NATION

PASSWORD

Should Finland join the NATO?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Western Mercenary Unio
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1088
Founded: Jun 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Western Mercenary Unio » Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:28 am

Mariahamn wrote:I'm not entirely certain about what you wrote. I do understand "Ahvenanmaa ei ole osa Suomea" and that's the subject for an entirely different thread, but to give you my opinion in a nutshell, it is now. :p

Jag har aldrig förstått den språkliga frågran i finland. Det finns verkligen ingen skillnad mellan "riktiga" finnar och finlandssvenskar utom ens modersmål.


En minä oikeasti ajattele sillä tavalla. Se oli vitsi, ehkä huono vitsi mutta vitsi kuitenkin.
You didn't tell me there was going to be math-Mike Krahulik AKA Gabe, after finding out he had to do math in Dungeons & Dragons, also my reaction finding out that I had to do math in most of the storefronts.
Political Compass: -4.25, -6.26
Disclaimer: I might be totally wrong, due to the fact that I probably know jackshit about the subject.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55307
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Risottia » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:42 am

City of Norfolk wrote:
Risottia wrote:
City of Norfolk wrote: The U.S. isn't an Imperialist power since we have fought imperial nations since our founding.


:rofl:

Quite a faulty logic there.

1.It could just be that the US wanted to take the place of those empires it was fighting. Hint: Spanish Empire, USA, Cuba, Philippines. Does that ring a bell?
2.Go tell that "the US isn't an imperialist power" to Iraqis.

:roll:

Please, that was in the late 1800's early 1900's, they teach you that crap in Middle School for Christ sake.

Has it happened OR not? Because it was YOU the one who was making claims like "since our funding we did that hence...". So late 1800 is ok as a counterexample.

I'll tell that to any Iraqi, who gave them the right to choose their government after decades of death and torture under Saddam?

And who gave them Saddam?
A hint:
Image
guess what country a certain Mr.Reagan was president of and a certain Mr.Rumsfeld was "special envoy for the ME" for.

Who protected them against hard line radical muslims who would kill ANYONE who got in their way?

Were there ANY radical muslims bombing people in Iraq BEFORE the 2003 invasion? No. So their presence is a byproduct of that invasion. Should the Iraqis thank the US because they're trying to lessen a bit the mess they've made?

If you live in the U.S. you sir, should be damned proud that you have the right to say what you say.

Luckily I don't live on that side of the pond. And I have the right to say what I say nevertheless.
.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21482
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Bears Armed » Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:07 am

EL80DK wrote:Ah. It's just the norm for me to see Englishmen making cracks about France in WWII so as to forget Napolen and Joan D'Arc.

Why should we feel any need to forget Napoleon? We (with help from some other countries, admittedly) beat Napoleon...
Last edited by Bears Armed on Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
EL80DK
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Jul 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby EL80DK » Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:50 am

Bears Armed wrote:
EL80DK wrote:Ah. It's just the norm for me to see Englishmen making cracks about France in WWII so as to forget Napolen and Joan D'Arc.

Why should we feel any need to forget Napoleon? We (with help from some other countries, admittedly) beat Napoleon...


You shouldn't forget about you lot and others kicking Bonaparte arse, but it is annoying to me that whenever a bunch of Englishmen start cracking up about WWII France and I remind them of Bonaparte, they virtually put their hands over theirs ears and shout either 'we owned you Irish' or some jingoistic bullshit. They never recognise that Bonaparte kicked a hefty amount of European arse, just the one instance in WWII when France surrendered to what is admittingly the then-huge Nazi armies and the Nazi asskicking of Europe, only being stopped at Stalingrad, D-Day and several other important events in World War II.

Of course, it is entertaining whenever I mention 'Roman legions', buy a cider and walk away. :p

User avatar
Mirkana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1971
Founded: Oct 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Mirkana » Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:09 am

Jakra wrote:Honestly, I believe someday Russia will probably join NATO.


That would be a great thing. I would love to see the day when American and Russian soldiers fight side by side.
Impeach Ramses, Legalize Monotheism, Slavery is Theft, MOSES 1400 BCE

Pro: Democracy, Egalitarianism, Judaism, Separation of Church and State, Israel, Arab Spring, Gay Rights, Welfare, Universal Healthcare, Regulated Capitalism, Scientific Rationalism, Constitutional Monarchy
Against: Dictatorships, Racism, Nazism, Theocracy, Anti-Semitism, Sexism, Homophobia, Imperialism, Creationism, Genocide, Slavery

Alien Space Bats wrote:
Rokartian States wrote:There sure is a lot of damning and fucking going around in here. :lol:

It's the international nature of the board.

In some places, it's Saturday night; in other places, Sunday morning.


Blazedtown wrote:Because every decision ever is a secret conspiracy to keep the brothers down.

User avatar
Fighter4u
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: Sep 11, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Fighter4u » Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:19 pm

Neu Leonstein wrote:
Fighter4u wrote:So yeah we could do what the cowards like France and Germany do and hide in a city or a base.

To be fair, somewhat under the cover of the news media not caring, things are changing, albeit slowly.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/ger ... 46,00.html
http://www.spiegel.de/international/ger ... 17,00.html

And cowards is kinda inappropriate a word to use too. It's not like the troops particularly like the rules being imposed on them, it's the politicians and big sections of the public who are responsible.


Well its good to see you guys joining in the fight. Just never forget this war is for a good cause. Its not over resources,control of a region or to kill a ethic group but to destroy a group of people who have oppress the Afgans people for far too long. A safer Afghanistan is a safer Middle East.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.


About the U.S invading Canada.
New Manvir wrote:
greed and death wrote:Kill the commies, seize all banking assets.


Well, knowing America's sense of Geography, we'll have you guys marching into the Gulf of Mexico before you realize you've made a mistake.


Mallorea and Riva should resign.

MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Neu Leonstein » Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:33 pm

Fighter4u wrote:Well its good to see you guys joining in the fight. Just never forget this war is for a good cause. Its not over resources,control of a region or to kill a ethic group but to destroy a group of people who have oppress the Afgans people for far too long. A safer Afghanistan is a safer Middle East.

I have a more nuanced stance on this, for if that was our motivation, there are other places we should be probably more pressingly. I'm not a supporter of the conflict there because I support the violent introduction of democracy in principle*, but because I consider it part of a two-pronged approach to sort out Pakistan.

*not that I don't, just, as I said, North Korea probably deserves it more than Afghanistan..
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Fighter4u
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 434
Founded: Sep 11, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Should Finland join the NATO?

Postby Fighter4u » Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:27 pm

Neu Leonstein wrote:
Fighter4u wrote:Well its good to see you guys joining in the fight. Just never forget this war is for a good cause. Its not over resources,control of a region or to kill a ethic group but to destroy a group of people who have oppress the Afgans people for far too long. A safer Afghanistan is a safer Middle East.

I have a more nuanced stance on this, for if that was our motivation, there are other places we should be probably more pressingly. I'm not a supporter of the conflict there because I support the violent introduction of democracy in principle*, but because I consider it part of a two-pronged approach to sort out Pakistan.

*not that I don't, just, as I said, North Korea probably deserves it more than Afghanistan..


O, I know that its all about sorting out Pakistan. I'm just saying were also doing a hell of a lot of good here also.
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.


About the U.S invading Canada.
New Manvir wrote:
greed and death wrote:Kill the commies, seize all banking assets.


Well, knowing America's sense of Geography, we'll have you guys marching into the Gulf of Mexico before you realize you've made a mistake.


Mallorea and Riva should resign.

MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

User avatar
Jerenia
Envoy
 
Posts: 342
Founded: Aug 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Jerenia » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:16 am

Yootopia wrote:Sweden is a shitload richer than Finland even today...


Check your facts:
Sweden's GDP (nominal) per capita is $52,180 and Finland's is $51,588. If you think a couple of hundreds of dollars is a 'shitload', then be my guest, but I disagree...

User avatar
The Araucania
Diplomat
 
Posts: 694
Founded: Dec 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Araucania » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:21 am

NO!
FOR A CELTIC UNITY
CHRISTIAN AND PROUD
LUTHERAN
NatSit 1| NatSit 2|NatSit 3|NatSIt 4|NatSit 5|NatSit 6|NatSit 7|
DEPENDENCES
New Cork and Helsinsk, Araucanian Antartica

ARGENTINA

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:23 am

No, It is nice to have a buffer between NATO and Russia.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Andaluciae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5766
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Andaluciae » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:42 am

Jerenia wrote:
Yootopia wrote:Sweden is a shitload richer than Finland even today...


Check your facts:
Sweden's GDP (nominal) per capita is $52,180 and Finland's is $51,588. If you think a couple of hundreds of dollars is a 'shitload', then be my guest, but I disagree...


Why, praytell, did you wake the zombie?
FreeAgency wrote:Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin...

User avatar
Reich-Swehr
Secretary
 
Posts: 37
Founded: Jan 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Reich-Swehr » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:51 am

Fighter4u wrote:
Neu Leonstein wrote:
Fighter4u wrote:Well its good to see you guys joining in the fight. Just never forget this war is for a good cause. Its not over resources,control of a region or to kill a ethic group but to destroy a group of people who have oppress the Afgans people for far too long. A safer Afghanistan is a safer Middle East.

I have a more nuanced stance on this, for if that was our motivation, there are other places we should be probably more pressingly. I'm not a supporter of the conflict there because I support the violent introduction of democracy in principle*, but because I consider it part of a two-pronged approach to sort out Pakistan.

*not that I don't, just, as I said, North Korea probably deserves it more than Afghanistan..


O, I know that its all about sorting out Pakistan. I'm just saying were also doing a hell of a lot of good here also.


the UK or Canada would likely never touch Pakistan, it is a Commonwealth Realm.
Concerning Canadian troops in Southern Afghanistan, in Helmand and stuff, it is very much welcomed, the British Army are proud to serve alongside the Canadians.
Last edited by Reich-Swehr on Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Philimbesi
Minister
 
Posts: 2453
Founded: Jun 07, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Philimbesi » Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:03 am

ZOMBIE!!! Pass me the Jugger-nog!
The Unified States Of Philimbesi
The Honorable Josiah Bartlett - President

Ideological Bulwark #235

User avatar
Disco Tetris
Diplomat
 
Posts: 802
Founded: Jan 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Disco Tetris » Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:46 am

greed and death wrote:No, It is nice to have a buffer between NATO and Russia.

Well, we already admitted the Baltic States.

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:23 am

Reich-Swehr wrote:
Fighter4u wrote:
Neu Leonstein wrote:
Fighter4u wrote:Well its good to see you guys joining in the fight. Just never forget this war is for a good cause. Its not over resources,control of a region or to kill a ethic group but to destroy a group of people who have oppress the Afgans people for far too long. A safer Afghanistan is a safer Middle East.

I have a more nuanced stance on this, for if that was our motivation, there are other places we should be probably more pressingly. I'm not a supporter of the conflict there because I support the violent introduction of democracy in principle*, but because I consider it part of a two-pronged approach to sort out Pakistan.

*not that I don't, just, as I said, North Korea probably deserves it more than Afghanistan..


O, I know that its all about sorting out Pakistan. I'm just saying were also doing a hell of a lot of good here also.


the UK or Canada would likely never touch Pakistan, it is a Commonwealth Realm.

Concerning Canadian troops in Southern Afghanistan, in Helmand and stuff, it is very much welcomed, the British Army are proud to serve alongside the Canadians.


No it's not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_Realm

EDIT: My bad. They were kicked out, but we let them back in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonweal ... Suspension
Last edited by New Manvir on Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
The Baltic Alliance
Envoy
 
Posts: 303
Founded: Oct 19, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Baltic Alliance » Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:28 am

Why would anybody want Finland to join anything?
Nordic Lands
To those that flee comes neither power nor glory. (Homer)
"Come on you sons of bitches! Do you want to live forever?"
Gunnery Sergeant Dan Daly, 4 june 1918 .

User avatar
The Southern Dictators
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1364
Founded: Nov 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Southern Dictators » Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:31 am

No, Finland should not join NATO
PT Factbook Under ConstructionPMT Factbook Under Heavy ConstructionFT Factbook Under Heavy Construction

GENERATION 28: The first time you see this, copy it into your signature on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment

Volnotova wrote:Oh ffs, if there is one thing I can't stand it is this plethora of weeping and depressed people in this thread that will not hesitate to use every opportunity available to exlcaim how something like this made them lose (all) faith in humanity(including themselves).

:palm: x 3

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, East Leaf Republic, Google [Bot], Halal lands, Juristonia, Shrillland, The Apollonian Systems

Advertisement

Remove ads