NATION

PASSWORD

Feminism, misogyny and misandry.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ryadn
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8028
Founded: Sep 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ryadn » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:19 pm

Okay, I just finished page 37, and I cannot. Fucking. Go on. The collective ignorance and vitriol is astounding. I'm trying hard to believe that some of these "non-feminist women" coming out of the woodwork (and hi, we haven't seen you around here until now) are just people trolling and trying to use an appeal to authority---"I (play a woman on the internet) and I'm okay with misogyny, so shut up, feminazis!" but I have to admit the possibility that people who have somehow learned to use a computer are really still that blindingly misinformed. I now have less faith in humanity than when I signed on a few minutes ago. Well done.
"I hate you! I HATE you collectivist society. You can't tell me what to do, you're not my REAL legitimate government. As soon as my band takes off, and I invent a perpetual motion machine, I am SO out of here!" - Neo Art

"But please, explain how a condom breaking is TOTALLY different from a tire getting blown out. I mean, in one case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own, and in the other case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own." - The Norwegian Blue

User avatar
Batuni
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Batuni » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:32 pm

Unhealthy2 wrote:
The Norwegian Blue wrote:The thing with "no true Scotsman" is that it's only a fallacy when it's, you know, fallacious. It's not actually a fallacy to say, "Susan isn't a true Scotsman because she's not from Scotland, has no Scottish heritage or ancestry, and isn't a man."

The fallacy occurs when you invent your own defining quality, not when you use the actual dictionary definition of a word. It would be a "no true Scotsman" fallacy to say "this person who believes in the social, legal, and economic equality of the sexes but does not believe affirmative action is a good way to achieve that end is not a feminist." It very definitely is NOT a "no true Scotsman" fallacy to say "this person who does not believe in the social, legal, and economic equality of the sexes is not a feminist, because that's the goddamn definition of the word 'feminist'."


But how do we decide that belief in equality of the sexes is the correct definition of feminism? What if someone said that feminism is defined as the belief that pumpkins are evil? Why would they necessarily be wrong?


Because they would be inaccurate?

Feminism is an ideology, a concept expounding certain beliefs and goals; to wit, that equality of the genders (or sexual identity/gender/sex... I get confused when we deconstruct the gender binary, I'll admit.) is both moral and desirable, and should be striven for.

A Scotsman is just someone born within a certain geographic location.

If we wish to argue about whom gets to define the term, perhaps we should look to those who coined it in the first place?

Otherwise we can also debate the meanings of 'Belief', 'Pumpkin', and 'Evil.' Or Definition! I mean, who gets to say that 'Definition' can't mean 'Supposition', or 'Ridiculed.'

Hmmm... "What if someone said that feminism is ridiculed as the belief that pumpkins are evil?"
People are a problem. - Douglas Adams

User avatar
Batuni
Envoy
 
Posts: 234
Founded: Feb 10, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Batuni » Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:54 pm

Ryadn wrote:Okay, I just finished page 37, and I cannot. Fucking. Go on. The collective ignorance and vitriol is astounding. I'm trying hard to believe that some of these "non-feminist women" coming out of the woodwork (and hi, we haven't seen you around here until now) are just people trolling and trying to use an appeal to authority---"I (play a woman on the internet) and I'm okay with misogyny, so shut up, feminazis!" but I have to admit the possibility that people who have somehow learned to use a computer are really still that blindingly misinformed. I now have less faith in humanity than when I signed on a few minutes ago. Well done.


The problem is that there is certainly a huge misconception as to what precisely feminism is. The name doesn't help, as to many people it rings of exclusionism (sorry lads, women only), which is only worsened when you see so-called feminists state that men cannot be feminists (maybe it's rare, I dunno, but I've seen it). Which is part of the reason some people prefer to use the term 'egalitarian.'

Then there are those, and we've seen so many on this thread, who mistake 'feminist' and 'misandrist', which isn't totally unfair, as many misandrists claim to be feminists, often without realising their own error.

Interestingly, the spell-checker doesn't recognise the terms 'misandry' or 'misandrist.'


I suppose one could conclude that what Feminism needs is a resurgence of public awareness, perhaps some sort of advertising campaign to highlight and clarify its goals.
One that includes their interest in assisting men as well as women, in order to lay to rest beliefs to the contrary.

Of course, given that Feminism is an ideology, rather than a company or a charity, or a political body, such a campaignis unlikely to the extreme.
People are a problem. - Douglas Adams

User avatar
Eskandapolis
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 411
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eskandapolis » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:47 pm

Batuni wrote:
Ryadn wrote:Okay, I just finished page 37, and I cannot. Fucking. Go on. The collective ignorance and vitriol is astounding. I'm trying hard to believe that some of these "non-feminist women" coming out of the woodwork (and hi, we haven't seen you around here until now) are just people trolling and trying to use an appeal to authority---"I (play a woman on the internet) and I'm okay with misogyny, so shut up, feminazis!" but I have to admit the possibility that people who have somehow learned to use a computer are really still that blindingly misinformed. I now have less faith in humanity than when I signed on a few minutes ago. Well done.


The problem is that there is certainly a huge misconception as to what precisely feminism is. The name doesn't help, as to many people it rings of exclusionism (sorry lads, women only), which is only worsened when you see so-called feminists state that men cannot be feminists (maybe it's rare, I dunno, but I've seen it). Which is part of the reason some people prefer to use the term 'egalitarian.'

Then there are those, and we've seen so many on this thread, who mistake 'feminist' and 'misandrist', which isn't totally unfair, as many misandrists claim to be feminists, often without realising their own error.

Interestingly, the spell-checker doesn't recognise the terms 'misandry' or 'misandrist.'


I suppose one could conclude that what Feminism needs is a resurgence of public awareness, perhaps some sort of advertising campaign to highlight and clarify its goals.
One that includes their interest in assisting men as well as women, in order to lay to rest beliefs to the contrary.

Of course, given that Feminism is an ideology, rather than a company or a charity, or a political body, such a campaignis unlikely to the extreme.

The problem is that many "misandrists" label themselves as feminists. Feminism and Misandry don't have more in common than "rational" patriotism and nazism, the latter uses the fears and ideals of the first and distorts them into more than an ideology. That's the reason I say I usually mention I'm in favour of "gender equality" as here a guy supporting femminism isn't well seen

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:56 pm

Eskandapolis wrote:The problem is that many "misandrists" label themselves as feminists. Feminism and Misandry don't have more in common than "rational" patriotism and nazism, the latter uses the fears and ideals of the first and distorts them into more than an ideology. That's the reason I say I usually mention I'm in favour of "gender equality" as here a guy supporting femminism isn't well seen


That's probably because gender-equality isn't well seen.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Fasciscia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 61
Founded: Jan 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Fasciscia » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:02 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Eskandapolis wrote:The problem is that many "misandrists" label themselves as feminists. Feminism and Misandry don't have more in common than "rational" patriotism and nazism, the latter uses the fears and ideals of the first and distorts them into more than an ideology. That's the reason I say I usually mention I'm in favour of "gender equality" as here a guy supporting femminism isn't well seen


That's probably because gender-equality isn't well seen.

Maybe, but I don't think that's the main factor. Here feminism is used by a lot of women who could be better described as "female chauvinists" who practically claim a man should be his wife's servant and her "sex toy"

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:05 pm

Fasciscia wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:
That's probably because gender-equality isn't well seen.

Maybe, but I don't think that's the main factor. Here feminism is used by a lot of women who could be better described as "female chauvinists" who practically claim a man should be his wife's servant and her "sex toy"

THIS is why I am a male that identifies as a feminist. Because it is completely awesome!
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:05 pm

Fasciscia wrote:Maybe, but I don't think that's the main factor. Here feminism is used by a lot of women who could be better described as "female chauvinists" who practically claim a man should be his wife's servant and her "sex toy"


Well hell, if women are so prominently dominant there, then I'd think you'd want to get in their favor.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:05 pm

Desperate Measures wrote:
Fasciscia wrote:Maybe, but I don't think that's the main factor. Here feminism is used by a lot of women who could be better described as "female chauvinists" who practically claim a man should be his wife's servant and her "sex toy"

THIS is why I am a male that identifies as a feminist. Because it is completely awesome!

Heh, another guy who's into sub. ;)
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:08 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:THIS is why I am a male that identifies as a feminist. Because it is completely awesome!

Heh, another guy who's into sub. ;)

Caught me....
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:28 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Fasciscia wrote:Maybe, but I don't think that's the main factor. Here feminism is used by a lot of women who could be better described as "female chauvinists" who practically claim a man should be his wife's servant and her "sex toy"


Well hell, if women are so prominently dominant there, then I'd think you'd want to get in their favor.


Yeah...no
I am already subservient to the state
I don't need another layer of masters

also, why does "Chauvinist" = Bad?
and "Feminist" = Good?

Define Feminism
The Define Chauvinism
and see if the definitions are "Congruent"
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:32 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:
Well hell, if women are so prominently dominant there, then I'd think you'd want to get in their favor.


Yeah...no
I am already subservient to the state
I don't need another layer of masters

also, why does "Chauvinist" = Bad?
and "Feminist" = Good?

Define Feminism
The Define Chauvinism
and see if the definitions are "Congruent"

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chauvinism
Last edited by The Parkus Empire on Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Geniasis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7531
Founded: Sep 28, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Geniasis » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:36 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chauvinism


i don't care what your "Facts" say
i know what i've observed
and i love haiku
Supporter of making [citation needed] the official NSG way to say "source?"

Myrensis wrote:I say turn it into a brothel, that way Muslims and Christians can be offended together.


DaWoad wrote:nah, she only fought because, as everyone knows, the brits can't make a decent purse to save their lives and she had a VERY important shopping trip coming up!


Reichskommissariat ost wrote:Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things.


Euronion wrote:because how dare me ever ever try to demand rights for myself, right men, we should just lie down and let the women trample over us, let them take awa our rights, our right to vote will be next just don't say I didn't warn ou

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:41 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Yeah...no
I am already subservient to the state
I don't need another layer of masters

also, why does "Chauvinist" = Bad?
and "Feminist" = Good?

Define Feminism
The Define Chauvinism
and see if the definitions are "Congruent"

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chauvinism


No results for chauvinism
please try again
and try not to fail
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:43 am

Geniasis wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chauvinism


i don't care what your "Facts" say
i know what i've observed
and i love haiku


You do such a spot on imitation
I can't wait to see your stand up act
Hurp Derp
Last edited by GeneralHaNor on Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:53 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:


No results for chauvinism
please try again
and try not to fail


There are five results. You try again.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:01 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
No results for chauvinism
please try again
and try not to fail


There are five results. You try again.


K
Not congruent, what does this tell us?
That being Pro-Male is bad
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:03 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:
There are five results. You try again.


K
Not congruent, what does this tell us?
That being Pro-Male is bad

Believing in the superiority of one's sex is bad, yes.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:08 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
K
Not congruent, what does this tell us?
That being Pro-Male is bad

Believing in the superiority of one's sex is bad, yes.


Let's experiment

Let's replace the gender specific nouns of the definition for feminism
"the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of men equal to those of women. "

What would you call this word?
Does it even exist?
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
The Theban Legion
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Theban Legion » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:12 am

So...what happens, for instance, in the military when the standard for a man is that he must maintain at all times combat readiness or risk being dishonourably discharged and or court martialed but a woman is allowed to be pregnant and miss a movement with little to no complaint. Does biology allow for such breaches of contract or should we apply feministic equality there too and demand that she be as constantly battle ready as the man?

User avatar
The Theban Legion
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Theban Legion » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:15 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
K
Not congruent, what does this tell us?
That being Pro-Male is bad

Believing in the superiority of one's sex is bad, yes.



But I will have to say that when I know that there is a woman kickboxer out there who could kick my head clean off, I don't want to imply there is a superiority of my sex only that there are different expectations of the sexes within society and until those expectations are made equal women don't deserve equality of station or reward (this is only in terms of the military, though there may be other examples).

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:16 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:Let's experiment

Let's replace the gender specific nouns of the definition for feminism
"the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of men equal to those of women. "

What would you call this word?
Does it even exist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:17 am

The Theban Legion wrote:So...what happens, for instance, in the military when the standard for a man is that he must maintain at all times combat readiness or risk being dishonourably discharged and or court martialed but a woman is allowed to be pregnant and miss a movement with little to no complaint. Does biology allow for such breaches of contract or should we apply feministic equality there too and demand that she be as constantly battle ready as the man?

Well, no, just like if a man accidentally gets his dick chopped off we don't expect him to function for movement just because a woman can 'cause she doesn't have a dick either. That's really not a good point.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:22 am

The Parkus Empire wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:Let's experiment

Let's replace the gender specific nouns of the definition for feminism
"the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of men equal to those of women. "

What would you call this word?
Does it even exist?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masculism


Your link specifically calls it an anti-feminist movement

so why do feminists claim the territory that this movement already covers?
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Ryadn
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8028
Founded: Sep 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ryadn » Wed Jan 12, 2011 2:24 am

Geniasis wrote:
The Parkus Empire wrote:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/chauvinism


i don't care what your "Facts" say
i know what i've observed
and i love haiku


I'll admit it, that restored a tiny measure of my faith in humanity. Which should really frighten us all.
"I hate you! I HATE you collectivist society. You can't tell me what to do, you're not my REAL legitimate government. As soon as my band takes off, and I invent a perpetual motion machine, I am SO out of here!" - Neo Art

"But please, explain how a condom breaking is TOTALLY different from a tire getting blown out. I mean, in one case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own, and in the other case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own." - The Norwegian Blue

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Brockton-by-the-Sea, Dreghland, Eire Agus Albion, Eragon Island, Gravlen, Grinning Dragon, Hirota, Maryland-Delaware, Ngelmish, Rary, Reich of the New World Order, The Matthew Islands, The Rio Grande River Basin, Uiiop, Unitria, Walo

Advertisement

Remove ads