Let Pitt the Younger square off against Gladstone etc. I've only got 10 options but tried to be fair, I'm sure I've missed all the best ones off the poll which you can complain about at length.
So history buffs, have at it.

by Forsakia » Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:31 pm

by The Archregimancy » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:13 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:
Sorry, but I find Disraeli to be a triumph of style over substance, a man willing to discard almost any political principle if it took him closer to the top of the proverbial greasy pole. His entire career is a triumph of expediency over principle, and in that sense he almost singlehandedly invented modern British politics. I don't mean that as a compliment.
Gladstone was undoubtedly a moralist, and often a tiresome one, but on most of the substantive issues of his day, he was right, though not always successful. He was right on electoral reform, he was right on social reform, he was usually right on economic policy, and he was certainly right on Ireland. Modern Britain would be inconceivable without him, and I do mean that as a compliment. Catherine Gladstone probably summed it up best when she said to her husband, "Oh William, if you weren't such a great man you'd be a terrible bore".
I suppose it ultimately depends on whether you prefer your Victorian politicians as substance-free mercurial geniuses or substance-stuffed moralising geniuses.
Forsakia wrote:(And including all First Lords of the Treasury before some smart arse makes a clever point about CB being the first ever official Prime Minister).

by The Archregimancy » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:23 pm
Forsakia wrote:(And includingall First Lords of the Treasuryanyone The Archregimancy thinks should countbefore some smart arse makes a clever point about CB being the first ever official Prime Minister).

by North Suran » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:30 pm
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Sedgistan » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:37 pm

by North Suran » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:41 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Earl Grey - spent years on the opposition benches due to his support for parliamentary reform, and finally got his chance to be PM in 1830. Passed the Great Reform Act (1832), setting the UK on the (slow) path towards democracy, and abolished slavery in the Empire, before retiring in 1834. What more could you want?
(And, I suppose, the tea...)
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by The Archregimancy » Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:56 am
Georgism wrote:Probably Gladstone.
Sedgistan wrote:Earl Grey - spent years on the opposition benches due to his support for parliamentary reform, and finally got his chance to be PM in 1830. Passed the Great Reform Act (1832), setting the UK on the (slow) path towards democracy, and abolished slavery in the Empire, before retiring in 1834. What more could you want?

by Forsakia » Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:56 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Georgism wrote:Probably Gladstone.
Huzzah!
But why all the poll love for the Duke of Wellington? I don't doubt his abilities as a general (and I used to live on the battlefield of the Battle of Waterloo), but he was a fairly dismal politician whose achievement in passing Catholic Emancipation (largely because he had no choice after O'Connell's election) in his brief two year term as Prime Minister was overwhelmed by his opposition to any form of electoral reform. He was so unpopular by the end of his short term that he had iron shutters placed over the windows of his London residence to stop passers-by from smashing the windows; this, rather than any reference to a strong personality, was what earned him the nickname 'the iron duke'.
He continued his staunch opposition to electoral reform as leader of the opposition. Reform would pass the Commons only to be shot down by Wellington's Tories in the Lords. When he was forced to back down by William IV's threat to create enough Whig peers to get reform through the Lords, Wellington's huffy reaction to the first sitting of the Commons after the Great Reform Act was "I never saw so many shocking bad hats in my life."Sedgistan wrote:Earl Grey - spent years on the opposition benches due to his support for parliamentary reform, and finally got his chance to be PM in 1830. Passed the Great Reform Act (1832), setting the UK on the (slow) path towards democracy, and abolished slavery in the Empire, before retiring in 1834. What more could you want?
Shagging Georgina Cavendish, the Duchess of Devonshire? And fathering an illegitimate child by her? Causing such a scandal that the Duke almost divorced the Duchess? And using the social connections arising from that relationship to ingratiate himself with the Whig leadership, leading to his rise to political prominence?
Earl Grey was a man of many undoubted talents, but one suspects that he was a bit of a cad.

by Alf Landon » Thu May 10, 2012 8:41 pm
). And Pitt the Elder really set a new standard of competence, and was a great break in the tradition of Prime Ministers being 9 to 5 men (yeah, they could do a competent job, but being a great leader wasn't the objective of their lives): Pitt really threw everything into being a master of his post, and no doubt he laid the foundations for Britain to be the premier world power to boot.
by Ifreann » Fri May 11, 2012 6:29 am

by Aethelstania » Fri May 11, 2012 6:32 am
Divair wrote:Who was the most liberal of them?

by Forsakia » Fri May 11, 2012 6:38 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andevania, Belgania, Best Mexico, Bombadil, Bovad, Celritannia, Dreria, Ethel mermania, Pizza Friday Forever91, South Miruva, The Black Forrest
Advertisement