
by Wilgrove » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:30 pm

by Fionnuala_Saoirse » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:33 pm
Wilgrove wrote: I mean if it's a choice, then you should have no problem with the simple act of making out with someone of your own gender.

by Tokos » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:35 pm

by You-Gi-Owe » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:35 pm
Wilgrove wrote:So in the thread about discrimination by a BnB against a homosexual couple, the topic of homosexuality being a choice came up. Rather than hijack the thread, I thought I'd create another thread here dealing with the topic. This has been one of those arguments that the social Conservative and right wing love to tout out from time to time. "Arrgghhh It's a choice, homosexuality is a choice!"
Oh really? Ok, so by that logic, Heterosexuality is also a choice. I mean if you can be choose to be gay, then you can choose to be straight. So, my question to those who believe that homosexuality is a choice is this. Why not make out with a person of the same gender? I mean if it's a choice, then you should have no problem with the simple act of making out with someone of your own gender.
As for the rest of us, what are your thoughts on this whole mythos about homosexuality being a choice?

by Neo Art » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:36 pm

by Ceannairceach » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:36 pm
Wilgrove wrote:As for the rest of us, what are your thoughts on this whole mythos about homosexuality being a choice?

by Fionnuala_Saoirse » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:37 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Why not? By the Social Conservative logic, if homosexuality is a choice, then any straight person, should have no problem, in choosing to engage in a sexual act with someone of the same gender.

by GothicLust » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:38 pm
Wilgrove wrote:So in the thread about discrimination by a BnB against a homosexual couple, the topic of homosexuality being a choice came up. Rather than hijack the thread, I thought I'd create another thread here dealing with the topic. This has been one of those arguments that the social Conservative and right wing love to tout out from time to time. "Arrgghhh It's a choice, homosexuality is a choice!"
Oh really? Ok, so by that logic, Heterosexuality is also a choice. I mean if you can be choose to be gay, then you can choose to be straight. So, my question to those who believe that homosexuality is a choice is this. Why not make out with a person of the same gender? I mean if it's a choice, then you should have no problem with the simple act of making out with someone of your own gender.
As for the rest of us, what are your thoughts on this whole mythos about homosexuality being a choice?

by The Norwegian Blue » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:38 pm


by Wilgrove » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:39 pm
The Norwegian Blue wrote:It's total nonsense, but "why don't you make out with someone of your own gender?" isn't the best way to counter it, as it's eminently possible to choose to make out with someone you're not attracted to; actors do so all the time. Far better to challenge people to prove their ability to be attracted to their own gender. If sexuality were really a choice, everyone ought to be able to masturbate to orgasm while looking at pictures of anyone, since one could just choose to find them sexually attractive. So, for straight dudes who think sexuality is a choice - go wank to a picture of Ron Jeremy, and then we'll talk.

by The Bleeding Roses » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:40 pm
The Norwegian Blue wrote:It's total nonsense, but "why don't you make out with someone of your own gender?" isn't the best way to counter it, as it's eminently possible to choose to make out with someone you're not attracted to; actors do so all the time. Far better to challenge people to prove their ability to be attracted to their own gender. If sexuality were really a choice, everyone ought to be able to masturbate to orgasm while looking at pictures of anyone, since one could just choose to find them sexually attractive. So, for straight dudes who think sexuality is a choice - go wank to a picture of Ron Jeremy, and then we'll talk.

by Neo Art » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:40 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:I've generally thought that it's a sub-conscious choice. I really doubt a genetic link. I think the human animal is a hedonist, at heart. Thoughts?

by Central Slavia » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:41 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by Wilgrove » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:41 pm
The Bleeding Roses wrote:The Norwegian Blue wrote:It's total nonsense, but "why don't you make out with someone of your own gender?" isn't the best way to counter it, as it's eminently possible to choose to make out with someone you're not attracted to; actors do so all the time. Far better to challenge people to prove their ability to be attracted to their own gender. If sexuality were really a choice, everyone ought to be able to masturbate to orgasm while looking at pictures of anyone, since one could just choose to find them sexually attractive. So, for straight dudes who think sexuality is a choice - go wank to a picture of Ron Jeremy, and then we'll talk.
Who hasn't jerked to a Ron picture?

by Ceannairceach » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:42 pm
Central Slavia wrote:It is normal to stuff a hamburger into your mouth.
Stuffing it into your ear would be a sign of a mental illness.
Not like a healthy person can't do the above, he just really really doesn't want to.


by Central Slavia » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:43 pm
Glorious Homeland wrote:
You would be wrong. There's something wrong with the Americans, the Japanese are actually insane, the Chinese don't seem capable of free-thought and just defer judgement to the most powerful strong man, the Russians are quite like that, only more aggressive and mad, and Belarus? Hah.
Omnicracy wrote:The Soviet Union did not support pro-Soviet governments, it compleatly controled them. The U.S. did not controle the corrupt regiems it set up against the Soviet Union, it just sugested things and changed leaders if they weer not takeing enough sugestions
Great Nepal wrote:Please stick to OFFICIAL numbers. Why to go to scholars,[cut]

by GothicLust » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:46 pm
Central Slavia wrote:It is normal to stuff a hamburger into your mouth.
Stuffing it into your ear would be a sign of a mental illness.
Not like a healthy person can't do the above, he just really really doesn't want to.

by Neo Art » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:46 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Central Slavia wrote:It is a problem of the sexual instinct, similar to zoophillia , necrophillia, to lesser extent fetishism, voyeurism, froteurism or exhibitionism
Only problem with that, is that homosexuality was declared NOT a mental illness in the 70s, so the DSM-IV and beyond, does not list Homosexuality as a mental illness. Try again.

by GothicLust » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:47 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Central Slavia wrote:It is a problem of the sexual instinct, similar to zoophillia , necrophillia, to lesser extent fetishism, voyeurism, froteurism or exhibitionism
Only problem with that, is that homosexuality was declared NOT a mental illness in the 70s, so the DSM-IV and beyond, does not list Homosexuality as a mental illness. Try again.

by Neo Art » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:47 pm
GothicLust wrote:Central Slavia wrote:It is normal to stuff a hamburger into your mouth.
Stuffing it into your ear would be a sign of a mental illness.
Not like a healthy person can't do the above, he just really really doesn't want to.
Homosexuals by and large do not "do it in the ear".
Fail at understanding the mechanics of gay sex.

by GothicLust » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:48 pm

by Wilgrove » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:49 pm
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is published by the American Psychiatric Association and provides a common language and standard criteria for the classification of mental disorders. It is used in the United States and in varying degrees around the world, by clinicians, researchers, psychiatric drug regulation agencies, health insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and policy makers.

by Neo Art » Wed Jan 19, 2011 3:49 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Dazchan, Floofybit, Greater Miami Shores 3, Hrofguard, Laka Strolistandiler, Nora States, Ryemarch, Shrillland, The 8th Dystopia, The Great Nevada Overlord, The Jamesian Republic, Valrifall, Yenikader
Advertisement