A general thread on Homosexuality, if you will.

[The Norwegian Blue]

I greatly enjoy thinking about cocks, and I'm pretty sure I'm a person. I could be wrong, though.

I thought you were female?

*world's saddest little rimshot noise goes here*

[Farnhamia]

I thought you were female?

I hear, in some cultures, females still count as 'people'.

*nods*

We should send Ann Coulter to invade those places, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity.

[South East Europe]

It should be required by law that all people have sex before they turn 21.

[South East Europe]

I hear, in some cultures, females still count as 'people'.

*nods*

We should send Ann Coulter to invade those places, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity.

But Ann Coulter isn't even human.

[Lackadaisical2]

We should send Ann Coulter to invade those places, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity.

But Ann Coulter isn't even human.

Some people claim shes a man.

[Grave_n_idle]

I hear, in some cultures, females still count as 'people'.

*nods*

We should send Ann Coulter to invade those places, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity.

I'm sorry, I can't think of anyone I hate enough to inflict Ann Coulter on.

[South East Europe]

But Ann Coulter isn't even human.

Some people claim shes a man.

Oh if she identifies as a woman then she's a woman.

[South East Europe]

We should send Ann Coulter to invade those places, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity.

I'm sorry, I can't think of anyone I hate enough to inflict Ann Coulter on.

I can't think of anyone I love enough to not inflict Ann Coulter on.

[Sdaeriji]

We should send Ann Coulter to invade those places, kill their leaders and convert them all to Christianity.

I'm sorry, I can't think of anyone I hate enough to inflict Ann Coulter on.

How about Ann Coulter?

[South East Europe]

I'm sorry, I can't think of anyone I hate enough to inflict Ann Coulter on.

How about Ann Coulter?

LOL

[Grave_n_idle]

I'm sorry, I can't think of anyone I hate enough to inflict Ann Coulter on.

How about Ann Coulter?

I was thinking about that, but I don't hate Ann Coulter.

But then, I don't actually hate syphilis, either.

It's just a horrible, disfiguring disease that makes people miserable and has no productive value of it's own.

Like syphilis.

[South East Europe]

How about Ann Coulter?

I was thinking about that, but I don't hate Ann Coulter.

But then, I don't actually hate syphilis, either.

It's just a horrible, disfiguring disease that makes people miserable and has no productive value of it's own.

Like syphilis.

Haha, that was totally epic.

[Kobeanare]

I thought you were female?

*world's saddest little rimshot noise goes here*

Come on, it was hilarious. Misogyny always is.

[Arkinesia]

I guess people don't like to think about cocks.

Speaking as someone who doesn't like to think about cocks.

I greatly enjoy thinking about cocks, and I'm pretty sure I'm a person. I could be wrong, though.

Well, I mean people in a general sense, as in, some people.

Not all

[Unhealthy2]

In the Church, it's believed that God created things for a reason (in this case sexual organs),

And yet the church also accepts evolution, which seems incompatible with the notion that god created all our various structures for a reason.

and using them for things they were not intended is wrong.

1) Why should using things in a different way than they were intended be wrong? Doesn't that make most creativity wrong? Doesn't that make most engineering wrong? We find new uses for old inventions and structures and ideas all the time. Don't knock it. It's one of the best ways of discovering new things. Hell, evolution is DRIVEN by finding new uses for old things. I guess the very process of evolution that god used to create us was evil then, right?

2) This presupposes that the church has magical access to god's intent for each organ. How do they know that god created the sexual organs ONLY for the purpose of procreation? How do they know that there aren't other uses?

[The Norwegian Blue]

*world's saddest little rimshot noise goes here*

Come on, it was hilarious. Misogyny always is.

I kinda chuckled and sighed simultaneously.

[Kobeanare]

Come on, it was hilarious. Misogyny always is.

I kinda chuckled and sighed simultaneously.

How on earth does one do that?

[The Norwegian Blue]

I kinda chuckled and sighed simultaneously.

How on earth does one do that?

It's one of those badass skills you get when you're a non-person.

[Kobeanare]

How on earth does one do that?

It's one of those badass skills you get when you're a non-person.

Right. Different biology. How silly of me to forget that.

[South East Europe]

I kinda chuckled and sighed simultaneously.

How on earth does one do that?

Um, by having sex with someone else...

[Unhealthy2]

Uh...I see your point, but no. Dictionary.

Can a man marry a man? No, only women are allowed to do that. Can a woman marry a woman? Nope, only men are allowed to marry women. Oh look, people are legally prevented from certain actions on the basis of their sexes. What's the word for that? Desalination? No wait, that's not it. Maybe discrimination? Yeah, I think that fits.

Why is this so hard to understand?

[Grave_n_idle]

In the Church, it's believed that God created things for a reason (in this case sexual organs),

And yet the church also accepts evolution, which seems incompatible with the notion that god created all our various structures for a reason.

and using them for things they were not intended is wrong.

1) Why should using things in a different way than they were intended be wrong? Doesn't that make most creativity wrong? Doesn't that make most engineering wrong? We find new uses for old inventions and structures and ideas all the time. Don't knock it. It's one of the best ways of discovering new things. Hell, evolution is DRIVEN by finding new uses for old things. I guess the very process of evolution that god used to create us was evil then, right?

2) This presupposes that the church has magical access to god's intent for each organ. How do they know that god created the sexual organs ONLY for the purpose of procreation? How do they know that there aren't other uses?

Clearly, since the prostate can only be directly stimulated via the anus, 'god' must have 'designed' us to take it up the bum.

In other words, if you're not taking it up the bum, you're not 'using things things for the reason they were created'.

*nods*

QED

[South East Europe]

It's one of those badass skills you get when you're a non-person.

Right. Different biology. How silly of me to forget that.

I'm a post-person.

[Kobeanare]

How on earth does one do that?

Um, by having sex with someone else...

What? How does that make any sense at all?

[South East Europe]

Clearly, since the prostate can only be directly stimulated via the anus, 'god' must have 'designed' us to take it up the bum.

Agreed