Advertisement

by Nova-Byzantine » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:39 pm

by Ceannairceach » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:39 pm
Nova-Byzantine wrote:Constantinople all the way!
Reclaim the city for the Greeks!

by Innsmothe » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:44 pm

by Ulthran Imperia Admin » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:44 pm

by Ceannairceach » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:45 pm
Ulthran Imperia Admin wrote:I prefer Constantinople, always have, always will...Although Byzantium in the modern world would be pretty mint.
and when it comes to the Greeks ownership, i have only three words, used famously in many different scenarios:
"TAKE IT BACK!"

by Ulthran Imperia Admin » Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:48 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Ulthran Imperia Admin wrote:I prefer Constantinople, always have, always will...Although Byzantium in the modern world would be pretty mint.
and when it comes to the Greeks ownership, i have only three words, used famously in many different scenarios:
"TAKE IT BACK!"
Perhaps if the Greeks ever actually owned it, they would have some claim...

by Coccygia » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:03 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Ulthran Imperia Admin wrote:I prefer Constantinople, always have, always will...Although Byzantium in the modern world would be pretty mint.
and when it comes to the Greeks ownership, i have only three words, used famously in many different scenarios:
"TAKE IT BACK!"
Perhaps if the Greeks ever actually owned it, they would have some claim...

by Ceannairceach » Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:15 pm

by Dazchan » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:30 pm

by Northern Rangeria » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:47 pm

by Farnhamia » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:50 pm
Northern Rangeria wrote:Istanbul when talking about the city post-1453.
Constantinople when talking about the city as established by Emperor Constantine.
Byzantium when talking about the city before Constantine.

by Ceannairceach » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:55 pm

by Northern Rangeria » Sun Feb 20, 2011 4:56 pm

by United Dependencies » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:25 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by Ceannairceach » Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:26 pm

by Kalaspia-Shimarata » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:23 am

by The Soviet Technocracy » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:27 am
Innsmothe wrote:Istanbul.
The Ottomans are way more cultured than some barbarian Greeks playing at being roman.

by The Archregimancy » Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:15 am
Dazchan wrote:So your argument is that countries have one name in one language and another name in another? I'm pretty sure that the country in question decded to be known officially as Georgia in the English-speaking world.
Just like Turkey decided that its city name is Istanbul.
The Archregimancy wrote:1) It's hardly unique for a city to be called one name in one language, and another name in another. That Welsh-speakers, for example, refer to "York" as "Caer Efrog" - a name the city hasn't been called by its residents for some 1500 years - doesn't make the Welsh sound ignorant about the World; it merely signals that they still use an older name in their own language. This is hardly unique. Many Transylvanian towns have three names: one each in Romanian, Hungarian, and German; Sibiu, for example, is also known as Hermannstadt (German) and Nagyszeben (Hungarian). Thus "Konstantinúpolis" in Greek, and "Istanbul" in Turkish; or indeed "Carigrad" in Slovene, "Mikligarður" in Icelandic, or "Tsarigrad" in Bulgarian. Do you consider Slovenes, Icelanders and Bulgarians to be ignorant about the world?
2) The senior hierarch of the Orthodox Church, who resides in Istanbul, is still known as "The Patriarch of Constantinople" in both formal and informal usage, even in English. As most Greeks are Orthodox, it is wholly appropriate for them to refer to 'Constantinople' when discussing ecclesiastical matters in either Greek or English.

by Rethymnon » Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:01 am


by Innsmothe » Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:05 am
Rethymnon wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Imperium Romanum owned it, but not the current nation of Greece.
"The current nation of Greece" I truly hate it, when people say that
Well yeah, you are right. Its not Greece that controlled the city, never. It was the Greeks who did. After all Greece is a western name. Regardless of how you chose to call us we call ourselves the same since ancient times ( Romioi and Hellenes ) and Hellada ( the name of Greece in Greek ) was a theme of the Byzantine Empire ( themes were like provinces ). Modern Greece is the people of Byzantium ( the original people ) who rebelled and made the new nation. Also the title for Emperor in Byzantium was not Imperator Romanorum like in Rome but Vasilefs and Aftokrator which are Greek titles. The official language was Greek and all the dynasties of Emperors after emperor Heraklios ( 8th century ) were Greek from Mainland Greece, Asia Minor, Alexandria and many other then-Greek cities and lands. Bottom line : Yes we owned the city for centuries and yes, we call it Constantinopolis still, and await the time when we will get it back ( i mean...you never know, right? ).

by Rethymnon » Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:09 am

by Innsmothe » Tue Feb 22, 2011 4:10 am

by Soviet Haaregrad » Tue Feb 22, 2011 6:19 am
Nova-Byzantine wrote:Constantinople all the way!
Reclaim the city for the Greeks!

by Rethymnon » Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:16 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Drongonia, Fractalnavel, Gun Manufacturers, Independent Galactic States
Advertisement