Arborlawn wrote:I would be producing the sperm that is required for a woman to become pregnant, it is a mutual cooperation.
I could go for a little singular cooperation.
*ahem*
Advertisement

by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:37 pm
Arborlawn wrote:I would be producing the sperm that is required for a woman to become pregnant, it is a mutual cooperation.

by Dempublicents1 » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:38 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:Indeed, Revolutionary Thinkers and Leaders are always despised by the mainstream, until there ideas are either adopted or crushed

by Bottle » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:38 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:38 pm
Arborlawn wrote:Feminism is naturally incompatible with society because it attempts to change the natural instinct of humanity.

by Desperate Measures » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:39 pm

by Desperate Measures » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:39 pm
Bottle wrote:Arborlawn wrote:
I would be producing the sperm that is required for a woman to become pregnant, it is a mutual cooperation.
Just like how, if you and I were to bake cookies, and I contributed half of the chocolate chips while you contributed the rest of the chips, all the other ingredients, all the tools, the kitchen, and did all the cooking, it would be "a mutual cooperation" to make the cookies.
Fucking perfect
by Dempublicents1 » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:40 pm

by Arborlawn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:40 pm
Bottle wrote:Arborlawn wrote:
I would be producing the sperm that is required for a woman to become pregnant, it is a mutual cooperation.
Just like how, if you and I were to bake cookies, and I contributed half of the chocolate chips while you contributed the rest of the chips, all the other ingredients, all the tools, the kitchen, and did all the cooking, it would be "a mutual cooperation" to make the cookies.

by Ryadn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:42 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:Actually it would make me a humanist
you see to be under the false impression that feminism is also a pro male agenda
it's not.
Here ladies and gentlemen, the fellow who owns and controls the feminist movement, here to tell us feminists what feminism is really about!

by The Norwegian Blue » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:42 pm
Arborlawn wrote:Feminism is naturally incompatible with society because it attempts to change the natural instinct of humanity.

by Bottle » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:42 pm
Arborlawn wrote:Bottle wrote:Just like how, if you and I were to bake cookies, and I contributed half of the chocolate chips while you contributed the rest of the chips, all the other ingredients, all the tools, the kitchen, and did all the cooking, it would be "a mutual cooperation" to make the cookies.
Why would I be making cookies, I would be working for you to have the money to make those cookies


by Desperate Measures » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:43 pm
Arborlawn wrote:Bottle wrote:Just like how, if you and I were to bake cookies, and I contributed half of the chocolate chips while you contributed the rest of the chips, all the other ingredients, all the tools, the kitchen, and did all the cooking, it would be "a mutual cooperation" to make the cookies.
Why would I be making cookies, I would be working for you to have the money to make those cookies

by Bottle » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:44 pm

by Arborlawn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:45 pm

by Desperate Measures » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:46 pm

by Ryadn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:48 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:The Norwegian Blue wrote:No, because words have meanings. Again, I can define "banana" as "a pile of human excrement," but the rest of the word is going to go right on defining "banana" as "banana." The fact that you don't like the word "feminism" does not change the actual dictionary definition of the word "feminism."
Nice dodge on actually responding to my point, by the way. I'm a feminist. I stated earlier in this thread that I advocate for paternity leave. You have now unambiguously witnessed a self-proclaimed feminist supporting a right that men are not infrequently denied on the basis of their gender. You should probably retract your statement now.
And I'm pretty sure I haven't seen anyone defend male victims of female rape on this board but feminists.

by Arborlawn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:48 pm

by Geniasis » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:49 pm
GeneralHaNor wrote:I'm sure this is supposed to be insulting, by implying that my positions aren't motivated by thought.
Again, YOU DON'T KNOW ME.
Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.
Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

by Bottle » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:49 pm

by Ryadn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:50 pm
Arborlawn wrote:Feminism is naturally incompatible with society because it attempts to change the natural instinct of humanity.

by Bottle » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:51 pm
Ryadn wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:
And I'm pretty sure I haven't seen anyone defend male victims of female rape on this board but feminists.
I know I've personally argued against societal acceptance of statutory rape committed by females against males at least half a dozen times on these boards. Clearly a sneaky form of misandry, proposing that molesting a juvenile male is just as bad as molesting a juvenile female.

by Arborlawn » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:53 pm
Bottle wrote:Arborlawn wrote:
It is really simple, a man is supposed to work for his wife, family, and God. A woman is supposed to serve her family and God.
It is really simple.
See, and this is why I don't even bother bringing out the claws until at least 5 posts in any more. I want real prey to scratch up, not these dull scratching posts.

by GeneralHaNor » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:55 pm
The Soviet Technocracy wrote:GeneralHaNor wrote:Actually it would make me a humanist
you see to be under the false impression that feminism is also a pro male agenda
it's not.
protip: feminism has nothing to do with reducing rights for men, just bringing the rights of women to an equal standard
you know, equal pay, equal job opportunities, universal suffrage, etc.
clearly freedom is an intrusion upon your morals
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

by The Norwegian Blue » Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:55 pm
Bottle wrote:Ryadn wrote:
I know I've personally argued against societal acceptance of statutory rape committed by females against males at least half a dozen times on these boards. Clearly a sneaky form of misandry, proposing that molesting a juvenile male is just as bad as molesting a juvenile female.
Ditto. When I argue that it's not okay for adult women to molest little boys, it is invariably the anti-feminist men who inform me that it's "every boy's fantasy" to be raped by his teacher, and that men can't be raped by women because men exist in a perpetual state of consent for any heterosexual encounter, and that any woman who thinks otherwise is deluding herself into thinking that men have standards of any sort beyond "is it warm and female."

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Arvenia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Ethel mermania, Free Papua Republic, Moltian, Negev Chan, Picairn, Port Caverton, Saint Monkey, The Huskar Social Union, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Varisland
Advertisement