win. And who's to say? Liverpool have already not won one from the first three which I believe I read hasn't been done since 2003...

by Super Bwitain » Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:15 am
Slembana wrote:Liverpool are doing really badly. I think Man United will beat them next week.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:33 am

by Circle Of Dark » Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:18 pm
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:Try being a Leeds fan!

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:24 pm
Circle Of Dark wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:Try being a Leeds fan!
Theres always someone worse off.
**********
Pretty pleased Spurs finally got up and running today, though I'm not sure if it because we were really good or Reading were really bad - the quality of the opposition was somewhat questionable
by Osarius » Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:51 pm
Slembana wrote:Liverpool are doing really badly. I think Man United will beat them next week.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement