Bestiality.

[Gagatron]

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

[Azaca]

No, but for me I follow what the Quran says.

Good for you. Now, do you wish to force everyone else to follow the book also?

No, That goes against what the Qursn says.

[Old Vester]

Animals have no rights and are nothing more than resources. They should be exploited to the best of our abilities, however their general welfare should be taken into account.

While I personally disapprove of bestiality, I think people should have the right to do what they want. If we can slaughter these animals and eat them, I don't really care if someone want to fuck them.

Or alternatively, Fuck Animals (figuratively, literally if that's what you're into).

Would you want to eat a steak from a cow that someone f***ed?

[Gagatron]

That's not everything. Your paraphrase is insufficient.

And you said that the animal doesn't like it (source?), which is absurd because we do shittons of things to animals that they don't like. I haven't seen any other parts to your posts except for theocratic mumbo-jumbo totally irrelevant to this thread.

When did I even mention religion in my argument? My argument was from a secular point of view.

[The Parkus Empire]

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

Irrelevant.

[Norstal]

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

And so is ADD. Your point?

[Galloism]

Animals have no rights and are nothing more than resources. They should be exploited to the best of our abilities, however their general welfare should be taken into account.

While I personally disapprove of bestiality, I think people should have the right to do what they want. If we can slaughter these animals and eat them, I don't really care if someone want to fuck them.

Or alternatively, Fuck Animals (figuratively, literally if that's what you're into).

Would you want to eat a steak from a cow that someone f***ed?

Does the meat of virgin cows taste better?

[Gagatron]

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

Irrelevant.

How is it irrelevant? If it's not conductive to sanity, it shouldn't be allowed.

[New Ziedrich]

Animals are gross; ergo, bestiality is gross. QED.

[Esternial]

Or bump into Gallo screwing the neighbour's dog?

Just an example.

Bitch was asking for it.

I really doubt that.

[Unhealthy2]

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

To be fair, so is pretty much everything else these days. Oh, you eat more food than you have to in order to survive, that's an eating disorder. Oh, you tend to be a high strung person, you must have anxiety disorder. I mean, at what point does "disorder" stop and "acceptable variation in the tapestry of humanity" begin?

[The Parkus Empire]

And you said that the animal doesn't like it (source?), which is absurd because we do shittons of things to animals that they don't like. I haven't seen any other parts to your posts except for theocratic mumbo-jumbo totally irrelevant to this thread.

When did I even mention religion in my argument? My argument was from a secular point of view.

Your argument considered birth control as pointless and unproductive along with bestiality. No sane person would consider birth control unproductive unless he was making an argument from religion.

[Norstal]

Irrelevant.

How is it irrelevant? If it's not conductive to sanity, it shouldn't be allowed.

And so is ADD or eating disorders. Your point?

[Gagatron]

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

To be fair, so is pretty much everything else these days. Oh, you eat more food than you have to in order to survive, that's an eating disorder. Oh, you tend to be a high strung person, you must have anxiety disorder. I mean, at what point does "disorder" stop and "acceptable variation in the tapestry of humanity" begin?

Thank you for the legitimate argument.

[Gagatron]

When did I even mention religion in my argument? My argument was from a secular point of view.

Your argument considered birth control as pointless and unproductive along with bestiality. No sane person would consider birth control unproductive unless he was making an argument from religion.

So, I've been reading about ad hominems recently...

[Norstal]

Animals are gross; ergo, bestiality is gross. QED.

Well we already established that a few pages ago.

[The Parkus Empire]

Irrelevant.

How is it irrelevant? If it's not conductive to sanity, it shouldn't be allowed.

I don't see why that follows. Smoking isn't conducive to physical health, but that's legal.

[Takaram]

Animals have no rights and are nothing more than resources. They should be exploited to the best of our abilities, however their general welfare should be taken into account.

While I personally disapprove of bestiality, I think people should have the right to do what they want. If we can slaughter these animals and eat them, I don't really care if someone want to fuck them.

Or alternatively, Fuck Animals (figuratively, literally if that's what you're into).

Would you want to eat a steak from a cow that someone f***ed?

Personally, I don't want to eat any of those parts anyway.

[Gagatron]

How is it irrelevant? If it's not conductive to sanity, it shouldn't be allowed.

I don't see why that follows. Smoking isn't conducive to physical health, but that's legal.

IMO, smoking shouldn't be legal. But it is. Whatever. Irrelevant.

[Old Vester]

Would you want to eat a steak from a cow that someone f***ed?

Does the meat of virgin cows taste better?

Think about it. Guy screws a cow. Guy climaxes. Guy walks away. Cow is then killed and made into steak. You then eat said stake. Basically, what I'm saying is that some guy stook his penis into the cow which then became your steak. Your steak has touched a penis.

Zoophilia is techinically a mental disorder.

To be fair, so is pretty much everything else these days. Oh, you eat more food than you have to in order to survive, that's an eating disorder. Oh, you tend to be a high strung person, you must have anxiety disorder. I mean, at what point does "disorder" stop and "acceptable variation in the tapestry of humanity" begin?

When it's non-destructive.

[Norstal]

Would you want to eat a steak from a cow that someone f***ed?

Personally, I don't want to eat any of those parts anyway.

Heh, I don't even think they serve a cow's ass or vagina.

They do serve cow's tongue.

[The Travuersan Union]

You are in situation 4,775,166,842,102: a dog somehow "rapes" you. Hypothetically, you want it*. Do you go to jail for bestiality? Obviously the dog can't give consent, as the people in this thread have said.

In other words, are you in the wrong if he starts it?

*Yes, I know that's not rape, but the point is that you never forced, or even coxed the dog to do terrible things to you.

[The Parkus Empire]

Your argument considered birth control as pointless and unproductive along with bestiality. No sane person would consider birth control unproductive unless he was making an argument from religion.

So, I've been reading about ad hominems recently...

I'm attacking your argument, which even applied exclusively to bestiality is that: "Sex that doesn't aim to create children is pointless." That's a religious argument if I ever saw one.

[Lackadaisical2]

Irrelevant.

How is it irrelevant? If it's not conductive to sanity, it shouldn't be allowed.

I don't think the legality of the act changes whether or not someone has a sexual orientation. But beyond that, we allow people to do plenty of things which may be harmful to themselves.

[Gagatron]

So, I've been reading about ad hominems recently...

I'm attacking your argument, which even applied exclusively to bestiality is that: "Sex that doesn't aim to create children is pointless." That's a religious argument if I ever saw one.

Unfortunately, that's not what I said, and it's not an argument from religion anyway. I said, "Making babies is ONE OF the points of sex".

Reading comprehension, folks.