by Western Mercenary Unio » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:04 am
by Yootopia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:06 am
by Longhaul » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:06 am
Western Mercenary Unio wrote:Right now, most are against it
by Georgetpwn » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:07 am
by Western Mercenary Unio » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:08 am
Longhaul wrote:I'd say that it should be up to the Finns.Western Mercenary Unio wrote:Right now, most are against it
So no, then.
Georgetpwn wrote:Finland should join NATO, mainly for protection from the ruskies.
by Yootopia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:09 am
Georgetpwn wrote:Finland should join NATO, mainly for protection from the ruskies.
by Buffett and Colbert » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:10 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
by Western Mercenary Unio » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:11 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:...
There really is no point. I don't think Finland is going to get involved in some major war any time soon.
by Yootopia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:12 am
Western Mercenary Unio wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:...
There really is no point. I don't think Finland is going to get involved in some major war any time soon.
The only reason for us to do so would be protection from a possible war with Russia. Which is unlikely.
by Kryozerkia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:12 am
by United Russian State » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:13 am
by The Tofu Islands » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:14 am
Yootopia wrote:If you join NATO, the Russians will drop a nuke on Helsinki along with the rest of the world in case of a war. If you get invaded outside of NATO, some of your country might be left
by The Atlantian islands » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:17 am
by Grays Harbor » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:21 am
United Russian State wrote:No! NATO should disband.
by United Russian State » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:28 am
Grays Harbor wrote:United Russian State wrote:No! NATO should disband.
why should NATO disband? because the warsaw pact fell apart and the "members" rushed to join with western europe after its collapse?
as for the OP, while I am firmly in favor of NATO's continued existance, it may not be what is best for Finland. Sweden, Austria and Swizterland have done well enough without being members, so can Finland.
by Bears Armed » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:35 am
But now there is "a new cold war going on" disbanding it wouldn't be a sensible thing for the members to do, it would just seem a show of weakness... The right time for NATO to disband was after the Warsaw Pact did so but before this "new cold war" situation arose.United Russian State wrote:Until it is gone there is a new cold war going on.p
by Galloism » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:35 am
Bears Armed wrote:But now there is "a new cold war going on" disbanding it wouldn't be a sensible thing for the members to do, it would just seem a show of weakness... The right time for NATO to disband was after the Warsaw Pact did so but before this "new cold war" situation arose.United Russian State wrote:Until it is gone there is a new cold war going on.p
by Hydesland » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:36 am
by Jakra » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:38 am
Galloism wrote:Bears Armed wrote:But now there is "a new cold war going on" disbanding it wouldn't be a sensible thing for the members to do, it would just seem a show of weakness... The right time for NATO to disband was after the Warsaw Pact did so but before this "new cold war" situation arose.United Russian State wrote:Until it is gone there is a new cold war going on.p
I somehow missed that in the news.
When did this "New Cold War" start?
by Glorious Freedonia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:45 am
by United Russian State » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:45 am
Galloism wrote:Bears Armed wrote:But now there is "a new cold war going on" disbanding it wouldn't be a sensible thing for the members to do, it would just seem a show of weakness... The right time for NATO to disband was after the Warsaw Pact did so but before this "new cold war" situation arose.United Russian State wrote:Until it is gone there is a new cold war going on.p
I somehow missed that in the news.
When did this "New Cold War" start?
by Bears Armed » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:47 am
Galloism wrote:Bears Armed wrote:But now there is "a new cold war going on" disbanding it wouldn't be a sensible thing for the members to do, it would just seem a show of weakness... The right time for NATO to disband was after the Warsaw Pact did so but before this "new cold war" situation arose.United Russian State wrote:Until it is gone there is a new cold war going on.p
I somehow missed that in the news.
When did this "New Cold War" start?
by Farnhamia » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:47 am
Hydesland wrote:Would NATO notice if it joined? /jk
by Bears Armed » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:49 am
Farnhamia wrote:Hydesland wrote:Would NATO notice if it joined? /jk
Yes, because all of a sudden there would be all these people with unpronounceable names showing up for meetings.
by Greed and Death » Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:52 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Burnt Calculators, Deblar, Dumb Ideologies, Lemueria, Nyoskova, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Solstice Isle, Statesburg, Welskerland, Yursea
Advertisement