If the USA had to lose a state...

by **Wamitoria** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:40 am

Vandengaarde wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Hell no. Besides, you wouldn't want the southern part of my state to join.

California?

Indiana.

by **Vandengaarde** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:41 am

Wamitoria wrote:
Vandengaarde wrote:California?

Indiana.

I've never heard anything bad about southern Indiana.

by **Wamitoria** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:42 am

Vandengaarde wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:Indiana.

I've never heard anything bad about southern Indiana.

Northern Indiana = Illinois with slightly less corruption

Southern Indiana = Alabama with snow

by **Arborlawn** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:42 am

Hawaii

by **Vandengaarde** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:44 am

Wamitoria wrote:
Vandengaarde wrote:I've never heard anything bad about southern Indiana.

Northern Indiana = Illinois with slightly less corruption

Southern Indiana = Alabama with snow

Oh. I will do a little system of equations for my state too!
Northern Minnesota= Siberia, except a bit less cold and more farms.
Southeastern Minnesota= Typical economic area; kind of like...Stockholm I guess?
Southwest Minnesota= Boring area with nothing; sort of like South Dakota.

by **Nazi Flower Power** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:45 am

St George of England wrote:
Vandengaarde wrote:Noo!
We can't lose a star on the flag! It'll look even dumber, and I hate odd numbers!

Well....

give the 13 Colonies back to their rightful owners (tbh, they would probably prefer to be with Britain than with Wyoming or Texas), and it'll be even.

No, the 13 colonies do not all get along. If you break the Union, New England and the Southern colonies will want to be separated. In particular, South Carolina will give you all kinds of crap. You might talk New England into coming back, but you aren't getting South Carolina.

by **Suburbian Sewer** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:48 am

They have a state called New Mexico. Like we need another one of those! :lol2:

by **Vandengaarde** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:57 am

Nazi Flower Power wrote:
St George of England wrote:Well....

give the 13 Colonies back to their rightful owners (tbh, they would probably prefer to be with Britain than with Wyoming or Texas), and it'll be even.

No, the 13 colonies do not all get along. If you break the Union, New England and the Southern colonies will want to be separated. In particular, South Carolina will give you all kinds of crap. You might talk New England into coming back, but you aren't getting South Carolina.

South Carolina would probably secede back in to the U.S.
Like...a reverse Civil War.

by **Arkinesia** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:33 am

Innsmothe wrote:Texas, Alabama or Georgia.

No, you picked all the wrong Southern states.

Except for Texas, they can go.

Mississippi. Even if there's a lot of cute girls there, they are the most obese and most ass-backwards state in the Union.

by **Carpathosylvania** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:40 am

Texas...They think it is their own country...And recent Texan presidents have jumped the gun---getting the United States into foreign wars (Lyndon Johnson and the Bushes).

by **Treka** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:40 am

The whole northeast can go to Canada , (so i'll be Canadian )

by **Virathia** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:42 am

Rhode Island.

by **Tavalu** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:11 pm

Treka wrote:The whole northeast can go to Canada , (so i'll be Canadian )

Ew who wants to be Canadian...they buy milk in bags! Can you imagine the pain that must be.

No im just kidding, I wouldn't mind being Canadians, I like Canadians, they are pleasant to be around, I have many Canadian friends.

by **Sociobiology** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:58 pm

Treka wrote:The whole northeast can go to Canada , (so i'll be Canadian )

if the entire northeast became Canadian the rest of the country would go bankrupt and implode.
almost all of the states with a positive income are in the northeast.

by **Mike the Progressive** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:43 pm

St George of England wrote:
Vandengaarde wrote:Noo!
We can't lose a star on the flag! It'll look even dumber, and I hate odd numbers!

Well....

give the 13 Colonies back to their rightful owners (tbh, they would probably prefer to be with Britain than with Wyoming or Texas), and it'll be even.

To GB? You shitting me right now? You guys can barely handle the Falkand Islands, and now you want to take control of the East coast, of 100 million people? What's next, going to invade India and retake control of parts of China?

by **The New Gaula Reich** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 5:55 pm

Maine. Make it boring Canada, and add Puerto Rico to make fifty states.

by **Tecknoko** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:24 pm

-Bederich- wrote:
Tecknoko wrote:Anything from the North really.

The North West or North East, because the North East was where the country started, loosing it would mean loosing ourselves.

And losing the idiots that say pop and pronounce everything wrong. So it evens out.

by **Brandenburg-Altmark** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:26 pm

The New Gaula Reich wrote:Maine. Make it boring Canada, and add Puerto Rico to make fifty states.

That'd be very nice, we identify more with our Canadian neighbors than some of you lunatics to the south!(looking at you, every state south or west of Massachusetts. Also, Massachusetts.)

by **Israeon** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:33 pm

One... hmm... it would have to be...
South Dakota. In fact, why not just have them together to from Dakota?

by **New Lusitaniagrad** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:38 pm

Jersey.

by **Mike the Progressive** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:39 pm

New Lusitaniagrad wrote:Jersey.

^This. Seriously, Fuck New Jersey, does it even have anything? It's like the dump site for the country anyway.

by **SaintB** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:41 pm

Texas, the people there act like they don't want to be part of the country anyway.

by **Occupied Deutschland** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:29 pm

SaintB wrote:Texas, the people there act like they don't want to be part of the country anyway.

No, those crazy fucks down there need a more responsible person to look after them.
Now Jersey, that wouldn't be a loss.

by **SaintB** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:43 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
SaintB wrote:Texas, the people there act like they don't want to be part of the country anyway.

No, those crazy fucks down there need a more responsible person to look after them.
Now Jersey, that wouldn't be a loss.

Sure it would, where would New York dump its garbage?

by **Ravea** » Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:50 pm

New Jersey. That place is terrible.

If the USA had to lose a state...

Who is online