NATION

PASSWORD

Constantinople or Istanbul what do you call it?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Constantinople or Istanbul what do you call it?

Constantinople
130
38%
Istanbul
160
47%
Byzantium
49
14%
 
Total votes : 339

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:16 am

Kinlorne wrote:I was going to Turkey with my family and my sister was asking where we could go and she said both Istanbul and Constantinople,i of course quickly told her otherwise. :]

:rofl:
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:16 am

Mosasauria wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
You don't know much about history, do you? :roll:

The city belongs to the Turks. They get to name it whatever they want. They named it Istanbul. That is the name the world refers to it as. End of story.

Constantine died centuries ago, and the city has belonged to the Turks for years. No amount of historical wankering on your part will change that.

Win. Although I call it Byzantium...


Which is sort of silly, Tobi. The city hasn't been known as Byzantium for centuries.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Zhenghou
Diplomat
 
Posts: 742
Founded: Feb 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zhenghou » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:17 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Zhenghou wrote:
I'm not tirading, it is Constantinople since Constantine founded the city and that is that, the Turkish have no right to call it anything but, okay, and I don't mean to upset you, I am just trying to teach you something new. :roll:


You don't know much about history, do you? :roll:

The city belongs to the Turks. They get to name it whatever they want. They named it Istanbul. That is the name the world refers to it as. End of story.

Constantine died centuries ago, and the city has belonged to the Turks for years. No amount of historical wankering on your part will change that.


No Nana, Constantinople is still alive in the minds of many caring people, It is the Chritian name, the reliable name, the Turks can say whatever they want, but that doesn't make it correct. :roll:
Emperor of Zhenghou: Wao tze

League of Monarchist States Stuff
Zhenghou: Founder and Lord Protector
Link http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95492

Hetalia Allies
America
France
Italy

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:17 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:Win. Although I call it Byzantium...


Which is sort of silly, Tobi. The city hasn't been known as Byzantium for centuries.

That is what it was established as.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:18 am

Zhenghou wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
You don't know much about history, do you? :roll:

The city belongs to the Turks. They get to name it whatever they want. They named it Istanbul. That is the name the world refers to it as. End of story.

Constantine died centuries ago, and the city has belonged to the Turks for years. No amount of historical wankering on your part will change that.


No Nana, Constantinople is still alive in the minds of many caring people, It is the Chritian name, the reliable name, the Turks can say whatever they want, but that doesn't make it correct. :roll:


LOL! :rofl:

It is correct of the Turks to call it Istanbul. They own the city. Once again, no amount of historical or emotional wankering changes that.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Zhenghou
Diplomat
 
Posts: 742
Founded: Feb 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zhenghou » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:20 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Zhenghou wrote:
No Nana, Constantinople is still alive in the minds of many caring people, It is the Chritian name, the reliable name, the Turks can say whatever they want, but that doesn't make it correct. :roll:


LOL! :rofl:

It is correct of the Turks to call it Istanbul. They own the city. Once again, no amount of historical or emotional wankering changes that.


I respect your point of view, and you make a great arguement, but I am afraid the city's Western name is Constantinople. :hug:
Emperor of Zhenghou: Wao tze

League of Monarchist States Stuff
Zhenghou: Founder and Lord Protector
Link http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95492

Hetalia Allies
America
France
Italy

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:20 am

Mosasauria wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Which is sort of silly, Tobi. The city hasn't been known as Byzantium for centuries.

That is what it was established as.


Established, past tense. The city has belonged to the Turks for many years. It's as silly as me trying to call Andalusia, Spain, as Al-Andaluz when that city hasn't been a Moorish possession since the mid 1400s. Spain reclaimed it back, renamed it, so Andalusia it is.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:21 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:That is what it was established as.


Established, past tense. The city has belonged to the Turks for many years. It's as silly as me trying to call Andalusia, Spain, as Al-Andaluz when that city hasn't been a Moorish possession since the mid 1400s. Spain reclaimed it back, renamed it, so Andalusia it is.

Does it really affect people when I call it Byzantium? I know its synonyms, so do I need to change what I call it?
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Angleter
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12359
Founded: Apr 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Angleter » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:22 am

Zhenghou wrote:Constantinople,
It is grossly incorrect to use the so called name "Istanbul" that name is associate with the Ottoman Captors, who turned the great city backward, and hated Christianity. Constantinople was in existence first.


The Ottomans named it Konstantiniyye. Only Ataturk- a man for whom I have the least love- renamed it Istanbul.
[align=center]"I gotta tell you, this is just crazy, huh! This is just nuts, OK! Jeezo man."

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:22 am

Zhenghou wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
LOL! :rofl:

It is correct of the Turks to call it Istanbul. They own the city. Once again, no amount of historical or emotional wankering changes that.


I respect your point of view, and you make a great arguement, but I am afraid the city's Western name is Constantinople. :hug:


Em, no, it isn't. The West knows it as Istanbul since that is the name given to it by the Turkish government, which owns the city. A government that is recognized as legitimate.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Zhenghou
Diplomat
 
Posts: 742
Founded: Feb 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zhenghou » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:22 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:That is what it was established as.


Established, past tense. The city has belonged to the Turks for many years. It's as silly as me trying to call Andalusia, Spain, as Al-Andaluz when that city hasn't been a Moorish possession since the mid 1400s. Spain reclaimed it back, renamed it, so Andalusia it is.


Well, Andalusia is legitimate since it was based on the infindel name and is universally used. People still legitimately call Constantinople Constantinople
Emperor of Zhenghou: Wao tze

League of Monarchist States Stuff
Zhenghou: Founder and Lord Protector
Link http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95492

Hetalia Allies
America
France
Italy

User avatar
Yoneyistan
Secretary
 
Posts: 33
Founded: Oct 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Yoneyistan » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:23 am

I was born in Istanbul and I've been living here since then. AND I've never been able to understand this thing at all. Resisting on using a former name looks nothing more than being childish.

User avatar
Zhenghou
Diplomat
 
Posts: 742
Founded: Feb 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zhenghou » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:24 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Zhenghou wrote:
I respect your point of view, and you make a great arguement, but I am afraid the city's Western name is Constantinople. :hug:


Em, no, it isn't. The West knows it as Istanbul since that is the name given to it by the Turkish government, which owns the city. A government that is recognized as legitimate.


Well Nana, I agree withyour point but Constantinople was only recently renamed and Constantinople is associated with most of the city: e.g Hagia Sophia
Emperor of Zhenghou: Wao tze

League of Monarchist States Stuff
Zhenghou: Founder and Lord Protector
Link http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95492

Hetalia Allies
America
France
Italy

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:24 am

Mosasauria wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Established, past tense. The city has belonged to the Turks for many years. It's as silly as me trying to call Andalusia, Spain, as Al-Andaluz when that city hasn't been a Moorish possession since the mid 1400s. Spain reclaimed it back, renamed it, so Andalusia it is.

Does it really affect people when I call it Byzantium? I know its synonyms, so do I need to change what I call it?


You can keep calling it as that, however, it is nevertheless silly to. The city is named Istanbul in modern times, calling it Byzantium or Constantinople is... well... superfluous unless you're applying a specific context.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Zhenghou
Diplomat
 
Posts: 742
Founded: Feb 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zhenghou » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:24 am

Yoneyistan wrote:I was born in Istanbul and I've been living here since then. AND I've never been able to understand this thing at all. Resisting on using a former name looks nothing more than being childish.


No, the infindels named it Istanbul
Emperor of Zhenghou: Wao tze

League of Monarchist States Stuff
Zhenghou: Founder and Lord Protector
Link http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=95492

Hetalia Allies
America
France
Italy

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:26 am

Yoneyistan wrote:I was born in Istanbul and I've been living here since then. AND I've never been able to understand this thing at all. Resisting on using a former name looks nothing more than being childish.


As I said it is just wankering. Everybody knows that the name the city goes by now is Istanbul. Why call it Byzantium or Constantinople is incredibly silly to me? I am an art history student, and unless I am discussing the period in history where the city was called Byzantium or Constantinople, I refer to it as Istanbul because that is its name.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
United Mercenary Firms
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 420
Founded: Nov 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby United Mercenary Firms » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:28 am

Yoneyistan wrote:I was born in Istanbul and I've been living here since then. AND I've never been able to understand this thing at all. Resisting on using a former name looks nothing more than being childish.


It's just been called Constantinople for over thousand years, and only Istanbul for roughly a hundred years or so. People are still trying to adjust, especially the Greeks and other native Thracian Europeans who were kicked out by the Turkish government from their own historical homeland simply because they happened to live near Constantinople, which is now part of Turkey and called Stamboul (Istanbul).

It's really just a name, that city will always be a city.
Last edited by United Mercenary Firms on Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private Military Contractors are not heroes; we are businessmen. I am one -- and I do it for the money - nothing else. The only loyalty I have is to those fellow contractors whom I serve with and work for and I do not work for any other country but my own. That's it. Do we do risky heroic stuff daily? You bet! But if the paycheck stopped I would move on. Soldiers are the heroes. I was one and they sent me where they wanted and when for chicken feed. Now I get to choose.
--Best Comment ever.

User avatar
Selung
Envoy
 
Posts: 218
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Selung » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:29 am

Depending on the historical period I use all three. When referring to it in present time I use Istanbul.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:31 am

Zhenghou wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Em, no, it isn't. The West knows it as Istanbul since that is the name given to it by the Turkish government, which owns the city. A government that is recognized as legitimate.


Well Nana, I agree withyour point but Constantinople was only recently renamed and Constantinople is associated with most of the city: e.g Hagia Sophia


1930, to be more specific. A name given to the city by a legitimate government. And if you want a deeper story, the Turks were referring to the city as Istanbul even before the conquest of 1453.

İstanbul was the common name for the city in normal speech in Turkish even before the conquest of 1453... (1)


Hagia Sofia was a mosque for a long time, until it was turned into a museum in 1933.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:32 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:Does it really affect people when I call it Byzantium? I know its synonyms, so do I need to change what I call it?


You can keep calling it as that, however, it is nevertheless silly to. The city is named Istanbul in modern times, calling it Byzantium or Constantinople is... well... superfluous unless you're applying a specific context.

You're talking to a person who strives to be odd and superfluous.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:32 am

Zhenghou wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Em, no, it isn't. The West knows it as Istanbul since that is the name given to it by the Turkish government, which owns the city. A government that is recognized as legitimate.


Well Nana, I agree withyour point but Constantinople was only recently renamed and Constantinople is associated with most of the city: e.g Hagia Sophia


1930, to be more specific. A name given to the city by a legitimate government. And if you want a deeper story, the Turks were referring to the city as Istanbul even before the conquest of 1453.

İstanbul was the common name for the city in normal speech in Turkish even before the conquest of 1453... (1)


Hagia Sofia, after the Turkish conquest of 1453, was a mosque for a long time, until it was turned into a museum in 1933.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
New Vaduz
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 144
Founded: Nov 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby New Vaduz » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:32 am

Constantinople is just a local name now, and a few Christians use it, especially among the Greeks and other Balkan peoples, who regard the very name 'Constantinople' and its colorful Byzantine history as a big part of their culture and such.

Istanbul is the official name and probably the most widely-recognized. The Muslims use it a lot, but actually, most of these traditionally Muslim nations called it Constantinople for as long as the Europeans did. Istanbul just sounds better as a Turkish name, since now it is part of Turkey, and no doubt always will be.
Byzantium, the eternal. The unchanging. The centre of the world. Sprawling empire that was born of Greece and Rome, surpassing even that ancient glory. For over 1,000 years the heirs of the Caesars ruled from their capital on the Bosphorus. There were dark days of terror and despair, many lands were lost to foes, but in the end the triumph was theirs. An empire that was lost, had been regained. A flame long snuffed out, was rekindled. A glory once tarnished, had been reborn.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:33 am

Mosasauria wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
You can keep calling it as that, however, it is nevertheless silly to. The city is named Istanbul in modern times, calling it Byzantium or Constantinople is... well... superfluous unless you're applying a specific context.

You're talking to a person who strives to be odd and superfluous.


Kudos on your goals, but that doesn't make your point on this thread any less faulty.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Chrobalta
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5324
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chrobalta » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:34 am

United Mercenary Firms wrote:
Yoneyistan wrote:I was born in Istanbul and I've been living here since then. AND I've never been able to understand this thing at all. Resisting on using a former name looks nothing more than being childish.


It's just been called Constantinople for over thousand years, and only Istanbul for roughly a hundred years or so. People are still trying to adjust, especially the Greeks and other native Thracian Europeans who were kicked out by the Turkish government from their own historical homeland simply because they happened to live near Constantinople, which is now part of Turkey and called Stamboul (Istanbul).

It's really just a name, that city will always be a city.

Trying to adjust? No they are just resistant to change.


The whole matter is quite silly. Its name is "Istanbul" and people should just go with it.
Democratic Socialist
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.79

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:34 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Mosasauria wrote:You're talking to a person who strives to be odd and superfluous.


Kudos on your goals, but that doesn't make your point on this thread any less faulty.

True.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Drongonia, Fractalnavel, Gun Manufacturers, Independent Galactic States

Advertisement

Remove ads