Yes that is an awesome Horse.
Advertisement
by Greater Miami Shores » Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:58 pm
by Euroslavia » Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:59 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:*Gasp* "Oh look (insert authoritarian dictator here)" *fapfapfapfapfap*
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:01 pm
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:02 pm
by Greater Tezdrian » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:06 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:How is that trolling im critiquing his love for something he has never experienced. Just in a less orthodox and funnier manner.
by Euroslavia » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:07 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:How is that trolling im critiquing his love for something he has never experienced. Just in a less orthodox and funnier manner.
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:09 pm
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:12 pm
Euroslavia wrote:Mercator Terra wrote:How is that trolling im critiquing his love for something he has never experienced. Just in a less orthodox and funnier manner.
Spin it however you want, but it's still trolling. You came into a thread without even discussing what the actual thread was about and you even attempted to hijack the thread afterwards.
by Euroslavia » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:22 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:Euroslavia wrote:
Spin it however you want, but it's still trolling. You came into a thread without even discussing what the actual thread was about and you even attempted to hijack the thread afterwards.
That was coming after other posts with dictators pictures. Either or you have not looked at any of my previous posts so therefor I believe that you cant logically say I have "came in a thread without ever discussing what the actual thread was about ... ) I have made numerous other posts. And if you want to talk about hijacking you should of see the capitalist/socialist thread. There was a whole global warming tangent going on for a few pages.
by Greater Tezdrian » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:24 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:I found it funny. Either or you have never lived in a fascist regime so how do you know it will end up all nice and dandy. Also I just find it silly that you would blindly praise ones nation. Truthfully I wouldn't praise any nation/state.
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:27 pm
Euroslavia wrote:Mercator Terra wrote:That was coming after other posts with dictators pictures. Either or you have not looked at any of my previous posts so therefor I believe that you cant logically say I have "came in a thread without ever discussing what the actual thread was about ... ) I have made numerous other posts. And if you want to talk about hijacking you should of see the capitalist/socialist thread. There was a whole global warming tangent going on for a few pages.
There's only 1 picture of a leader previous to your post, and it was pages earlier (and used again later on). You posted the 2nd picture of a leader. I've gone through the entire thread. You've been warned, case closed. You're welcome to appeal the decision through the getting help page.
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:28 pm
Greater Tezdrian wrote:Mercator Terra wrote:I found it funny. Either or you have never lived in a fascist regime so how do you know it will end up all nice and dandy. Also I just find it silly that you would blindly praise ones nation. Truthfully I wouldn't praise any nation/state.
But, again, the point is that I did not find it funny, nor did Euroslavia. Also, I have no idea whether a fascist regime would end up fine and dandy, but I know that many 3P regimes did. And, I did not blindly praise my nation, I praised the ideal of a nation.
by Greater Tezdrian » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:30 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:Greater Tezdrian wrote:But, again, the point is that I did not find it funny, nor did Euroslavia. Also, I have no idea whether a fascist regime would end up fine and dandy, but I know that many 3P regimes did. And, I did not blindly praise my nation, I praised the ideal of a nation.
Eh I dont find that ideal worth praising tbh. But whatever floats our boat. I value my personal freedom. You value your.. "ideal of a nation".
by Meryuma » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:31 pm
Greater Tezdrian wrote:Meryuma wrote:
What powers do authorities have over "regular" people to decide those things? Why can't people decide those things for themselves? Also, I don't see why anyone would want to gun someone down in the street, unless they had severe mental issues. Besides, if someone was trying to gun you down in the street, you could fight back, plus try and get them to compensate you for what they did.
If there was no government, there would be no cops. No cops means not enforcing the law. So, people could take out others without any thought of punishment. And, why would someone with money give it to others?
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Greater Tezdrian » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:34 pm
Meryuma wrote:Greater Tezdrian wrote:
If there was no government, there would be no cops. No cops means not enforcing the law. So, people could take out others without any thought of punishment. And, why would someone with money give it to others?
Look up "polycentric law" and "common law". A legal system can be maintained without a gvt.
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 8:34 pm
Meryuma wrote:Greater Tezdrian wrote:
If there was no government, there would be no cops. No cops means not enforcing the law. So, people could take out others without any thought of punishment. And, why would someone with money give it to others?
Look up "polycentric law" and "common law". A legal system can be maintained without a gvt.
by Scientific socks » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:18 pm
Tubbsalot wrote:Scientific socks wrote:Communism ignores one crucial factor. All animals are selfish for their own genetics. they will put themselves first. People will try to cheat the system or get more for themselves in all circumstances. Some wont and the cheaters will take advantage of that.
If you will get paid the same for working and not working why waste your energy with work? It is probably better to spare that energy and attempt to find the best possible mate. Thats far better for the future of your genes then working hard and being too tierd to find a partner of equal quality.
in capatilist if people dont work they may/may not get welfare which offers a lower quality of life and would make it harder to show off to a potential partner thus reducing your mating ability. eg the trophy wife is for the money that work/inheritance provides.
Communism removes a reason for work and thus makes it pointless to work decreasing the quality of society. As I never hear a communist mention the natural selfish behaviour that all animals exhibit within their populace i consider it a flawed ideaology. At least capitlists mention people on welfare, scammers and other cheaters that all societies have.
Bzzt. Genetics select on the level of higher groups as well as individuals. The biological comparison is bogus, and furthermore, it's readily apparent that humans are NOT entirely selfish - see charity.
As social animals, humans are concerned with not just individual welfare but also the welfare of others, especially within their own group; communism still provides rewards to hard workers, such as prestige and other non-monetary rewards; and conversely, slacking off is also punished by social disapproval. Essentially, communism motivates almost as well as capitalism does, though the effect diminishes as the number of participants increase - the socially based reinforcers of communism require that everyone knows everyone else, which is why it's non-viable on large scales.
Incidentally - you might not have heard a communist address those issues, but I'd be willing to bet you haven't heard many communists, period.
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:20 pm
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:20 pm
by New Hampshyre » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:28 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:Well i'm basically a council communist or council marxist. Democratic communism ftw!
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:34 pm
by New Hampshyre » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:46 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:Democracy already is mob rule in my opinion.
by Science-Oriented Scots » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:58 pm
Mercator Terra wrote:Also everything is selfish. Everything you do is for pleasure. Even charity...
by Mercator Terra » Fri Dec 31, 2010 11:00 pm
New Hampshyre wrote:Mercator Terra wrote:Democracy already is mob rule in my opinion.
Today in the US it does have some definite connections to mob rule, since it's results are pressed on everyone, even if they don't want anything to do with the voting. But in the US there are things that make it different from mob complete mob rule like the checks and balances that are built in to the government and the constitutional limits on government action. They aren't quite adequate to do the jobs they were intended to do, but they do offer the minority some definite protections from the majority.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Bovad, Click Ests Vimgalevytopia, Elwher, Ineva, Maximum Imperium Rex, Repreteop, Rio Cana, TescoPepsi, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Uiiop
Advertisement