bad company 3 when it should be BF3
Advertisement

by Imperial isa » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:51 am

by The Reliquary » Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:36 am

by Piacentini » Sat Oct 15, 2011 6:53 am

Yuyencia wrote:
「My friend please be respect are uneducate。 priest mans determine president are yuyencia people agreed tradition。Yuyencian people arelaugh your opinion defacate。 real fool who is are apparent,I am recommend reality check conversate starving street citizen」
- foreign minister mans are deliver vitriol message

by Indeos » Sat Oct 15, 2011 8:27 am
Wiztopia wrote:Indeos wrote:
How do you not understand that it doesn't matter whether or not it's actually important, so long as it's possibly important?
For example, if you told someone who is reading Dune that conditions on Arrakis weren't so different from those on Selusa Secundus, it would be a spoiler despite the fact that it doesn't actually reveal anything directly. The fact that it becomes a plot point later in the book (and I use the term "plot point" very loosely there, since it's really just something the protagonist notices) is completely irrelevant.
You're the one who said anything could possibly be a spoiler. Names, hair colors, eye colors, etc would be spoilers by your logic. Revealing something directly is an actual spoiler. Hinting at something is not.

by Wiztopia » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:27 am
Indeos wrote:Wiztopia wrote:
You're the one who said anything could possibly be a spoiler. Names, hair colors, eye colors, etc would be spoilers by your logic. Revealing something directly is an actual spoiler. Hinting at something is not.
I'm pretty sure that isn't even a response to what I said, since you're back to arguing with the dictionary definition.

by Indeos » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:31 am

by Thurask » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:56 am

by Indeos » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:57 am
Wiztopia wrote:Indeos wrote:
Again, you're back to arguing about the dictionary definition. Which means you should go bother Merriam-Webster, not me.
No you fail to understand it. "doesn't actually reveal anything directly" Hinting at something is not a spoiler. Saying there's nothing behind a door is not a spoiler.

by Syvorskji » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:00 am

by The East Coast Union » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:02 am

by Piacentini » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:03 am
Syvorskji wrote:I hate Battlelog for Battlefield 3! When I try to start the game with Origin it redirects me to battlelog, where I try to connect, and Origin says it starts Battlefield 3 Beta, but unfortinatly nothing happens!

Yuyencia wrote:
「My friend please be respect are uneducate。 priest mans determine president are yuyencia people agreed tradition。Yuyencian people arelaugh your opinion defacate。 real fool who is are apparent,I am recommend reality check conversate starving street citizen」
- foreign minister mans are deliver vitriol message

by Wiztopia » Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:23 pm
Indeos wrote:Wiztopia wrote:
No you fail to understand it. "doesn't actually reveal anything directly" Hinting at something is not a spoiler. Saying there's nothing behind a door is not a spoiler.
Saying there's nothing behind the door isn't hinting at something. Even if my example was wrong, it was a response to your Tatooine comment and wouldn't support your point anyway. This argument is quickly becoming farcical and circular; if you've got anything worthwhile to say feel free to send it in a TG. Otherwise, consider it over.

by The Reliquary » Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:51 pm
Syvorskji wrote:I hate Battlelog for Battlefield 3! When I try to start the game with Origin it redirects me to battlelog, where I try to connect, and Origin says it starts Battlefield 3 Beta, but unfortinatly nothing happens!

by Strykla » Sat Oct 15, 2011 2:56 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:05 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Norstal » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:23 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Mass Effect 3 will have multiplayer.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:26 pm

Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Imperial isa » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:28 pm

by Indeos » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:42 pm

by Thurask » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:48 pm

by Norstal » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:54 pm

Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Indeos » Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:59 pm
Norstal wrote:Indeos wrote:
Why the hell would they need better graphics? Mass Effect's graphics were fine.
IMO, the multiplayer is coming 2 games too late.
The textures are not as good as other games. This is apparent when you look at Garrus' armor.
Now, granted, there are hi-textures mods, but really, there are apparent flaws:

by Norstal » Sat Oct 15, 2011 8:01 pm
Indeos wrote:I seriously don't see a game-breaking difference. Ffs the graphics are way better than is necessary for a fun game, and the more time/money they spend on graphics the worse everything else gets.
In short: Graphics are one of the most overprioritized parts of a game, and it's only like that because they make the game sell better. And because of people like you, who complain that great graphics are bad simply because they aren't the best in relation to every other game (which is even worse than it should be due to the tendency to compare games that are a few years old to ones that are a few months old).
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Mosasauria » Sat Oct 15, 2011 8:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Archinstinct, El Lazaro, Fahran, Galloism, Google [Bot], Ors Might, Port Caverton, Rusozak, Shrillland, Vistulange, Vylumiti, Washington Resistance Army, Xmara
Advertisement