Feminism, misogyny and misandry.

by **Neo Art** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:55 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
oh come on, when have facts gotten in anyone's way?

Facts scmacts, you can use FACTS to prove anything even REMOTELY true.

They went out with buckled shoes and smart-ass lawyers.

Oh feck off. I look fabulous in buckled shoes.

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:57 pm

Neo Art wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:They went out with buckled shoes and smart-ass lawyers.

Oh feck off. I look fabulous in buckled shoes.

Oh ho, funny. I heard you're the reason they went out.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:57 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Geniasis wrote:
And because you clearly have an axe to grind against feminism, and women in general (85% fail your test, right?), your "observations" are similarly tainted. Especially since I have observed the opposite. We clearly can't both be right.

Indeed
if you admit you are incorrect
you may leave with your honor

NA has already pointed out the hilarity of this "honor" business, but I just want to note that you are apparently on the record as implying that it's "dishonorable" to refuse to admit when you're incorrect. Is that so, Mr. I've Never Seen A Feminist Stand Up For Men's Rights?

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:58 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Neo Art wrote:
Oh feck off. I look fabulous in buckled shoes.

Oh ho, funny. I heard you're the reason they went out.

Exactly. Everyone else took one look at him and said, "Well, shit, we can't compete with that!"

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:00 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Oh ho, funny. I heard you're the reason they went out.

Exactly. Everyone else took one look at him and said, "Well, shit, we can't compete with that!"

Well at least that's how it often goes in General threads.

by **Galloism** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:04 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:Oh ho, funny. I heard you're the reason they went out.

Exactly. Everyone else took one look at him and said, "Well, shit, we can't compete with that!"

Exactly. Even LG was noted leaving in shame, unable to compete with such brilliant comedy.

by **United Dependencies** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:05 pm

Neo Art wrote:
United Dependencies wrote:Awww. Thanks for making me feel like an asshole.

It's what I do.

by **Neo Art** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:06 pm

hm, when did I develop a private cadre of sycophants? I could get used to this.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:06 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
The Norwegian Blue wrote:
Exactly. Everyone else took one look at him and said, "Well, shit, we can't compete with that!"

Well at least that's how it often goes in General threads.

Exactly. Wherever he goes, NA leaves awe and fear in his wake. It is foretold that in the last days of the world, he shall rise up and devour the ignorant, the foolish, and those who misunderstand basic constitutional law, and they shall call him...Cthuljew!

...he's going to kill me now, you know.

by **United Dependencies** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:07 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:

Well at least that's how it often goes in General threads.

Exactly. Wherever he goes, NA leaves awe and fear in his wake. It is foretold that in the last days of the world, he shall rise up and devour the ignorant, the foolish, and those who misunderstand basic constitutional law, and they shall call him...Cthuljew!

...he's going to kill me now, you know.

Totally worth it.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:07 pm

Neo Art wrote:hm, when did I develop a private cadre of sycophants? I could get used to this.

It's good to be the king.

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:07 pm

Neo Art wrote:hm, when did I develop a private cadre of sycophants? I could get used to this.

You got used to it long before it even happened.

by **Neo Art** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:07 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
Neo Art wrote:hm, when did I develop a private cadre of sycophants? I could get used to this.

It's good to be the king.

The sad part is, that was my first idea of that post, word for word, but I figured only you would get it.

by **Neo Art** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:08 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Neo Art wrote:hm, when did I develop a private cadre of sycophants? I could get used to this.

You got used to it long before it even happened.

Yes....well...shut up Parkus before I cut you with my Sword of Thousand Truths.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:08 pm

Neo Art wrote:
The Norwegian Blue wrote:
It's good to be the king.

The sad part is, that was my first idea of that post, word for word, but I figured only you would get it.

I knew it.

by **The Parkus Empire** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:09 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:Exactly. Wherever he goes, NA leaves awe and fear in his wake. It is foretold that in the last days of the world, he shall rise up and devour the ignorant, the foolish, and those who misunderstand basic constitutional law, and they shall call him...Cthuljew!

...he's going to kill me now, you know.

That's what you get for being his only weakness.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:09 pm

Neo Art wrote:Sword of Thousand Truths.

I prefer "Hebrew Hammer," but that one's not bad either.

by **Farnhamia** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:09 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:

Well at least that's how it often goes in General threads.

Exactly. Wherever he goes, NA leaves awe and fear in his wake. It is foretold that in the last days of the world, he shall rise up and devour the ignorant, the foolish, and those who misunderstand basic constitutional law, and they shall call him...Cthuljew!

...he's going to kill me now, you know.

Great, now I have an image of him with a Hasid's hat, beard and peyes, only with tentacles.

by **The Norwegian Blue** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:10 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
The Norwegian Blue wrote:
Exactly. Wherever he goes, NA leaves awe and fear in his wake. It is foretold that in the last days of the world, he shall rise up and devour the ignorant, the foolish, and those who misunderstand basic constitutional law, and they shall call him...Cthuljew!

...he's going to kill me now, you know.

Great, now I have an image of him with a Hasid's hat, beard and peyes, only with tentacles.

That's not far off, aside from the hat, beard, and peyes.

by **GeneralHaNor** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:18 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Indeed
if you admit you are incorrect
you may leave with your honor

NA has already pointed out the hilarity of this "honor" business, but I just want to note that you are apparently on the record as implying that it's "dishonorable" to refuse to admit when you're incorrect. Is that so, Mr. I've Never Seen A Feminist Stand Up For Men's Rights?

Hardy har har
Claiming to have a pro-men's rights agenda and actually defending it, are clearly separate.

by **Geniasis** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:20 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:Hardy har har
Claiming to have a pro-men's rights agenda and actually defending it, are clearly separate.

As is claiming to have honor and actually showing any.

I sincerely thank you for demonstrating the contrast so clearly.

by **GeneralHaNor** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:20 pm

Geniasis wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:Psh, Science
Reading is for Elitists

Right, and you question my honor.

Am I watching some kind of mediocre comedy show or something?

Oh if only I were actually a Comedian
Then it would be funny
and not tragic

by **GeneralHaNor** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:21 pm

Geniasis wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:Hardy har har
Claiming to have a pro-men's rights agenda and actually defending it, are clearly separate.

As is claiming to have honor and actually showing any.

I sincerely thank you for demonstrating the contrast so clearly.

I never claimed to have Honor
I might of assumed others had it,
but never attributed that quality to myself

by **United Dependencies** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:22 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
The Norwegian Blue wrote:
NA has already pointed out the hilarity of this "honor" business, but I just want to note that you are apparently on the record as implying that it's "dishonorable" to refuse to admit when you're incorrect. Is that so, Mr. I've Never Seen A Feminist Stand Up For Men's Rights?

Hardy har har
Claiming to have a pro-men's rights agenda and actually defending it, are clearly separate.

So you can prove that in every single instance where there were feminist who claimed to stand for men's rights that in all of the cases they were actually lieing?

by **GeneralHaNor** » Mon Jan 10, 2011 6:24 pm

United Dependencies wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Hardy har har
Claiming to have a pro-men's rights agenda and actually defending it, are clearly separate.

So you can prove that in every single instance where there were feminist who claimed to stand for men's rights that in all of the cases they were actually lieing?

Nope
But neither can you prove that such defense was always genuine in every single case
I doubt that it's even the majority
or even a small minority

Feminism, misogyny and misandry.

Who is online