NATION

PASSWORD

Bestiality.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Well?

Legalize it.
55
30%
Nah, fuck no. Fuck the fuck off!
110
60%
Legalize it, but only under specific conditions (please explain).
17
9%
 
Total votes : 182

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:17 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:Although I will point out that no one answered how an animal can legally give consent.


They can't. And it's very weird you bring such an issue to bear because animals cannot nor do we ask them for consent when we do the things we do to them.

The issue of consent is a human one and irrelevant to this thread.

:clap: :kiss: :bow:
Thanks Nana for reminding him of what everyone else has been trying to point out. Maybe he and the others will finally get it.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
The Deep Vault
Envoy
 
Posts: 228
Founded: Dec 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deep Vault » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:18 pm

The Murtunian Tribes wrote:Although I will point out that no one answered how an animal can legally give consent.


Whether or not they can legally give consent currently is irrelevant when those exact laws are what we're debating the validity of.
Heliopolis Puppet #2
Tetraca wrote:Lol, I was putting the cat out and my uncle told me to "play with my pussy somewhere else" XD
Married to Nanatsu by Beta-Centaurian Law.
Not actually sure what tech level is...has PT levels of tech, but entire population consists of mutants with abilities beyond the human norm...

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:20 pm

The Deep Vault wrote:
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:Although I will point out that no one answered how an animal can legally give consent.


Whether or not they can legally give consent currently is irrelevant when those exact laws are what we're debating the validity of.

Take a look at Nana's post.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Brandenburg-Altmark
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5813
Founded: Nov 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brandenburg-Altmark » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:20 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:Although I will point out that no one answered how an animal can legally give consent.


They can't. And it's very weird you bring such an issue to bear because animals cannot nor do we ask them for consent when we do the things we do to them.

The issue of consent is a human one and irrelevant to this thread.


I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.21
TOKYONI UNJUSTLY DELETED 19/06/2011 - SAY NO TO MOD IMPERIALISM
Tanker til Norge.
Free isam wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Where's inda? Or Russa for that matter?

idot inda is asias gron and russa is its hat ok :palm:

User avatar
Old Vester
Senator
 
Posts: 3831
Founded: Sep 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Old Vester » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:21 pm

Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
They can't. And it's very weird you bring such an issue to bear because animals cannot nor do we ask them for consent when we do the things we do to them.

The issue of consent is a human one and irrelevant to this thread.


I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?
"A man chooses, a slave obeys".-Andrew Ryan
"Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity".-George Carlin.
"I want you to kill yourself. I will buy and send you rope". -EmpireErwinRommel
Billy Mays of F7. Current balance in F7CF $104,952.I'm the richest one!!
Mushet wrote:Banned becuse you need to stop being a politically correct nigger lover
Coccygia wrote:Is the unsung original creator of Angry Birds.
The only question I can answer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-Pxifl3zjg&NR=1. Name in Cat translated by 1000 Cats: Zeˑhsˑr:kxk (kxk = "old") (lit. "the first sanctuary, old and glad")
Need a dedicated co-OP? I'll do it for drugs free!-I can also consult for creative ideas and such.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm

Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
They can't. And it's very weird you bring such an issue to bear because animals cannot nor do we ask them for consent when we do the things we do to them.

The issue of consent is a human one and irrelevant to this thread.


I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

Except we don't butcher or milk children. Nor do we keep them as pets, but rather as...children.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72255
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm

Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
They can't. And it's very weird you bring such an issue to bear because animals cannot nor do we ask them for consent when we do the things we do to them.

The issue of consent is a human one and irrelevant to this thread.


I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

I read "gay parrots" the first time through.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
The Deep Vault
Envoy
 
Posts: 228
Founded: Dec 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deep Vault » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm

Mosasauria wrote:
The Deep Vault wrote:
Whether or not they can legally give consent currently is irrelevant when those exact laws are what we're debating the validity of.

Take a look at Nana's post.



I actually disagree with the idea that consent shouldn't be considered, but...that's for another debate.

Not one I'd mind having, mind you.
Heliopolis Puppet #2
Tetraca wrote:Lol, I was putting the cat out and my uncle told me to "play with my pussy somewhere else" XD
Married to Nanatsu by Beta-Centaurian Law.
Not actually sure what tech level is...has PT levels of tech, but entire population consists of mutants with abilities beyond the human norm...

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm

Old Vester wrote:
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?

I think he means that their consent could begin to matter if they are in fact capable of doing so.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm

Old Vester wrote:
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?

That seems to be what he is pointing out.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Brandenburg-Altmark
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5813
Founded: Nov 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brandenburg-Altmark » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:24 pm

Old Vester wrote:
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?


No, I'm saying if it can be proven that they can express their own desires in a manner understandable by humans, they should have similar rights to humans.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.21
TOKYONI UNJUSTLY DELETED 19/06/2011 - SAY NO TO MOD IMPERIALISM
Tanker til Norge.
Free isam wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Where's inda? Or Russa for that matter?

idot inda is asias gron and russa is its hat ok :palm:

User avatar
Vectrova
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1522
Founded: Mar 11, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Vectrova » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:24 pm

Old Vester wrote:
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?


Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.
This is a signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
I hardy ever notice if someone else isn't being serious. By the same token, expect me to be serious.
If you want to know anything specific about me, send a TG and I'll respond when I can.
My nation is a caricature of what it should be. Do not take it terribly seriously.
I'm subject to disappear for periods of time with little to no explanation. This does not mean I conceded the argument; odds are that I just found something better to do.

Lackadaisical2 wrote::bow:
Clever bastard.

Collectively Awesome wrote:I'd install Vectrova as a political advisor.

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:He explained it better than I can.

User avatar
The Deep Vault
Envoy
 
Posts: 228
Founded: Dec 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deep Vault » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:24 pm

Norstal wrote:
Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.

Except we don't butcher or milk children. Nor do we keep them as pets, but rather as...children.


There's a difference in scale factor there, however. Also, owning them as pets isn't always something animals mind.
Heliopolis Puppet #2
Tetraca wrote:Lol, I was putting the cat out and my uncle told me to "play with my pussy somewhere else" XD
Married to Nanatsu by Beta-Centaurian Law.
Not actually sure what tech level is...has PT levels of tech, but entire population consists of mutants with abilities beyond the human norm...

User avatar
Phing Phong
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1748
Founded: Sep 04, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Phing Phong » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:25 pm

For me as a person who attempts to treat animals with the appropriate respect I feel they deserve as feeling beings, by refraining from their consumption whenever possible, I do not think that human beings should exert their sexual will over an animal which does not have the mental maturity or development to give consent.
Incompetent Buddhist, liberal centrist and militant queer

Embassy Program | NSwiki Pages | Factbook | Map | National Anthem | Constitution | Phing Phong Fine Rices | Culture Test
Member of the Stonewall Alliance, open to all LGBT-friendly nations!

User avatar
Brandenburg-Altmark
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5813
Founded: Nov 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brandenburg-Altmark » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:26 pm

Vectrova wrote:
Old Vester wrote:So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?


Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.


Remember that there are millions of species of "animal," and that not all have the same level of cognitive awareness. If we can prove an animal is self-aware and capable of expressing thoughts, that animal should be protected from use by humans. That's a pretty big if, because as you've said we can't yet tell if animals understand the decisions they make. It's a very similar issue to the rights of children, and just as difficult to make big decisions on.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.21
TOKYONI UNJUSTLY DELETED 19/06/2011 - SAY NO TO MOD IMPERIALISM
Tanker til Norge.
Free isam wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Where's inda? Or Russa for that matter?

idot inda is asias gron and russa is its hat ok :palm:

User avatar
The Deep Vault
Envoy
 
Posts: 228
Founded: Dec 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deep Vault » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:27 pm

Vectrova wrote:
Old Vester wrote:So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?


Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.


No, it's not. Killing to protect yourself from starvation is different from committing rape for a thrill.
Heliopolis Puppet #2
Tetraca wrote:Lol, I was putting the cat out and my uncle told me to "play with my pussy somewhere else" XD
Married to Nanatsu by Beta-Centaurian Law.
Not actually sure what tech level is...has PT levels of tech, but entire population consists of mutants with abilities beyond the human norm...

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72255
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:30 pm

The Deep Vault wrote:
Vectrova wrote:
Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.


No, it's not. Killing to protect yourself from starvation is different from committing rape for a thrill.

How many people you think would die if they quit eating meat?

A few, those with difficulty in breaking down protein particularly, but the vast majority would not.
Last edited by Galloism on Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:30 pm

The Deep Vault wrote:
Vectrova wrote:
Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.


No, it's not. Killing to protect yourself from starvation is different from committing rape for a thrill.


But thrills are what people live for.

User avatar
Vectrova
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1522
Founded: Mar 11, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Vectrova » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:30 pm

The Deep Vault wrote:
Vectrova wrote:
Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.


No, it's not. Killing to protect yourself from starvation is different from committing rape for a thrill.


We don't need to eat animals to survive. We do, but it isn't necessary.

Moreover, rape implies consent was not given. Fascinating how you're throwing that word around without bullet-proof definitions of consent that work for animals and a reason why consent matters in terms of sex but not in terms of food without sounding hypocritical.
This is a signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
I hardy ever notice if someone else isn't being serious. By the same token, expect me to be serious.
If you want to know anything specific about me, send a TG and I'll respond when I can.
My nation is a caricature of what it should be. Do not take it terribly seriously.
I'm subject to disappear for periods of time with little to no explanation. This does not mean I conceded the argument; odds are that I just found something better to do.

Lackadaisical2 wrote::bow:
Clever bastard.

Collectively Awesome wrote:I'd install Vectrova as a political advisor.

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:He explained it better than I can.

User avatar
The Deep Vault
Envoy
 
Posts: 228
Founded: Dec 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Deep Vault » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:31 pm

Phing Phong wrote:For me as a person who attempts to treat animals with the appropriate respect I feel they deserve as feeling beings, by refraining from their consumption whenever possible, I do not think that human beings should exert their sexual will over an animal which does not have the mental maturity or development to give consent.


Prove to me they're developmentally unable to consent. Bearing in mind we have no clue about how brain structure works for non-mammals (and even for mammals).
Heliopolis Puppet #2
Tetraca wrote:Lol, I was putting the cat out and my uncle told me to "play with my pussy somewhere else" XD
Married to Nanatsu by Beta-Centaurian Law.
Not actually sure what tech level is...has PT levels of tech, but entire population consists of mutants with abilities beyond the human norm...

User avatar
Brandenburg-Altmark
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5813
Founded: Nov 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Brandenburg-Altmark » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:32 pm

Galloism wrote:
The Deep Vault wrote:
No, it's not. Killing to protect yourself from starvation is different from committing rape for a thrill.

How many people you think would die if they quit eating meat.

A few, those with difficulty in breaking down protein particularly, but the vast majority would not.


That doesn't mean that Humanity as a whole will not have certain nutritional deficiencies and such, since not everything can be replaced in plant form, and not everyone is capable of eating certain plants that may be required to fill a nutritional niche.
Economic Left/Right: -7.50 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.21
TOKYONI UNJUSTLY DELETED 19/06/2011 - SAY NO TO MOD IMPERIALISM
Tanker til Norge.
Free isam wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Where's inda? Or Russa for that matter?

idot inda is asias gron and russa is its hat ok :palm:

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:32 pm

Vectrova wrote:
Old Vester wrote:So if it's smart we should be allowed to have sex with it?


Not to mention Gorillas and other sapient species only learn languages when we teach such things to them, we can't tell if they understand the gravity of their decisions, etc.

It's stupid and hypocritical to say that the "consent" of the same animals we cut up and digest every day somehow matter only in the context of screwing them sexually.

Exactly!
Under New Management since 8/9/12

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202543
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:32 pm

Brandenburg-Altmark wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
They can't. And it's very weird you bring such an issue to bear because animals cannot nor do we ask them for consent when we do the things we do to them.

The issue of consent is a human one and irrelevant to this thread.


I would say it is not necessarily a human issue. In my opinion, it is viewed as a human issue because we traditionally believe only humans are capable of two way communication. What of a Gorilla taught to use sign language to express his or herself? Or gray parrots with cognitive capabilities measured to be on par with a human child? Self awareness and capacity for communication I think ought to be the qualifiers for consent to apply.


Communication does not always signify sapience, although it is a significant factor. The short answer is that these animals, while intelligent for animals, are still owned by and property of people. They can no more give or revoke consent than a fleshlight. The fact that they possess sentience and can view the world does not automatically imply that they can give or revoke consent or that consent even applies.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Gagatron
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1979
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Gagatron » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:32 pm

Perhaps there's more to sexual intercourse than just pleasure. It is a social action. It is for a bond between a couple, and to form a productive society. Sex in the animal world means something different than in the human world. For animals it is an expression of social status, whereas for human beings it is an expression of affection. Ultimately sex between a human and an animal is unproductive. No baby can be made, no mutual love is expressed, and no mutual pleasure is gained. It serves no social benefit because it is simply treatment of an animal as an object. It is potentially very unhealthy, and is most definitely very unproductive.

Is it wrong? Yes. Should it be illegal? That is up to the majority.
Last edited by Gagatron on Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
God, I want to dream again,
Take me where I've never been.
I wanna go there,
This time I'm not scared.
Music, love, peace, joy, history, religion, foreign cultures, foreign language, philosophy, debating, etc.


Zilam wrote:It always strikes me funny when people always complain "If God is good, why does he allow evil to exist"....Yet when God destroys every evil person in a flood, its a bad thing.

All sin is deserving of death.

User avatar
Mosasauria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11074
Founded: Nov 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mosasauria » Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:33 pm

Phing Phong wrote:For me as a person who attempts to treat animals with the appropriate respect I feel they deserve as feeling beings, by refraining from their consumption whenever possible, I do not think that human beings should exert their sexual will over an animal which does not have the mental maturity or development to give consent.

The animal won't even know its being fucked. To them, it will feel like another attack.
Under New Management since 8/9/12

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Andsed, Celritannia, Dogmeat, New Chon, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Northern Steakia, Point Blob, Rary, Raynolds, Rhodevus, Rusticus I Damianus, The Astral Mandate, The Huskar Social Union, Uminaku

Advertisement

Remove ads