NATION

PASSWORD

Should Finland join the NATO?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:13 pm

Georgetpwn wrote:Ireland could become a soviet target, after the rest of Europe gets assraped in a world war 3.


What makes you think Europe would be raped by Russia with America, their own standing armies and probably militia?

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Conserative Morality » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:18 pm

Yootopia wrote:Why not -_-

If Sweden could own it, I'm pretty sure anyone could -_-

Once, when it was inferior in weaponry, split up into multiple groups, et cetera.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
North Wiedna
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17759
Founded: Apr 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby North Wiedna » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:21 pm

Western Mercenary Unio wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:But it's already got the Hungarians... ;)


Fun fact: Hungarian and Finnish belong to the same language group.

That would be Ugric.
I am not at all interested in immortality, only in the taste of tea.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:22 pm

EL80DK wrote:
Georgetpwn wrote:Ireland could become a soviet target, after the rest of Europe gets assraped in a world war 3.


What makes you think Europe would be raped by Russia with America, their own standing armies and probably militia?

The Russian troops will launch a suprise attack during beer fest using the Trojan Keg technique.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Non Aligned States
Minister
 
Posts: 3156
Founded: Nov 14, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Non Aligned States » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:24 pm

greed and death wrote:The Russian troops will launch a suprise attack during beer fest using the Trojan Keg technique.


Wouldn't work. You've never seen a thirsty and desperate German at work have you? Much less one who's had his beer supply swapped out for a (likely drunk) Russian commando.

It wouldn't be pretty.

User avatar
Yootopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8410
Founded: Dec 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Yootopia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:26 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Yootopia wrote:Why not -_-

If Sweden could own it, I'm pretty sure anyone could -_-

Once, when it was inferior in weaponry, split up into multiple groups, et cetera.

Sweden is a shitload richer than Finland even today...
End the Modigarchy now.

User avatar
Fighter4u
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: Sep 11, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Fighter4u » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:28 pm

Kryozerkia wrote:
The South Islands wrote:NATO is useless these days. Russia will never be a threat again. War is obsolete. Disband it now. Then Canadians don't have to die for American Imperialism.

It's not entirely the fault of Americans. Our mission would have been a hell of a lot less dangerous if Harper kept it in his pants and allowed the troops to remain in Kabul and the surrounding areas instead of going to Kandahar and the more volatile areas of the region.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_F ... fghanistan

The statistics reveal something interesting. From 2002-2005, we had few casualties which included the friendly fire incident in which the US killed four Canadians, wounding eight others. Only eight were killed in that time period. From 2005 onward, the numbers per year sky rocket. The increase happened because the mission was changed by the Conservatives.


O yes. Hide in Kabul well the Taliban over run the countryside, unleash terror upon the people and have the poppies remain untouched. After staying Kabul until 2010, leave with few deaths and then watch as Kabul gets over ran by Taliban fighters and even more Afgans died.

So yeah we could do what the cowards like France and Germany do and hide in a city or a base. And frankly that is what we did do. You know why we had so few deaths? Because the Vandoos hid in their base and never went outside. I know this because I met a soldier who returned after serving their. He says when they got their they told the Vandoos to get their shit together and do their job. Heck we even had Americans soldiers serving under us.

And frankly I'm proud that Canada could go into the Taliban southern stronghold and bring peace and security to the area. The Afgans people want us their and they are like us because we build schools, hospitals,sewers and let girls go to school. Afgans want to have a better tomorrow and I'm proud Canada has not backed down and instead stepped up and help take part in a better tomorrow.

Sure soldiers died. Thats is sad. But our soldiers signed up for this. They agreed to go to Afghanistan and knew the risks when they signed up to serve. They are proud of what they are doing over their and we are showing to the world that we still got it. To run just because a few soldiers have died is childish and is one of the few things that annoy me about Liberals. This is a war and in war people died. They don't play patty cake.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.


About the U.S invading Canada.
New Manvir wrote:
greed and death wrote:Kill the commies, seize all banking assets.


Well, knowing America's sense of Geography, we'll have you guys marching into the Gulf of Mexico before you realize you've made a mistake.


Mallorea and Riva should resign.

MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:29 pm

Non Aligned States wrote:
greed and death wrote:The Russian troops will launch a suprise attack during beer fest using the Trojan Keg technique.


Wouldn't work. You've never seen a thirsty and desperate German at work have you? Much less one who's had his beer supply swapped out for a (likely drunk) Russian commando.

It wouldn't be pretty.

No the design works much better.
First they use kegs large enough to fit tanks in.
second the keg does have a layer of beer in it that can only go out through the tap, not into the solider compartment.
However the beer has been laced with wine so that any German drinking it will temporary be turned into Frenchmen.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:29 pm

greed and death wrote:
EL80DK wrote:
Georgetpwn wrote:Ireland could become a soviet target, after the rest of Europe gets assraped in a world war 3.


What makes you think Europe would be raped by Russia with America, their own standing armies and probably militia?

The Russian troops will launch a suprise attack during beer fest using the Trojan Keg technique.


Apart from the technique, sounds like Red Storm Rising. And you do realise the only country which has a beer fest is Germany? Ireland has one everyday de facto, as I learnt in Gremanagh. I has cider fest.
Last edited by EL80DK on Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:31 pm

greed and death wrote:
Non Aligned States wrote:
greed and death wrote:The Russian troops will launch a suprise attack during beer fest using the Trojan Keg technique.


Wouldn't work. You've never seen a thirsty and desperate German at work have you? Much less one who's had his beer supply swapped out for a (likely drunk) Russian commando.

It wouldn't be pretty.

No the design works much better.
First they use kegs large enough to fit tanks in.
second the keg does have a layer of beer in it that can only go out through the tap, not into the solider compartment.
However the beer has been laced with wine so that any German drinking it will temporary be turned into Frenchmen.


If you're not English, I'll eat my hat.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:33 pm

EL80DK wrote:
greed and death wrote:
Non Aligned States wrote:
Wouldn't work. You've never seen a thirsty and desperate German at work have you? Much less one who's had his beer supply swapped out for a (likely drunk) Russian commando.

It wouldn't be pretty.

No the design works much better.
First they use kegs large enough to fit tanks in.
second the keg does have a layer of beer in it that can only go out through the tap, not into the solider compartment.
However the beer has been laced with wine so that any German drinking it will temporary be turned into Frenchmen.


If you're not English, I'll eat my hat.

Nope I am American and a Texan at that.
Last edited by Greed and Death on Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
The Phoenix Milita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 666
Founded: Antiquity
Compulsory Consumerist State

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby The Phoenix Milita » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:35 pm

Yootopia wrote:No, because they don't need to, and Finland doesn't really have the kind of professional army needed by the countries in NATO nowadays for their globetrotting missions.

That's the whole point of NATO, that way if Finland is attacked, all the NATO countries can help it. Look at Iceland - no standing army at all and a NATO member.
Last edited by The Phoenix Milita on Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:36 pm

greed and death wrote:
EL80DK wrote:
greed and death wrote:No the design works much better.
First they use kegs large enough to fit tanks in.
second the keg does have a layer of beer in it that can only go out through the tap, not into the solider compartment.
However the beer has been laced with wine so that any German drinking it will temporary be turned into Frenchmen.


If you're not English, I'll eat my hat.

Nope I am American and a Texan at that.


Ah. It's just the norm for me to see Englishmen making cracks about France in WWII so as to forget Napolen and Joan D'Arc.

Nice joke, by the way.

User avatar
Yootopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8410
Founded: Dec 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Yootopia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:37 pm

The Phoenix Milita wrote:
Yootopia wrote:No, because they don't need to, and Finland doesn't really have the kind of professional army needed by the countries in NATO nowadays for their globetrotting missions.

That's the whole point of NATO, that way if Finland is attacked, all the NATO countries can help it. Look at Iceland - no traditional military at all and a NATO member.

Uhu... if you didn't selectively quote what I said though...

NATO is more an instrument of US foreign policy than anything else, and any country that joins which has an army but is really reluctant to send it abroad is just going to look a bit stupid.
End the Modigarchy now.

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:39 pm

Yootopia wrote:
The Phoenix Milita wrote:
Yootopia wrote:No, because they don't need to, and Finland doesn't really have the kind of professional army needed by the countries in NATO nowadays for their globetrotting missions.

That's the whole point of NATO, that way if Finland is attacked, all the NATO countries can help it. Look at Iceland - no traditional military at all and a NATO member.

Uhu... if you didn't selectively quote what I said though...

NATO is more an instrument of US foreign policy than anything else, and any country that joins which has an army but is really reluctant to send it abroad is just going to look a bit stupid.


Seconded.

User avatar
Yootopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8410
Founded: Dec 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Yootopia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:41 pm

EL80DK wrote:Ah. It's just the norm for me to see Englishmen making cracks about France in WWII so as to forget Napolen

Ahem. We beat Napoleon pretty savagely, twice, and he never set foot on British soil...
and Joan D'Arc.

Our monarchy is never particularly British, so eh... it losing its holdings over there is more an issue of sibling rivalry than national calamity.
End the Modigarchy now.

User avatar
The Phoenix Milita
Diplomat
 
Posts: 666
Founded: Antiquity
Compulsory Consumerist State

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby The Phoenix Milita » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:05 pm

Name one instance of nato being used in this way besides current afghan conflict.

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:08 pm

Yootopia wrote:
EL80DK wrote:Ah. It's just the norm for me to see Englishmen making cracks about France in WWII so as to forget Napolen

Ahem. We beat Napoleon pretty savagely, twice, and he never set foot on British soil...
and Joan D'Arc.

Our monarchy is never particularly British, so eh... it losing its holdings over there is more an issue of sibling rivalry than national calamity.


:roll: :roll:

I meant it as in the fashion that no Englishman will achknowledge the fact that Bonaparte conquered most of Europe when cracking up about 'lol France conquered by Germany LOL!'.

User avatar
Non Aligned States
Minister
 
Posts: 3156
Founded: Nov 14, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Non Aligned States » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:13 pm

greed and death wrote:No the design works much better.
First they use kegs large enough to fit tanks in.
second the keg does have a layer of beer in it that can only go out through the tap, not into the solider compartment.
However the beer has been laced with wine so that any German drinking it will temporary be turned into Frenchmen.


The bigger the keg, the thirstier the German, and the bigger the crowd. The layer would be drained dry by the first 10 steins. You'd only turn a handful into Frenchmen, the rest would be still 100% German, and more importantly, 100% mob of beer deprived Germans. Your tanks would be ripped apart.
Last edited by Non Aligned States on Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:15 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Mariahamn
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 53
Founded: Mar 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Mariahamn » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:31 pm

Western Mercenary Unio wrote:*Mutisee jotakin kuinka Ahvenanmaa ei ole osa Suomea.* Well, I actually don't know why people avoid those subjects and I've never avoided them.

I'm not entirely certain about what you wrote. I do understand "Ahvenanmaa ei ole osa Suomea" and that's the subject for an entirely different thread, but to give you my opinion in a nutshell, it is now. :p

Jag har aldrig förstått den språkliga frågran i finland. Det finns verkligen ingen skillnad mellan "riktiga" finnar och finlandssvenskar utom ens modersmål.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:34 pm

Non Aligned States wrote:
greed and death wrote:No the design works much better.
First they use kegs large enough to fit tanks in.
second the keg does have a layer of beer in it that can only go out through the tap, not into the solider compartment.
However the beer has been laced with wine so that any German drinking it will temporary be turned into Frenchmen.


The bigger the keg, the thirstier the German, and the bigger the crowd. The layer would be drained dry by the first 10 steins. You'd only turn a handful into Frenchmen, the rest would be still 100% German, and more importantly, 100% mob of beer deprived Germans. Your tanks would be ripped apart.

But the first to drink would be the mayor and other leaders of the city. who would surrender before the beer thirsty Germans had a change to frenzy. Also the Russians will use WMD's if all else fails and send their strategic bombers to drop Bud light on all the breweries in Germany, if resistance continues.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby New Manvir » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:07 pm

I don't care, if they want to. Just remember BYOB.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
The South Islands
Diplomat
 
Posts: 983
Founded: Apr 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby The South Islands » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:27 pm

Kryozerkia wrote:
The South Islands wrote:NATO is useless these days. Russia will never be a threat again. War is obsolete. Disband it now. Then Canadians don't have to die for American Imperialism.

It's not entirely the fault of Americans. Our mission would have been a hell of a lot less dangerous if Harper kept it in his pants and allowed the troops to remain in Kabul and the surrounding areas instead of going to Kandahar and the more volatile areas of the region.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_F ... fghanistan

The statistics reveal something interesting. From 2002-2005, we had few casualties which included the friendly fire incident in which the US killed four Canadians, wounding eight others. Only eight were killed in that time period. From 2005 onward, the numbers per year sky rocket. The increase happened because the mission was changed by the Conservatives.


They point is they never should have been there in the first place.

NATO was an anti-soviet alliance bent on preventing Communist takeover etc etc. And perhaps preventing large scale war.

That is obsolete now. Industrialized nations with the capability to fund large militaries are far to economically interdependant on each other to risk large scale war again. Therefore, the entire rationale behind NATO is no longer applicable. It exists now only to give an international face to American imperialist dreams.

End NATO now. Let American blood be shed for American dreams of conquest. Let not other nations be drawn in to the US's imperial ambitions.
IL Ruffino: The wind flows / The hair on TSI's ass glides as if airborn / Smell the freshly cut grass
Gravlen: If I can blame you? Of course I can! I mean, you're like a walking cathalyst for homosexuality, driving otherwise straight men to write haikus about your ass hair...

So it's a wonder that your presence alone in any thread don't derail them and lead to debates about world leaders and homoerotic desires.


Sarkhaan: You. Put your pants back on.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Neu Leonstein » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:31 pm

Fighter4u wrote:So yeah we could do what the cowards like France and Germany do and hide in a city or a base.

To be fair, somewhat under the cover of the news media not caring, things are changing, albeit slowly.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/ger ... 46,00.html
http://www.spiegel.de/international/ger ... 17,00.html

And cowards is kinda inappropriate a word to use too. It's not like the troops particularly like the rules being imposed on them, it's the politicians and big sections of the public who are responsible.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Maurepas » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:36 pm

If Finland wants to, I would say we'll take whatever we can get...Besides, when the Russians come knockin, itd be nice to have someone who's country has experience kicking their ass, :p

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Danielsk, Ifreann, Neo-Broff, Phoeniae, Risottia, The Huskar Social Union, The Lone Alliance, Tungstan, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads