Yes! You can call it whatever you want, but on maps and to the most of the rest of the world its Istanbul.
Advertisement

by Forlon » Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:43 am

by Rolamec » Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:46 am

by The Archregimancy » Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:47 am
Coccygia wrote:
I might also have mentioned China itself, which has not called itself anything like that since the fall of the Qin dynasty (Qin>China) ca. 200 BC, if it ever even did. As no doubt you know, it calls itself Jongguo, the Middle Kingdom (in the middle between Heaven and us barbarians, that is, not the middle of the Earth) and the people (and anything else Chinese) are Han, after the dynasty that succeeded the Qin. The term Qin was used for China because, I guess, that's when Greek traders first encountered China (or else the Qin emperor insisted on the term).
This [Qin] is often proposed as the etymology for the name China, a name that seems to have reached the West through Persian and Italian. But the Chinese use rather the names of the Han or Tang dynasties as the name of their nation, and the form of the name suggests that it is derived from the Sanskrit name, Cina. This applied mainly to the area of Tibet, though also on occasions included Assam and Burma (Sircar 1971: 104-5). China as a whole was known to the Indians as Mahacina, 'Great China': this, for example, is where the Chinese pilgrim Xuan Zang told the Indians where he was from when he visited in 629.

by Feral Land » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:01 am

by Coccygia » Mon Feb 28, 2011 5:59 pm


by Tekke » Tue Jun 28, 2011 12:33 am
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Forsher, Free Stalliongrad, Improper Classifications, Kekian Republic, Outer Sparta, Tarsonis
Advertisement