Marsini wrote:Galloism wrote:If you want them to suffer, there are more effective ways.
If you just want them to die, there are more effective ways.
Why go with an antiquated form of execution that isn't that good at either?
It is cheap, reuseable, and relatively devoid of pain- so far as we know. I am not going for suffering, I merely believe that this individual is a threat to society and that supporting him with the prison system is not nearly as economical as stringing him up.
I understand the want for justice, but it seems that you have already concluded his guilt -- which is understandable based on the fact the perpatrator was apprehended at the scene -- but I thought that we as a society also take into account a person's state of mind and if they had the mental capacity to tell right from wrong...just a thought.
Although I can sympathize with your position, I often feel that drunk drivers that kill people should be tried and punished for murder rather than manslaughter (what a wasted concept) having lost a few members of my family to drunk drivers...but nonetheless we can't ignore our legal system or the rights of the accused because it's too expensive or inconvenient...
The real tragedy is, despite what we do to the accused, the victim and thier familys are never given true justice or made whole again.





