Because that statement is not definitive.
Advertisement

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:39 pm

by Nort Eurasia » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:39 pm

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:40 pm
Unhealthy2 wrote:The Murtunian Tribes wrote:If it does not require absolute certainty, then how do you claim that God does not exist?
I don't. I claim that it is infinitesimal in probability. Thus, for absolutely any practical measure, it's not true. Strictly speaking, this isn't an absolute proof, but it's as close as one can get to proof without being proof.

by Unhealthy2 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:41 pm
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:So you don't know?

by Nazistisches Reich » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:41 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:Unhealthy2 wrote:
There could be a god that punishes believers and rewards atheists. There could be a god that punishes people for believing in the wrong religion. Plus, most religions aren't just you believe and that's it. Most demand something from you, money, time, etc.
And if we are wrong, are we really losing anything? Is happiness, the belief that there is an afterlife for us, something that convinces us that there's something good, not worth the time/money? It's peace of mind, almost. Insurance, if you will.

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:41 pm

by The Grand World Order » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:42 pm

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:45 pm

by Unhealthy2 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:46 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:Or is it merely perception, and you simply think you're doing it?
this is becoming redundant

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:46 pm
It was an interesting talk.
by The Grand World Order » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:46 pm
Nazistisches Reich wrote:
No its not, because theres religons which deny certain people of having sex yet their bodys urge them and next thing you know their raping little boys. Theres also religons which make you fast for a day even though your body is required to have a certain amount of calories each day. Theres also religons which say its a sin to check out another woman while your in a relationship its considered adultery. theres alot of things that religon does which fucks up your life, its not like you can just worship the god of a certain religon and go okay now Im all set.

by Unhealthy2 » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:46 pm
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:I would hardly say the likliehood of the existence of God compares to the likliehood of the exsitence of your bowl of cereal.

by Nort Eurasia » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:48 pm

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:49 pm
Unhealthy2 wrote:The Grand World Order wrote:Or is it merely perception, and you simply think you're doing it?
this is becoming redundant
Why is it that god is the only thing people seem to demand absolute proof on either way in order to claim knowledge? Nobody demands absolute proof to say that they know Obama is the president. No one demands absolute certainty for claims that Canada exists. Why is this solipsism stuff only ever brought up in the context of god debates?
). However, the same does not apply to God, since no one directly percieves him, or those that do stay very quiet about it.
by The Grand World Order » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:49 pm
Unhealthy2 wrote:The Grand World Order wrote:Or is it merely perception, and you simply think you're doing it?
this is becoming redundant
Why is it that god is the only thing people seem to demand absolute proof on either way in order to claim knowledge? Nobody demands absolute proof to say that they know Obama is the president. No one demands absolute certainty for claims that Canada exists. Why is this solipsism stuff only ever brought up in the context of god debates?

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:50 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:51 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nort Eurasia » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:52 pm

by Zeth Rekia » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:56 pm

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:57 pm

by Nightkill the Emperor » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:58 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nort Eurasia » Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:00 pm

by The Murtunian Tribes » Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:03 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Haganham, Hidrandia, Kenmoria, Kitsuva, Major-Tom, North Evans, Northern Seleucia, Socialist States of Ludistan, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Zurkerx
Advertisement