It's a Choice.....Oh Really?

by **UCDF** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:18 pm

Geniasis wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Because apparently when Yahweh was inspiring people to write that part of the Bible...he was umm sexually frustrated....

I'm going to Hell, I know.

To be fair, when the glory of your visage is enough to obliterate all who stand before you, then it's kinda hard.

Plus, wouldn't it sort of be incest considering he created everyone?

You ruin the Bible.

by **Wilgrove** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:19 pm

Puppies Are Cute wrote:I know that you are either born as a Homo or Hetero (sexual). It doesn't matter who you like and who you date. It only matters that we are all tolerant of each other.

Agreed, and I also agree with your nation's name. Puppies are cute.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:19 pm

Geniasis wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Because apparently when Yahweh was inspiring people to write that part of the Bible...he was umm sexually frustrated....

I'm going to Hell, I know.

To be fair, when the glory of your visage is enough to obliterate all who stand before you, then it's kinda hard.

Plus, wouldn't it sort of be incest considering he created everyone?

And we never stop gossiping about him. I mean, one little fling with a nice Jewish girl, and we're still talking about it 2000 years later!

by **GeneralHaNor** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:19 pm

Fionnuala_Saoirse wrote:
Wilgrove wrote: I mean if it's a choice, then you should have no problem with the simple act of making out with someone of your own gender.

I'm really not sure that follows

It doesn't because it fails to account for preference

I could make out with a guy, but I won't, because I don't find men attractive
That's my preference

by **Wilgrove** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:20 pm

UCDF wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
To be fair, when the glory of your visage is enough to obliterate all who stand before you, then it's kinda hard.

Plus, wouldn't it sort of be incest considering he created everyone?

You ruin the Bible.

No, I think the people who picked a choose what went INTO the Bible, about several centuries after the rise into Heaven of Christ, is what ruined The Bible.

by **Geniasis** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:20 pm

Norstal wrote:Hey, at least you guys have a sports team. The guys in Nirvana doesn't do anything except getting high.

Yeah, I spent a week there visiting a friend of mine. I've had enough Wizard of Oz and Pink Floyd to last an afterlife.

by **Zeth Rekia** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:20 pm

Norstal wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
Man, I'm going to hate it when the annual Heaven/Valhalla Rugby game happens. I have such a shit team.

"Goddamit, Abraham. Stop reading the Talmud and play some defense!"

"Ah-HEM"

"Oh, sorry God... dammit Thor just scored again!"

Hey, at least you guys have a sports team. The guys in Nirvana doesn't do anything except getting high.

Don't forget the guy that ssmoked himself. I can't remember his name. All I know is he sploded his own face and apparently couldn't put it back together afterwards.

Who's dat.... Some guy called Mat Kubric? :unsure:

by **Norstal** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:20 pm

UCDF wrote:
Helertia wrote:
It never says anything about killing homosexuals. It just says they're ritually unclean.

Thank you!

You better kill all the homos nonetheless, lest they change the color of ye drapes to purple.

by **Helertia** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:21 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Helertia wrote:
It never says anything about killing homosexuals. It just says they're ritually unclean.

Really? Some versions are really off then... One said that they must be killed.

Figures.
Well, it depends on how you interpret it - Hebrew laws have different levels on uncleanliness. Periods, for example, required isolation and a cleansing rital, as did masturbation (or just missing the vagina). On the other hand, working on the Sabbath also made one ritually unclean - And there are examples of people being stoned for that offence.
Due to the placement of that particular phrase, the most informed and academic interpretations peg it at the same level as periods and masturbation (it was more or less the same offence as masturbation - 'spilling the seed') but others prefer to interpret it more harshly, which caught on.

Of course, Leviticus is an utterly obsolete, ignored book.

by **GeneralHaNor** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:22 pm

Wilgrove wrote:
Central Slavia wrote:It is a problem of the sexual instinct, similar to zoophillia , necrophillia, to lesser extent fetishism, voyeurism, froteurism or exhibitionism

Only problem with that, is that homosexuality was declared NOT a mental illness in the 70s, so the DSM-IV and beyond, does not list Homosexuality as a mental illness. Try again.

Psychology is the new religion

If it has a Dr. in it's name, it can't be questioned

by **UCDF** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:22 pm

Wilgrove wrote:
UCDF wrote:You ruin the Bible.

No, I think the people who picked a choose what went INTO the Bible, about several centuries after the rise into Heaven of Christ, is what ruined The Bible.

I was just saying, He has to have a sexual view on how god created people.

by **Wilgrove** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:24 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Only problem with that, is that homosexuality was declared NOT a mental illness in the 70s, so the DSM-IV and beyond, does not list Homosexuality as a mental illness. Try again.

Psychology is the new religion

If it has a Dr. in it's name, it can't be questioned

It can be questioned by someone who has an actual understanding of psychology. Your average joe does not. I know when you were little, and your teacher says "There's no such thing as a stupid question", well your teacher was wrong. There are such things as stupid questions.

by **GeneralHaNor** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:25 pm

Mosasauria wrote:Is getting beat up, discriminated against, rejected by lovers and parents, ostracized from society, and being considered a freak a choice?
I think not.

If they rejected you, they weren't lovers

by **The Corparation** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:25 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Only problem with that, is that homosexuality was declared NOT a mental illness in the 70s, so the DSM-IV and beyond, does not list Homosexuality as a mental illness. Try again.

Psychology is the new religion

If it has a Dr. in it's name, it can't be questioned

No. No its not. Its people like you who think psychology is bullshit that contribute to lack of care for the mentally deranged. Which leads to things like the Arizona Massacre.

by **Geniasis** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:26 pm

UCDF wrote:I was just saying, He has to have a sexual view on how god created people.

I do?

Please, do keep telling me what views I "have to have".

by **Copenhagen Metropolis** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:26 pm

Does it matter whether it's a choice or not? I don't think it does.

by **Dakini** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:26 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Only problem with that, is that homosexuality was declared NOT a mental illness in the 70s, so the DSM-IV and beyond, does not list Homosexuality as a mental illness. Try again.

Psychology is the new religion

If it has a Dr. in it's name, it can't be questioned

Science fail.

by **UCDF** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:27 pm

Geniasis wrote:
UCDF wrote:I was just saying, He has to have a sexual view on how god created people.

I do?

Please, do keep telling me what views I "have to have".

"Plus, wouldn't it sort of be incest considering he created everyone?"

That.

by **UCUMAY** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:27 pm

Copenhagen Metropolis wrote:Does it matter whether it's a choice or not? I don't think it does.

Did you choose to like men or women?

by **Wilgrove** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:27 pm

UCDF wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
I do?

Please, do keep telling me what views I "have to have".

"Plus, wouldn't it sort of be incest considering he created everyone?"

That.

Apparently you need to get your humor fixed.

by **Ceannairceach** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:28 pm

UCUMAY wrote:
Copenhagen Metropolis wrote:Does it matter whether it's a choice or not? I don't think it does.

Did you choose to like men or women?

I think he means "Even if it is a choice, that doesn't mean people should be discriminated against".

by **UCDF** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:28 pm

Wilgrove wrote:
UCDF wrote:"Plus, wouldn't it sort of be incest considering he created everyone?"

That.

Apparently you need to get your humor fixed.

It's not funny when he's talking about god.

by **GeneralHaNor** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:28 pm

The Corparation wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Psychology is the new religion

If it has a Dr. in it's name, it can't be questioned

No. No its not. Its people like you who think psychology is bullshit that contribute to lack of care for the mentally deranged. Which leads to things like the Arizona Massacre.

If you think you can place the actions of that man on my doorstep you are mistaken.

I've struggled with clinical depression my whole life, I've never once stated the psychology is not a science.

by **Wilgrove** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:29 pm

UCDF wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Apparently you need to get your humor fixed.

It's not funny when he's talking about god.

I'm sure Yahweh has a sense of humor too.

by **Ceannairceach** » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:29 pm

UCDF wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:
Apparently you need to get your humor fixed.

It's not funny when he's talking about god.

Is the pope OK? How about Jesus?

Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here	A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.	Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End ~~2020~~ 2024	WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety	This Cell is intentionally blank.

It's a Choice.....Oh Really?

Who is online