Advertisement

by Mike the Progressive » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:42 pm

by Wamitoria » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:44 pm
Mike the Progressive wrote:Wasn't Ronald Reagan governor of California?

by Mike the Progressive » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:42 pm

by New Kereptica » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:47 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

by Olthar » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:52 pm
New Kereptica wrote:Brock is my favourite Leader.

by Mike the Progressive » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:53 pm

by Wamitoria » Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:24 pm

by Nova Caeli » Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:27 pm
by The Chelbrusitan » Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:15 pm


by Occupied Deutschland » Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:35 pm
Nova Caeli wrote:He's 75? damn we need a new libertarian and please dont mention his son he really is a sellout to the mainstream Republican Party. I am guessing its going to be Rons last run for election then Rand is going to take his place.


by Conserative Morality » Sat Jan 15, 2011 8:38 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Ayn Rand is still alive?

by Ragnarsdomr » Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:57 pm
Conservative Morality wrote:By accepting yourself and who you are. Accept violence. Accept aggression. Accept dominance. Not as a man, but as a human. Accept conflict, and find a place for it in life. Neither deny nor revel in it. Revel in one thing and one thing only: humanity. What higher goal is there, after all? Embrace who you are, what you are, and what you can be. Throw off the shackles of shame, refuse self-loathing, refuse misandry, refuse misogyny, refuse misanthropy, instead, love what you are. Love mankind, love man and woman, and love yourself.

by The Electronic Future » Sat Jan 15, 2011 10:37 pm

by New Kereptica » Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:41 am
Nova Caeli wrote:he really is a sellout to the mainstream Republican Party
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:21 am


by Risottia » Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:57 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Risottia wrote:
YAY! I make mods cry! I'M POWERFUL!!!
(poor Arch... I'm joking)
Dunno, Gladstone seemed a bit less effective in enacting his policies - from what I remember since... uhh... the last history class I took. That is in 1995.I may be biased because I'm currently writing a book chapter about the archaeology of Gladstonian Britain, but I'd argue that while both Disraeli and Gladstone were substantive figures, Gladstone was the single most substantive British politician of the Victorian era. His extraordinary series of accomplishments and reforms in his period of high power from 1859-1874, first as Chancellor of the Exchequer, then as Prime Minister, arguably make him the most substantive Western European politician of his day; yes, ahead of Bismarck. His second term as Prime Minister from 1880-1885, while not as effective as his first, still featured a record of reform that would be honourable by any other standard (not least of which was the Married Women's Property Act of 1882, which gave married women both separate property rights and legal recognition as individuals for the first time). Only his short third premiership in 1886 and final premiership in 1892-94 - both dominated by the issue of Irish Home Rule - were relative failures.
The most important difference between Disraeli and Gladstone is that where Disraeli more often than not enacted policies (many of them admittedly good ones) solely out of cynical political calculation, Gladstone was a conviction politician (though not always a consistent one). No wonder they hated each other; Disraeli saw Gladstone as a priggish hypocrite, and Gladstone saw Disraeli as an unprincipled opportunist. I don't know... maybe you're more used to the latter in Italy? Stern Victorian High Anglican moralist politicians of deep personal principle are out of fashion in this more cynical age, but I'd still choose Gladstone over Disraeli any day.
Gladstone's greatest failure was his inability to pass Irish Home Rule through the Conservative-dominated House of Lords. But that the Lords defeated him over the issue that dominated the last decade of his extraordinary political career didn't make him any less right as regards the policies he wanted to enact over Ireland.
Edit:
With help from both Wiki and the Roy Jenkins biography of Gladstone, I offer a brief list of just some of his domestic accomplishments in his first two terms as Prime Minister - which excludes his equally successful period as Chancellor (and note that from 1882-1885, he was both Prime Minister and Chancellor):
- Disestablishment of the minority Protestant Church of Ireland (1868)
- Introduction of national system of public education (1870)
- Introduction of the secret ballot for local and national elections (1872)
- Establishment of the High Court and Court of Appeal (1873)
- Gradual enactment of the Cardwell Reforms to the British armed forces, which - among other things - ended flogging and the sale of commissions
- Granting of property and legal rights to married women (1882)
- Series of additional electoral reforms to stamp out corruption and grant the counties [rural areas] the same rights as the boroughs [towns and cities] (1883-1884)
still His Archness wrote: Disraeli saw Gladstone as a priggish hypocrite, and Gladstone saw Disraeli as an unprincipled opportunist. I don't know... maybe you're more used to the latter in Italy?

by Pantera » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:02 pm
Marcurix wrote:Well in no particular order:
Otto von Bismarck
Margaret Thatcher
Winston Churchill
Oda Nobunaga
Tokugawa Ieyasu
FDR
Gaius Julius Caesar
Duke of Wellington
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bemolian Lands, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Fartsniffage, Gaybeans, Heavenly Assault, Ifreann, Lotha Demokratische-Republique, Neo-American States, New Constanta, Pizza Friday Forever91, Ryemarch, Uiiop, Valrifall
Advertisement