NATION

PASSWORD

Psychosomatic illnesses

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Galloisms Computer
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 42
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Galloisms Computer » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:34 am

Buffett and Colbert wrote:I find it amusing how you accuse us of sexism. I'd make a counter-argument, but I find it hard to concentrate with Ronald Reagan staring at my face.


Gorbachev had the same problem.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Bottle » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:34 am

United Dependencies wrote:Thirded but I don't see what is so scary.

The way people talk makes me feel like a feminist version of Ozzy Osbourne, who bites off the testicles of the bat instead of biting off the head.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Minnas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1705
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Minnas » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:35 am

Hiddenrun wrote:
Bottle wrote:
But hey, don't take my word for it. Feel free to keep thinking that you know women's minds better than the women themselves. Divorce lawyers need work just like everyone else these days.

Ah. I see. It offends your feminist sensibilities to have someone point out that your body aches for a child, even though your mind rebels.

Nowhere have I said it's wrong to overcome your biological urges. It's amusing however when some of you claim to be so special as to not have those urges at all. Veritable superwomen.


Hahahahaha! You're telling this Bottle. Well, Bottle, for example, has stated that as woman, time and time again, she doesn't want to have children. So you're telling Bottle that she knows shit about herself and that, since you hold all the knowledge in the world, she indeed wants a kid?

Yo Bottle, you don't know anything about yourself, according to the stellar rants of Hiddenrun. What do you think about that?
Take your time to trust in me,
and you will find
Infinity...

User avatar
Hiddenrun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1145
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Hiddenrun » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:35 am

In any case, I do apologize, as I had earlier stated I would bow out of this thread. Certain posters took that opportunity to come back, hours later, and flame me. I shouldn't have stooped to replying to such obvious baiting. I apologize for letting my annoyance interfere with my promise, good day.
Holder of unpopular opinions.

User avatar
Buffett and Colbert
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32382
Founded: Oct 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Buffett and Colbert » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:35 am

Megaloria wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:
I find it amusing how you accuse us of sexism. I'd make a counter-argument, but I find it hard to concentrate with Ronald Reagan staring at my face.


When you gaze into the abyss, etc...


That meritted a chuckle. :)
If the knowledge isn't useful, you haven't found the lesson yet. ~Iniika
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Clever, but your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me.

His Jedi mind tricks are insignificant compared to the power of Buffy's sex appeal.
Keronians wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:My law class took my virginity. And it was 100% consensual.

I accuse your precious law class of statutory rape.

User avatar
Smunkeeville
Minister
 
Posts: 2775
Founded: Aug 09, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Smunkeeville » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:35 am

Bottle wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Thirded but I don't see what is so scary.

The way people talk makes me feel like a feminist version of Ozzy Osbourne, who bites off the testicles of the bat instead of biting off the head.

Bat testes are really small, you should eat more dear, men don't like women who are stick thin.

Also, I don't think it's that you're an evil feminist, so much as you cut straight to the point. No flowery language. :clap:
"I like vacuuming, I find it cathartic. It's like I imagine all the people who tick me off being little pieces of lint and I'm sucking them up a tube into a vortex of terror, it's a healthy way to deal with my frustrations." - Smunkling, aged 8

User avatar
United Dependencies
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13659
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby United Dependencies » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:35 am

Bottle wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Thirded but I don't see what is so scary.

The way people talk makes me feel like a feminist version of Ozzy Osbourne, who bites off the testicles of the bat instead of biting off the head.

Ah yes I see.

Now I too am scared.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.

Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

This is Nationstates we're here to help

Are you a native or resident of North Carolina?

User avatar
Buffett and Colbert
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32382
Founded: Oct 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Buffett and Colbert » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:37 am

Hiddenrun wrote:In any case, I do apologize, as I had earlier stated I would bow out of this thread. Certain posters took that opportunity to come back, hours later, and flame me. I shouldn't have stooped to replying to such obvious baiting. I apologize for letting my annoyance interfere with my promise, good day.


:roll: Bye! :clap:
If the knowledge isn't useful, you haven't found the lesson yet. ~Iniika
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Clever, but your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me.

His Jedi mind tricks are insignificant compared to the power of Buffy's sex appeal.
Keronians wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:My law class took my virginity. And it was 100% consensual.

I accuse your precious law class of statutory rape.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Bottle » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:39 am

Minnas wrote:Hahahahaha! You're telling this Bottle. Well, Bottle, for example, has stated that as woman, time and time again, she doesn't want to have children. So you're telling Bottle that she knows shit about herself and that, since you hold all the knowledge in the world, she indeed wants a kid?

Yo Bottle, you don't know anything about yourself, according to the stellar rants of Hiddenrun. What do you think about that?

I think it's the same spiel I've heard from dozens of dudely dudes over the years. This case isn't even one of the more entertaining ones...my favorite was when I declined to set up a second date with a guy due to lack of chemistry between us, and he informed me that the real reason I wouldn't go out with him again must be because my "biological clock" was ticking and all I cared about was getting pregnant.

I was 19.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Minnas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1705
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Minnas » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:39 am

How old are you, Hiddenrun? 10? Re-read the parts you bolded and tell me, do you understand, really understand, what that person is saying? Read in between the lines, you obnoxious poster.

Here, let me help you:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:I'm not talking about my boyfriend's problems since I don't think I have one.


Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:At this moment, it's best if he doesn't consider me anything of his because I am unfit.


And in the end, this is neither your concern not anyone else's.
Last edited by Minnas on Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Take your time to trust in me,
and you will find
Infinity...

User avatar
Tiesabre
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1520
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Tiesabre » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:40 am

United Dependencies wrote:
Bottle wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Thirded but I don't see what is so scary.

The way people talk makes me feel like a feminist version of Ozzy Osbourne, who bites off the testicles of the bat instead of biting off the head.

Ah yes I see.

Now I too am scared.

Yeah, talk of biting off testicles makes any guy feel scared.

-covers self-
Psycho Baby: I find atheists who disparage others for believing are not any better than theists who try to shove it down others' throats.
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -6.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.26
Miss. Vivian Smith, Foreign Affairs-in-Chief and WA Ambassador

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Bottle » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:40 am

Minnas wrote:How old are you, Hiddenrun? 10? Re-read the parts you bolded and tell me, do you understand, really understand, what that person is saying? Read in between the lines, you obnoxious poster.

Sadly, I think I've run him off, so it's unlikely he'll be responding.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby North Suran » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:41 am

Galloisms Computer wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:I find it amusing how you accuse us of sexism. I'd make a counter-argument, but I find it hard to concentrate with Ronald Reagan staring at my face.

So THAT'S who that was.

I had my money on a wax mannequin version of Harvey Keitel.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Minnas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1705
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Minnas » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:42 am

Bottle wrote:
Minnas wrote:How old are you, Hiddenrun? 10? Re-read the parts you bolded and tell me, do you understand, really understand, what that person is saying? Read in between the lines, you obnoxious poster.

Sadly, I think I've run him off, so it's unlikely he'll be responding.


It doesn't really matter. All he did here was present his insecurites, didn't source shit and claimed he was "just being flamed'' for stating something.

Boohoo.
Take your time to trust in me,
and you will find
Infinity...

User avatar
Megaloria
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 452
Founded: Jul 07, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Megaloria » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:44 am

Bottle wrote:
Minnas wrote:Hahahahaha! You're telling this Bottle. Well, Bottle, for example, has stated that as woman, time and time again, she doesn't want to have children. So you're telling Bottle that she knows shit about herself and that, since you hold all the knowledge in the world, she indeed wants a kid?

Yo Bottle, you don't know anything about yourself, according to the stellar rants of Hiddenrun. What do you think about that?

I think it's the same spiel I've heard from dozens of dudely dudes over the years. This case isn't even one of the more entertaining ones...my favorite was when I declined to set up a second date with a guy due to lack of chemistry between us, and he informed me that the real reason I wouldn't go out with him again must be because my "biological clock" was ticking and all I cared about was getting pregnant.

I was 19.


Why would NOT going out with someone imply a need to get pregnant? I would think the opposite would be the case. Anyway, good on you for avoiding contact with someone who has no idea what he is talking about.
Here's to the losers, bless them all.

User avatar
Smunkeeville
Minister
 
Posts: 2775
Founded: Aug 09, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Smunkeeville » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:55 am

Megaloria wrote:
Bottle wrote:
Minnas wrote:Hahahahaha! You're telling this Bottle. Well, Bottle, for example, has stated that as woman, time and time again, she doesn't want to have children. So you're telling Bottle that she knows shit about herself and that, since you hold all the knowledge in the world, she indeed wants a kid?

Yo Bottle, you don't know anything about yourself, according to the stellar rants of Hiddenrun. What do you think about that?

I think it's the same spiel I've heard from dozens of dudely dudes over the years. This case isn't even one of the more entertaining ones...my favorite was when I declined to set up a second date with a guy due to lack of chemistry between us, and he informed me that the real reason I wouldn't go out with him again must be because my "biological clock" was ticking and all I cared about was getting pregnant.

I was 19.


Why would NOT going out with someone imply a need to get pregnant? I would think the opposite would be the case. Anyway, good on you for avoiding contact with someone who has no idea what he is talking about.

I like to call it Bro-logic. It's like the time that a guy dumped me because I wouldn't fuck him, and then called me a whore.
"I like vacuuming, I find it cathartic. It's like I imagine all the people who tick me off being little pieces of lint and I'm sucking them up a tube into a vortex of terror, it's a healthy way to deal with my frustrations." - Smunkling, aged 8

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202542
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:56 am

Hiddenrun wrote:I'm sure you just missed it. I don't believe for a moment that you read this and were just hoping you could claim it wasn't said.


I regret saying those things but it was how I felt last night. Undeniable. No one here, least of all you, have any right to judge me for this.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby North Suran » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:58 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Hiddenrun wrote:I'm sure you just missed it. I don't believe for a moment that you read this and were just hoping you could claim it wasn't said.


I regret saying those things but it was how I felt last night. Undeniable. No one here, least of all you, have any right to judge me for this.

But we can still judge you for the "otaku" thing, right?

Right?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202542
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:58 am

North Suran wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Hiddenrun wrote:I'm sure you just missed it. I don't believe for a moment that you read this and were just hoping you could claim it wasn't said.


I regret saying those things but it was how I felt last night. Undeniable. No one here, least of all you, have any right to judge me for this.

But we can still judge you for the "otaku" thing, right?

Right?


I promise, I will get you for this, nya!

8)
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:59 am

Smunkeeville wrote:
Megaloria wrote:
Bottle wrote:I think it's the same spiel I've heard from dozens of dudely dudes over the years. This case isn't even one of the more entertaining ones...my favorite was when I declined to set up a second date with a guy due to lack of chemistry between us, and he informed me that the real reason I wouldn't go out with him again must be because my "biological clock" was ticking and all I cared about was getting pregnant.

I was 19.


Why would NOT going out with someone imply a need to get pregnant? I would think the opposite would be the case. Anyway, good on you for avoiding contact with someone who has no idea what he is talking about.

I like to call it Bro-logic. It's like the time that a guy dumped me because I wouldn't fuck him, and then called me a whore.

Do not question Bro-logic it is always right.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Kryozerkia
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 11096
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Kryozerkia » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:14 am

Now that I have read through this thread and gone over ever inch of text, I have this to say. This has been significantly derailed because of the actions of Hiddenrun, who purposely baited the OP on the first page with his nonsense about some alleged boyfriend. His behaviour had caused a domino effect. All of his remarks toed the line and were at least nothing more than comments designed to bait the females who are posting here.

Hiddenrun, if you didn't want people to react badly then you should have double checked the nonsense that you spew about women because frankly, it was rather sexist in nature, which leads me to believe you intended to troll here. I suggest you wise up and fast.

Nanatsu no Tsuki, all I will say, is for your post (where you did a flame), I will only say this: I expect you to know better. If you're feeling emotional when you read something, hold out on clicking the submit button. Wait two minutes then look at what you wrote.
Problem to Report?
Game-side: Getting Help
Forum-side: Moderation
Technical issue/suggestion: Technical
A-well-a, don't you know about the bird
♦ Well, everybody knows that the bird is the word ♦
♦ A-well-a, bird, bird, b-bird's the word

Get the cheese to Sickbay

"Ok folks, show's over... Nothing to see here... Show's OH MY GOD! A horrible plane crash! Hey everybody, get a load of this flaming wreckage! Come on, crowd around, crowd around, don't be shy, crowd around!" -- Chief Wiggum

User avatar
Snafturi
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1356
Founded: Sep 19, 2006
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Snafturi » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:27 pm

Hiddenrun wrote:It seems as though you are unable to read. I pointed out that anyone who has had more than one relationship has, by definition, experienced a dysfunctional relationship. Else the relationship would not have ended. The poster I was responding to suggested that someone who has had a dysfunctional relationship could not comment therefore on any relationship. I brought up the point that it would be very odd indeed to only allow persons who have experienced perfection (ie, ONE relationship) to make such comments. Are you up to speed now?

That's not even remotely true. Two people can have a wonderful relationship that ends for one reason or another and it could have been completely healthy and successful.
[color=#000080]
The four most overrated things in life are champagne, lobsters,... and picnics -Hitchen

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Bottle » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:19 pm

Snafturi wrote:
Hiddenrun wrote:It seems as though you are unable to read. I pointed out that anyone who has had more than one relationship has, by definition, experienced a dysfunctional relationship. Else the relationship would not have ended. The poster I was responding to suggested that someone who has had a dysfunctional relationship could not comment therefore on any relationship. I brought up the point that it would be very odd indeed to only allow persons who have experienced perfection (ie, ONE relationship) to make such comments. Are you up to speed now?

That's not even remotely true. Two people can have a wonderful relationship that ends for one reason or another and it could have been completely healthy and successful.

Very true. There are plenty of "functional" reasons why a relationship might end. I actually think it's a major problem with the culture in my country (America) that we view any end to a relationship as a failure, while a relationship that is still together has not failed (at least not yet). In my experience, that's not a real correlation. Plenty of relationships are completely and utterly dysfunctional and failed but they endure for years on end, while other relationships are brief and end soon but were completely functional from beginning to end.

This actually can be linked right back to the topic I think, because the OP was basically about how perception may create reality. If relationships are perceived as only failing when they end, then that sets up a deeply sick culture for dating and sex. That creates a culture where ending a relationship is automatically a bad thing, a failure, regardless of the reasons for that ending. Because of this perception, people stay together far longer than they want to, and often far longer than is healthy for them, because they don't want to "fail" in their relationship. So because people are so determined to not have "failed" relationships, they end up remaining in genuinely failed relationships a helluva lot longer.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Minnas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1705
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Minnas » Thu Jul 30, 2009 2:58 pm

Bottle wrote:This actually can be linked right back to the topic I think, because the OP was basically about how perception may create reality. If relationships are perceived as only failing when they end, then that sets up a deeply sick culture for dating and sex. That creates a culture where ending a relationship is automatically a bad thing, a failure, regardless of the reasons for that ending. Because of this perception, people stay together far longer than they want to, and often far longer than is healthy for them, because they don't want to "fail" in their relationship. So because people are so determined to not have "failed" relationships, they end up remaining in genuinely failed relationships a helluva lot longer.


What concerns me is that the OP may think that because her situation seems like failure, only temporary, that she is incomplete and that no one can love her or appreciate her. That destroys and nothing can be further from the truth. A woman isn't just a woman because of her capacity to create life. A woman is so much more: daughter, sister, friend, student, worker, cousin, human.
Take your time to trust in me,
and you will find
Infinity...

User avatar
Buffett and Colbert
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32382
Founded: Oct 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Psychosomatic illnesses

Postby Buffett and Colbert » Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:00 pm

Minnas wrote:
Bottle wrote:This actually can be linked right back to the topic I think, because the OP was basically about how perception may create reality. If relationships are perceived as only failing when they end, then that sets up a deeply sick culture for dating and sex. That creates a culture where ending a relationship is automatically a bad thing, a failure, regardless of the reasons for that ending. Because of this perception, people stay together far longer than they want to, and often far longer than is healthy for them, because they don't want to "fail" in their relationship. So because people are so determined to not have "failed" relationships, they end up remaining in genuinely failed relationships a helluva lot longer.


What concerns me is that the OP may think that because her situation seems like failure, only temporary, that she is incomplete and that no one can love her or appreciate her. That destroys and nothing can be further from the truth. A woman isn't just a woman because of her capacity to create life. A woman is so much more: daughter, sister, friend, student, worker, cousin, human.


I have to say I do respect you much more now, Minnas.
If the knowledge isn't useful, you haven't found the lesson yet. ~Iniika
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Clever, but your Jedi mind tricks don't work on me.

His Jedi mind tricks are insignificant compared to the power of Buffy's sex appeal.
Keronians wrote:
Buffett and Colbert wrote:My law class took my virginity. And it was 100% consensual.

I accuse your precious law class of statutory rape.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bombe, Grinning Dragon, La Xingan Sports Association, Neu California, New haven america, Old Tyrannia, Union Hispanica de Naciones, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads