Advertisement
by NERVUN » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:23 pm
by Russiaria » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:23 pm
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:The Travuersan Union wrote:It is still an oxymoron to ban swastikas but allow Nazism.
So?Russiaria wrote:almost every single nation in human history has done at least one thing that's horrible. however there are a few nations (like the Nazis) who have done something even more horrible and inhuman than others, so their flag is seen as a hate symbol. Soviet russia is not one of these nations. nor is the ottoman turks.
Actually under Stalin the Soviet Union killed more than twice what was killed in the holocaust.
by The Murtunian Tribes » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:24 pm
by Verlan » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:25 pm
by The Travuersan Union » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:29 pm
NERVUN wrote:Just to correct you, there are a number of nations RPing Nazism. We don't ban that. We do ban the swastikas because, again, they do nothing but cause trouble.
by Greater Tezdrian » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:31 pm
by Pokemonman » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:31 pm
Since offensive flags and the like are banned, specifically the swastika, why aren't communist flags banned as well?
Being a Tibetan Buddhist and having visited China, Nepal, Thailand, and the Philippines, I can sufficiently say that the swastika is a legitimate eastern religious symbol of rather inspiring proportions.
Also, I assume that the swastika is found offensive b/c of it's ties to the holocaust. Why aren't the flags of the USSR and PRC banned as well? The Soviet Union and the PRC both committed disgusting crimes against humanity on the scale that the Nazi regime perpetrated. You could deny this and believe that these states are/were worker's paradises but I don't deny the holocaust...
by Russiaria » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:34 pm
NERVUN wrote:The whole bit has been addressed in The One-Stop Rules Shop. It boils down to this. Max said no. The people who use that symbol tend to use it in a manner which just causes trouble. Even if they don't people go looking for them to cause trouble. Since he pays the bills and doesn't want the trouble, there you are.
by Banold » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:35 pm
1.) Allow swastikas and allow Nazism
by NERVUN » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:49 pm
Banold wrote:1.) Allow swastikas and allow Nazism
^^^This would be the policy concerning the game which makes most sense to me. I would hope other thinking people agree as well. But as I well know, I don't run this place.
The whole issue is not what is actually offensive but rather that the policy set is silly, illogical, and irrational.
I understand Max Berry has a right to be all these things and I support his right to choose his position. It's just that to me, it makes no sense in a nation-building/role playing game.
I'm not even asking for a change in policy, just what is thought about it. Surely we can still discuss our feelings?
by The Truth and Light » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:50 pm
Rokartian States wrote:Discord caused by the existence of extremist symbols is not worth curing?
Rokartian States wrote:Could you provide an example please?
Rokartian States wrote:I'm okay with that.
by Rokartian States » Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:56 pm
Before you were worried about offending people. Now it's discord.
Rokartian States wrote:Could you provide an example please?
I don't have to. Assuming that every Nazi is extreme is No True Scotsman.
Rokartian States wrote:I'm okay with that.
Whatever.
Southern United Africa wrote:Say "pray" over and over in quick succession. I dare you.
Jobbla wrote:hey dude my bitch is a mod on this site shes gonna punish you for squealing on me!
Norstal wrote:That is egotistical on so many level. Its like 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon, except theres one 1 degree and its your ego.
Sozut wrote:IT IS DEFINITELY BIRDS!
Sibirsky wrote:The truth is, you ideology has failed, will continue to fail, and is made of fail.
Embrihated Koalas wrote:SO THEIR BALLS ARE INERT
Cnetral america wrote:you have int got the flu soooo long it cagt you up
:geek:
by The Truth and Light » Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:00 pm
Rokartian States wrote:The Truth and Light wrote:That's a completely different excuse than before.
So when somebody provides a reason for an opinion that opposes your views, it's an excuse?Before you were worried about offending people. Now it's discord.
The problem with offending people is that it causes discord.I don't have to. Assuming that every Nazi is extreme is No True Scotsman.
No it isn't. Unless you disagree that creating policies based on biological racism is extreme, Nazism is, by definition, extreme.Whatever.
I wasn't just trying to blow you off, by the way. If banning the use of swastikas is antiliberty, then so too is legislation against murder.
by Nobel Hobos » Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:15 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Actually considering the environment of Nationstates, political, moral and ethical controversy seems to be a staple pf the attention seeker. I suspect the only reason why Max singled out the swastika is because it's too easy. It's like running into a fancy restaurant and shouting 'PUBES!'.
by New Korongo » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:34 pm
by Nobel Hobos » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:45 pm
New Korongo wrote:Why is the christian cross not banned?
Katganistan wrote:Obscene and Explicit Content: Sexually graphic images and posts, and violent images such as bloody corpses. Very strictly forbidden. Obscene imagery and content in the forums should be reported to the Moderation Forum. Please provide a link to the topic, but do not quote it while explaining its illegality. Then we have to find and delete your posts too.
by NERVUN » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:46 pm
New Korongo wrote:Why is the christian cross not banned?
by NERVUN » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:47 pm
Nobel Hobos wrote:New Korongo wrote:Why is the christian cross not banned?
It is.Katganistan wrote:Obscene and Explicit Content: Sexually graphic images and posts, and violent images such as bloody corpses. Very strictly forbidden. Obscene imagery and content in the forums should be reported to the Moderation Forum. Please provide a link to the topic, but do not quote it while explaining its illegality. Then we have to find and delete your posts too.
See? You can have a cross, but to make it christian you have to have a scantily clad bloke nailed to it. Too gory.
by New Korongo » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:47 pm
by Threlizdun » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:54 pm
by Mount Shavano » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:56 pm
by Nobel Hobos » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:57 pm
by Threlizdun » Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:57 pm
Mount Shavano wrote:The swastika isn't banned for anything to do with anyone being offended. It's banned because it is illegal in Germany, and the folks running NS don't want legal trouble or to lose that portion of the player base (no matter how small it is).[/thread]
by Syloria » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:03 pm
Banold wrote:After briefly reviewing etiquette policy and such I am a wee bit puzzled about policy here on NS, and I wanted your weigh ins.
Since offensive flags and the like are banned, specifically the swastika, why aren't communist flags banned as well?
Being a Tibetan Buddhist and having visited China, Nepal, Thailand, and the Philippines, I can sufficiently say that the swastika is a legitimate eastern religious symbol of rather inspiring proportions.
Also, I assume that the swastika is found offensive b/c of it's ties to the holocaust. Why aren't the flags of the USSR and PRC banned as well? The Soviet Union and the PRC both committed disgusting crimes against humanity on the scale that the Nazi regime perpetrated. You could deny this and believe that these states are/were worker's paradises but I don't deny the holocaust...
I'm sure this has been brought up before but I'm just pondering and curious to know what you all think out there
by Apoctis » Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:04 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Hidrandia, Keltionialang, Kowani, La Paz de Los Ricos, Maximum Imperium Rex, Plan Neonie, The Two Jerseys, Tiami, Yasuragi
Advertisement