GeneralHaNor wrote:Boy you sure showed him
It's nice when someone comes along who's opinions are facts by virtue of them being feminist
You're not exactly the poster boy for credibility yourself, you know.
Advertisement

by Geniasis » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:21 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Boy you sure showed him
It's nice when someone comes along who's opinions are facts by virtue of them being feminist
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by The Norwegian Blue » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:49 pm
Bottle wrote:The Norwegian Blue wrote:
Are you shitting me? The two main characters on Everybody Loves Raymond are a successful sports journalist and his homemaker wife. He is presented as being great at his career but incompetent at household management. She is routinely mocked for being an insufficiently good cook. (Interestingly, for all that all the characters routinely insult her cooking, none of the men ever cook anything for themselves.) And you think this show exists because feminism went too far?
You said it better, and first. YOU WIN THIS ROUND!

by Bottle » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:51 pm
The Norwegian Blue wrote:Bottle wrote:You said it better, and first. YOU WIN THIS ROUND!
Hehe.
It just makes my head hurt to hear the standard "dopey husband with a job that will at least occasionally be relevant to the plot but who finds cooking and cleaning to be scary foreign concepts, disproportionately hot wife who is either a homemaker or whose job is mentioned in passing roughly twice ever and who handles all those householdy things because obviously hubby can't fold his own socks, and 2.4 children, who will generally encompass some combination of a pretty but painfully stupid daughter, a son who is hilariously bizarre because he likes school and doesn't like football, and a precociously annoying small child" sitcom used an example of how "feminism has gone too far." It's like pointing to a minstrel show and saying, "See, look how the civil rights movement has gone too far!"

by GeneralHaNor » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:01 pm
Bottle wrote: the disproportionately attractive ....women
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:05 pm

by Bottle » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:08 pm

by GeneralHaNor » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:09 pm
Dakini wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
This shit always pisses me off
what?, less attractive men don't deserve the love of "Pretty" women
Complete bullshit
Have you ever seen a show where a heterosexual couple has a disproportionately attractive man?
Are less attractive women undeserving of the love of handsome men?
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:09 pm
Bottle wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
This shit always pisses me off
what?, less attractive men don't deserve the love of "Pretty" women
Complete bullshit
What pisses you off exactly? That less attractive men are frequently portrayed in culture as deserving supermodel girlfriends, while the reverse has seldom (if ever?) been shown?
Because seriously. Can you name for me ONE example of a movie or TV show in the last, say, 10 years in which a fat woman has been shown successfully partnered with a thin, attractive man? Can you name an example of a sitcom with an ugly wife who has a hotty husband? Because I would bet that I can name at least 40 shows and movies that show the "less attractive man" winning the love of a pretty woman.

by Bottle » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:12 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Dakini wrote:Have you ever seen a show where a heterosexual couple has a disproportionately attractive man?
Are less attractive women undeserving of the love of handsome men?
obviously not, have you seen my GF?
under the formula bottle seems to want, I wouldn't be allowed to be with her, she would die alone with 15 birds, and uncountable cats.

by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:13 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Dakini wrote:Have you ever seen a show where a heterosexual couple has a disproportionately attractive man?
Are less attractive women undeserving of the love of handsome men?
obviously not, have you seen my GF?
under the formula bottle seems to want, I wouldn't be allowed to be with her, she would die alone with 15 birds, and uncountable cats.

by GeneralHaNor » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:14 pm
Bottle wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
obviously not, have you seen my GF?
under the formula bottle seems to want, I wouldn't be allowed to be with her, she would die alone with 15 birds, and uncountable cats.
Wait, so you're a TV character? Your life is a TV show?
Because that's what we're talking about. The goal posts are over here, and sorry, but they're not moving just for you.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by St George of England » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:14 pm
Dakini wrote:Bottle wrote:What pisses you off exactly? That less attractive men are frequently portrayed in culture as deserving supermodel girlfriends, while the reverse has seldom (if ever?) been shown?
Because seriously. Can you name for me ONE example of a movie or TV show in the last, say, 10 years in which a fat woman has been shown successfully partnered with a thin, attractive man? Can you name an example of a sitcom with an ugly wife who has a hotty husband? Because I would bet that I can name at least 40 shows and movies that show the "less attractive man" winning the love of a pretty woman.
It even happens in cartoons.

by GeneralHaNor » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:17 pm
Dakini wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
obviously not, have you seen my GF?
under the formula bottle seems to want, I wouldn't be allowed to be with her, she would die alone with 15 birds, and uncountable cats.
...because you're significantly less attractive than she is and you appear on television? I don't get it.
Bottle is complaining about television persistently pairing hot women with average or unattractive men while the reverse is never true. Sometimes they'll pair people who are similar levels of attractiveness and hot women will be with hot men and ugly women will be with ugly men, but if there's a mismatch it always goes that the female is more attractive.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:17 pm

by Bottle » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:19 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Bottle wrote:Wait, so you're a TV character? Your life is a TV show?
Because that's what we're talking about. The goal posts are over here, and sorry, but they're not moving just for you.
So what is that you are demanding?, that only the attractive pair off with each other in tv land, and that uggos stick to there own kind
Exactly what is it that you want.

by GeneralHaNor » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:20 pm
Bottle wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:
So what is that you are demanding?, that only the attractive pair off with each other in tv land, and that uggos stick to there own kind
Exactly what is it that you want.
For starters, I want you to actually read what I post and try responding to THAT, rather than making up strawmen to yell at. When you're ready to do that, I'll be happy to chat with you further.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by Geniasis » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:21 pm
Bottle wrote:What pisses you off exactly? That less attractive men are frequently portrayed in culture as deserving supermodel girlfriends, while the reverse has seldom (if ever?) been shown?
Because seriously. Can you name for me ONE example of a movie or TV show in the last, say, 10 years in which a fat woman has been shown successfully partnered with a thin, attractive man? Can you name an example of a sitcom with an ugly wife who has a hotty husband? Because I would bet that I can name at least 40 shows and movies that show the "less attractive man" winning the love of a pretty woman. It is THE TITLE OF FUCKING MOVIES ferchrissakes (see the recent She's Out Of Your League).
It's the constant and unrelenting sexism of it that is the problem, not the fact that sometimes a less attractive person gets a more attractive partner.
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:23 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Dakini wrote:...because you're significantly less attractive than she is and you appear on television? I don't get it.
Bottle is complaining about television persistently pairing hot women with average or unattractive men while the reverse is never true. Sometimes they'll pair people who are similar levels of attractiveness and hot women will be with hot men and ugly women will be with ugly men, but if there's a mismatch it always goes that the female is more attractive.
Reserve the top.
and why does it matter, what social good will come from changing television practices, producers produce what people want to see, and clearly the audience has spoken
unless you believe hollywood should be nationalized and remain the Glorious People's Department of Social Engineering. and that we should be forced to watched what you want us to accept

by Geniasis » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:25 pm
Dakini wrote:At any rate, there's a reason I don't watch sitcoms (well, there are many reasons, blatant sexism is just one).
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:26 pm

by The Norwegian Blue » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:28 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Bottle wrote:Wait, so you're a TV character? Your life is a TV show?
Because that's what we're talking about. The goal posts are over here, and sorry, but they're not moving just for you.
So what is that you are demanding?, that only the attractive pair off with each other in tv land, and that uggos stick to there own kind
Exactly what is it that you want.

by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:28 pm


by Dakini » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:30 pm


by Geniasis » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:32 pm
Dakini wrote:Well, another reason would be "I only have three channels". But I heard that Modern Family had a gay couple who aren't screamingly flamboyant, which makes it potentially interesting.
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by The Norwegian Blue » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Ebenia, Martis Urbe, Past beans, Raskana, Umeria, Wallingtonshire
Advertisement