Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Republican or not, whoever did this is a sorry motherfucker. End of story.
Seriously insane motherfucker at that.
Advertisement

by Gauthier » Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:57 am
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Republican or not, whoever did this is a sorry motherfucker. End of story.

by Hathradic States » Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:59 am
Galloism wrote:Ryadn wrote:I don't understand this nation I live in anymore. I don't understand why it's become acceptable to what seems like an increasing portion of the population to meet political and ideological differences with violence. The shooting of Congresswoman Giffords; the death threats to Speaker Pelosi; the plan to murder members of the ACLU to start a "revolution" which was barely thwarted; what's happening to us? When did disagreement become a deadly threat, instead of a dearly held political right?
Umm....
1776, I believe.

by Christmahanikwanzikah » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:09 am
Wilgrove wrote:Ryadn wrote:I don't understand this nation I live in anymore. I don't understand why it's become acceptable to what seems like an increasing portion of the population to meet political and ideological differences with violence. The shooting of Congresswoman Giffords; the death threats to Speaker Pelosi; the plan to murder members of the ACLU to start a "revolution" which was barely thwarted; what's happening to us? When did disagreement become a deadly threat, instead of a dearly held political right?
I also wonder if all of this extremism would be happening if Obama was white.

by Galloism » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:10 am


by Hathradic States » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:13 am
Wilgrove wrote:Gauthier wrote:
Of course not. The rise in violence is an allergic reaction to a black man in the White House ordering coffee instead of serving it.
I do find it sad, and amusing that there are people out there, for the first time in American politics questioning whether or not the President was born in the USA.

by New Kilballyowen » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:16 am
Hathradic States wrote:Wilgrove wrote:
I do find it sad, and amusing that there are people out there, for the first time in American politics questioning whether or not the President was born in the USA.
True, but not the first time in American politics in which somebody seeking the office of President's birth has been questioned. If I recall correctly, George Romney's eligiblity to run for President was questioned during his 1968 presidential campaign.

by Farnhamia » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:18 am
New Kilballyowen wrote:Hathradic States wrote:True, but not the first time in American politics in which somebody seeking the office of President's birth has been questioned. If I recall correctly, George Romney's eligiblity to run for President was questioned during his 1968 presidential campaign.
And don't forget, people were question John McCain's eligibility to run in 2008, since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

by Hathradic States » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:20 am
New Kilballyowen wrote:Hathradic States wrote:True, but not the first time in American politics in which somebody seeking the office of President's birth has been questioned. If I recall correctly, George Romney's eligiblity to run for President was questioned during his 1968 presidential campaign.
And don't forget, people were question John McCain's eligibility to run in 2008, since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

by Wilgrove » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:21 am
New Kilballyowen wrote:Hathradic States wrote:True, but not the first time in American politics in which somebody seeking the office of President's birth has been questioned. If I recall correctly, George Romney's eligiblity to run for President was questioned during his 1968 presidential campaign.
And don't forget, people were question John McCain's eligibility to run in 2008, since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

by New Kilballyowen » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:21 am

by New Kilballyowen » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:23 am

by Free Soviets » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:26 am
New Kilballyowen wrote:And don't forget, people were question John McCain's eligibility to run in 2008, since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:27 am
IL Ruffino wrote:Sarah Palin is a fucking murderer, spewing her hatred and fear like drunken vomit from a college freshman. The right wing doesn't deserve the air they breathe, the families they create, and the power they gain. Scumbags, absolute and complete scumbags. I hope she's happy with herself, I hope they're all fucking happy with themselves with their reduced taxes and ignorance galore, it wont last forever and that gate in the clouds will remain locked when they approach. While they live in their mass produced heaven, I hope they're preparing to burn in hell.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Panzerjaeger » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:28 am
Free Soviets wrote:New Kilballyowen wrote:And don't forget, people were question John McCain's eligibility to run in 2008, since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.
only in the sense that he probably was technically ineligible, and therefore it was funny. nobody actually gave a shit. i mean, i was among the biggest pushers of the idea on NSG, and i think the entire concept of restricting the presidency to natural born citizens is a bit silly. and that was my sense of the general feeling everywhere it came up, too. a sort of "man, those guys are even more ridiculous than most people realize".
Caninope wrote:Toyota: Keep moving forward, even when you don't want to!
Christmahanikwanzikah wrote:Timothy McVeigh casts... Pyrotechnics!
Greater Americania wrote:lol "No Comrade Ivan! Don't stick your head in there! That's the wood chi...!"
New Kereptica wrote:Fascism: because people are too smart nowadays.

by Hathradic States » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:28 am

by New Kilballyowen » Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:30 am
Free Soviets wrote:New Kilballyowen wrote:And don't forget, people were question John McCain's eligibility to run in 2008, since he was born in the Panama Canal Zone.
only in the sense that he probably was technically ineligible, and therefore it was funny. nobody actually gave a shit. i mean, i was among the biggest pushers of the idea on NSG, and i think the entire concept of restricting the presidency to natural born citizens is a bit silly. and that was my sense of the general feeling everywhere it came up, too. a sort of "man, those guys are even more ridiculous than most people realize".

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:10 am
Jostedule wrote:Marsini wrote:Link?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_congresswoman_shot
The scumbag even shot a 9 year old child. So much for the rant earlier. We were all wrong.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Ta suil » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:12 am

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:24 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Communist Winnipeg » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:31 am
Ta suil wrote:essentially this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/ns/ ... /#40982787
Between that link and the youtube of the Congresswoman's Republican opponents speech I posted a couple of pages ago, I think thats all we need - psycho overly excited by over the top right wing retoric 'does the right thing' in his mind and kills liberals.
by Nobel Hobos » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:51 am

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:55 am
Kalibarr wrote:Why do his politics and religion even matter? He shot up a bunch of people and killed several, does it really matter if he's a communist or a tea partier?
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Wikkiwallana » Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:08 am
Terraius wrote:Galloism wrote:Which narrowed the circumstances in which a restriction can be placed on the freedom of speech.
Imminent lawless action is quite... ahem, clear. Putting a gun on a history book and taking a picture of it is not, in of itself, indicative of "imminent lawless action".
Obviously I was looking at the bigger picture and the various videos, statements, and other works that came from him which clearly showed someone who was violent and had violent thoughts and able to carry out such violence, as opposed to some guy who was just pissed off and blogged about DA EBIL GOVERNMENTS.
If an Arab American took a picture with a bomb on a textbook the FBI would have an entire fucking divison swarming his residence within the day, but when a seemingly harmless white boy does stuff like this for YEARS, everyone turns a cheek.
Until he blows someones brains.
Ahh, sweet smell of liberty.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Dimetrodon Empire, Escalia, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Glomb, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Rary, The Holy Rat
Advertisement