by Pure Metal » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:20 pm
by Fleckenstein » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:24 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:26 pm
by The South Islands » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:28 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:31 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Pure Metal » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:32 pm
greed and death wrote:pot is scary *nod*
by Kyronea » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:32 pm
Pure Metal wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTPsFIsxM3w
This made me laugh, so i thought i'd share it. I'm probably biased cos i'm an (ex-) pot-smoking, liberal hippie, but Amsterdam, and the rest of the Netherlands, rocks. I've been only twice, for a week at a time each*, but both times i found myself wanting to live there.
So, to make this less bloggy, what are your opinions on Amsterdam/The Netherlands and its relaxed attitude to sex, drugs and rock n roll? Do you agree that their "naive" experiments with "social tolerance, free drugs, free love" have created a "cesspool of corruption, crime... and anarchy"? What about y'all who live there?
*technically, the first time we stayed in Utrecht... which was even nicer than Amsterdam
by Mad hatters in jeans » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:34 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:34 pm
by BrightonBurg » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:37 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:40 pm
BrightonBurg wrote:Netherlands has not mattered in world affairs since the great tulip bubble burst of 1637,so who cares what Amsterdam says or thinks about 0'Reilly,they better worry less about weed,and more about the criminal aliens running amuck.
by The South Islands » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:40 pm
greed and death wrote:BrightonBurg wrote:Netherlands has not mattered in world affairs since the great tulip bubble burst of 1637,so who cares what Amsterdam says or thinks about 0'Reilly,they better worry less about weed,and more about the criminal aliens running amuck.
ahhh when also else fails blame illegal immigrants. Maybe deport a few American citizens by mistake.
by Greed and Death » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:48 pm
The South Islands wrote:greed and death wrote:BrightonBurg wrote:Netherlands has not mattered in world affairs since the great tulip bubble burst of 1637,so who cares what Amsterdam says or thinks about 0'Reilly,they better worry less about weed,and more about the criminal aliens running amuck.
ahhh when also else fails blame illegal immigrants. Maybe deport a few American citizens by mistake.
Fewer to cover with Social Security.
by Chrobalta » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:53 pm
by Hebalobia » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:53 pm
by Pedoka » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:37 pm
by Buffett and Colbert » Tue Jul 28, 2009 6:43 pm
Pedoka wrote:Bill's fears are certainly well founded when you have dirtbags like this trying to feed drug abuse to our children...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kssS_TEeQfU
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Port Arcana » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:10 pm
by Yootopia » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:14 pm
by Greed and Death » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:17 pm
Yootopia wrote:Yeah their journalism is pretty much pish. Was watching Fox And Friends yesterday morning and they were on about the dangers of texting in your car. General idea for that wee mini-news, fine. Main problem was that they seemed unsure of whether your risk of crashing was elevated 23% or 23 times by texting in your car throughout the segment. Pretty much a massive difference right there.
by Yootopia » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:17 pm
greed and death wrote:Yootopia wrote:Yeah their journalism is pretty much pish. Was watching Fox And Friends yesterday morning and they were on about the dangers of texting in your car. General idea for that wee mini-news, fine. Main problem was that they seemed unsure of whether your risk of crashing was elevated 23% or 23 times by texting in your car throughout the segment. Pretty much a massive difference right there.
you forgot the time when they said 23 magnitudes greater.
by Pedoka » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:20 pm
Yootopia wrote:Yeah their journalism is pretty much pish. Was watching Fox And Friends yesterday morning and they were on about the dangers of texting in your car. General idea for that wee mini-news, fine. Main problem was that they seemed unsure of whether your risk of crashing was elevated 23% or 23 times by texting in your car throughout the segment. Pretty much a massive difference right there.
by Yootopia » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:21 pm
Pedoka wrote:Yootopia wrote:Yeah their journalism is pretty much pish. Was watching Fox And Friends yesterday morning and they were on about the dangers of texting in your car. General idea for that wee mini-news, fine. Main problem was that they seemed unsure of whether your risk of crashing was elevated 23% or 23 times by texting in your car throughout the segment. Pretty much a massive difference right there.
Fox and friends isn't a news program... Its fox's equiv of good morning america.
by The South Islands » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:25 pm
by Pedoka » Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:26 pm
Yootopia wrote:Pedoka wrote:Yootopia wrote:Yeah their journalism is pretty much pish. Was watching Fox And Friends yesterday morning and they were on about the dangers of texting in your car. General idea for that wee mini-news, fine. Main problem was that they seemed unsure of whether your risk of crashing was elevated 23% or 23 times by texting in your car throughout the segment. Pretty much a massive difference right there.
Fox and friends isn't a news program... Its fox's equiv of good morning america.
It was trying to Do A News.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Jerzylvania, Keltionialang, Kowani, Plan Neonie, Rio Cana, Soviet Haaregrad, Talibanada, Tungstan
Advertisement