Advertisement

by Zeth Rekia » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:13 am

by Nullarni » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:13 am
Bottle wrote:Andaluciae wrote:While polygamy has been banned by the LDS church, the prejudice hasn't died.
Let's be clear on this:
Polygamy hasn't been banned by the LDS Church. Only EARTHLY polygamy has been banned, and to Mormons what happens on this Earth is far, far less important than the afterlife. In the afterlife, polygamy is still the rule. Each good Mormon man will be given his own planet to rule over, and will have "spirit wives" who bear him "spirit children" to populate that world. Polygamy is still a central and key element of mainstream Mormon theology.

by Bottle » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:23 am
Nullarni wrote:Bottle wrote:Let's be clear on this:
Polygamy hasn't been banned by the LDS Church. Only EARTHLY polygamy has been banned, and to Mormons what happens on this Earth is far, far less important than the afterlife. In the afterlife, polygamy is still the rule. Each good Mormon man will be given his own planet to rule over, and will have "spirit wives" who bear him "spirit children" to populate that world. Polygamy is still a central and key element of mainstream Mormon theology.
Laughable. Simply laughable. I suggest you stick to subjects that you are not completely ignorant of.

by Andaluciae » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:26 am
Bottle wrote:Andaluciae wrote:
Quite. I was focusing more heavily on tangible bits us merry non-Mormons.
Fair 'nuff. Personally, I'm just as squigged out by their current endorsement of eternal polygamy in heaven, but I realize I'm probably not typical of most Americans or the majority American view of Mormonism.
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

by Bottle » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:46 am
Andaluciae wrote:Bottle wrote:Fair 'nuff. Personally, I'm just as squigged out by their current endorsement of eternal polygamy in heaven, but I realize I'm probably not typical of most Americans or the majority American view of Mormonism.
Certainly can't blame you for the squigginess on that eternal polygamy bit. I didn't really know about that before...and it definitely creeps me out.
I mean, from my personal observations, we're all going to the exact same place when we die, Mormon, Atheist, Hindu, Catholic and David Hasselhoff:
Minneapolis.

by Iron Chariots » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:52 am

by Bottle » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:54 am

by SuperCoolPeoples » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:55 am
Harata wrote:I'm not really sure why so many people dislike Mormons. My parents really dislike Mormons, for some reason. Like I said to them, though, it wasn't radical Mormons who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks.

by Ashmoria » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:06 am
Bottle wrote:Ashmoria wrote:where do they get the unmarried dead women to be their extra wives?
They don't have to be dead women. See, in a Mormon marriage, you are "sealed" to your spouse, for "time and eternity." This means that in the afterlife, you'll still be married. (Indeed, for a Mormon woman to get into the good heaven, she must be called through the veil by her husband, who must be a priesthood holder, i.e. a good Mormon man.)
So, if a man's first wife dies and he later remarries, then in the eyes of the Mormons BOTH wives are the current wives of that man. That is the case for almost every apostle of the Mormon church right now. They fully expect to have multiple wives in heaven.
It doesn't work the other way, though. A Mormon woman may only be sealed to one man at a time. If a Mormon woman's husband dies and she later remarries, she has to get the original seal broken if she wants to be sealed to her new husband.
EDIT: This also works with divorce. If a Mormon couple divorces, and the man later remarries, he gets sealed to the new wife while retaining the seal to his old wife. So, in Heaven, he has two wives. However, if the woman wants to remarry in the temple, she must obtain a temple divorce to break the seal between her and the first husband. This is not easy to obtain (you have to get permission from one of the 12 apostles who run the church, among other things).

by Bottle » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:07 am
Ashmoria wrote:Bottle wrote:They don't have to be dead women. See, in a Mormon marriage, you are "sealed" to your spouse, for "time and eternity." This means that in the afterlife, you'll still be married. (Indeed, for a Mormon woman to get into the good heaven, she must be called through the veil by her husband, who must be a priesthood holder, i.e. a good Mormon man.)
So, if a man's first wife dies and he later remarries, then in the eyes of the Mormons BOTH wives are the current wives of that man. That is the case for almost every apostle of the Mormon church right now. They fully expect to have multiple wives in heaven.
It doesn't work the other way, though. A Mormon woman may only be sealed to one man at a time. If a Mormon woman's husband dies and she later remarries, she has to get the original seal broken if she wants to be sealed to her new husband.
EDIT: This also works with divorce. If a Mormon couple divorces, and the man later remarries, he gets sealed to the new wife while retaining the seal to his old wife. So, in Heaven, he has two wives. However, if the woman wants to remarry in the temple, she must obtain a temple divorce to break the seal between her and the first husband. This is not easy to obtain (you have to get permission from one of the 12 apostles who run the church, among other things).
so if a man is serious about building his future godhood he HAS to find a way to marry more than one woman during his life on earth..... problematical.

by Kazomal » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:08 am
Bottle wrote:Andaluciae wrote:While polygamy has been banned by the LDS church, the prejudice hasn't died.
Let's be clear on this:
Polygamy hasn't been banned by the LDS Church. Only EARTHLY polygamy has been banned, and to Mormons what happens on this Earth is far, far less important than the afterlife. In the afterlife, polygamy is still the rule. Each good Mormon man will be given his own planet to rule over, and will have "spirit wives" who bear him "spirit children" to populate that world. Polygamy is still a central and key element of mainstream Mormon theology.

by Bottle » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:11 am
Kazomal wrote:Bottle wrote:Let's be clear on this:
Polygamy hasn't been banned by the LDS Church. Only EARTHLY polygamy has been banned, and to Mormons what happens on this Earth is far, far less important than the afterlife. In the afterlife, polygamy is still the rule. Each good Mormon man will be given his own planet to rule over, and will have "spirit wives" who bear him "spirit children" to populate that world. Polygamy is still a central and key element of mainstream Mormon theology.
So you're pissed about something that, as far as you're concerned, doesn't even happen?
Kazomal wrote:How are they a direct threat to human rights here on earth?

by Kazomal » Wed Feb 16, 2011 8:33 am
Bottle wrote:Kazomal wrote:
So you're pissed about something that, as far as you're concerned, doesn't even happen?
Of course not. I find it obnoxious that Mormons routinely lie about their beliefs, and I think the Earthly results of their sexist doctrine are harmful to women, but I wouldn't even say that either of those really "piss me off" so much as just irritate me.Kazomal wrote:How are they a direct threat to human rights here on earth?
Their political activities directly interfere with the human rights of gay and female citizens of my country.

by Cool Egg Sandwich » Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:35 pm

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:42 pm
Kalibarr wrote:Today my friend said this to me when we were talking about a girl getting accepted to Brigham Young University
"I guess I don't believe in freedom of religion, because you know, they're just wrong"
Unfortunately I never got to finish the conversation, the bell rang and I had to get to a bus on the other side of the school.
Now, I'm an Atheist, and I honestly don't know a whole lot about Mormonism, or for that matter, even about what ever branch of Christianity my friend follows.
Now he is a pretty hardcore christian, but I've heard plenty of other people made nefarious comments about Mormons as well, even some who aren't all that religious.
Now, I kind of though interdenominational conflict was something mostly confined to the 16th and 17th centuries, and that the main aspect of Mormonism that other branches of christianity didn't like, polygamy, no longer exist in mainstream Mormanism, and for that matter hasn't for some time.
So, Why do people hate Mormons?
Do Mormons hate them back?
and perhaps a silly question, but
Is there a way to get people to be more tolerant?
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Cool Egg Sandwich » Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:50 pm

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:53 pm
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:Well Nanatsu, those 'polygamist scandals' are perpetrated by radical, extremist elements with the Mormon community. Saying that you don't like Mormons because of polygamy is like saying that you don't like Muslims because of suicide-bombing.
Rgds.,
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Sunny Marionette » Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:55 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:One time in India, I managed to draw an elaborate battle scene in the sand with my piss. Granted, my friends aided me in this matter, but we finished with Darth Vader force choking a random Jedi. It was one of the greatest achievements of our lives.

by Cool Egg Sandwich » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:02 pm
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:Well Nanatsu, those 'polygamist scandals' are perpetrated by radical, extremist elements with the Mormon community. Saying that you don't like Mormons because of polygamy is like saying that you don't like Muslims because of suicide-bombing.
Rgds.,
I don't hate the Mormons. In fact, if you read my post, I said I am indifferent to them. I was just giving speculated reasons, in my opinion, on why some may hate them. *shrug*

by Cool Egg Sandwich » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:03 pm
Sunny Marionette wrote:One of my best friends is Mormon, I don't hate her. Then again...she's not very strict. I think it's more of the strict Mormons that get on people's nerves because it's polygamy and all.

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:04 pm
Cool Egg Sandwich wrote:Sunny Marionette wrote:One of my best friends is Mormon, I don't hate her. Then again...she's not very strict. I think it's more of the strict Mormons that get on people's nerves because it's polygamy and all.
Read the thread please...
POLYGAMY is not mainstream Mormon custom / practice. It's a radical element within the community...
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by Rolamec » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:06 pm

by Cool Egg Sandwich » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:10 pm
Rolamec wrote:I dunno. Stereotypes of being polygamous? I mean anything that is new or misunderstood is viewed as strange (*cough* Roman Catholicism in the 1930s-1960s). I don't hate Mormons, a good friend of mine since I've known since childhood, who was like a grandfather, was a Mormon, he passed away recently from lung cancer. He was a nice guy, just trying to do the honest and right thing.
I wouldn't say Mormons are discriminated as much as Scientologists are. But really most Christian denominations have opinions about each other. Most evanglicals or "hard core" Christians don't view Catholicism as being Christian.
by The Matthew Islands » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:13 pm
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, El Lazaro, Point Blob, Port Caverton, Socianesia
Advertisement