NATION

PASSWORD

Elect a Roman Emperor President of NSG - The Result

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of these run-off vote candidates should be elected Roman Emperor President of NSG?

Poll ended at Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:10 am

Augustus
72
64%
Constantine I (aka 'the Great')
41
36%
 
Total votes : 113

User avatar
Laos Refugees
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1694
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Laos Refugees » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:01 am

Claudius- " Better Farmland, Less Taxes, More Aquaducts, and Britannica will join our Glorious Empire. All you have to do, is vote FOR Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus as your Roman Emperor President. "



I got a better picture, first one was from Wikipedia, this one is more lifelike
Last edited by Laos Refugees on Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Belschaft
Minister
 
Posts: 2409
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:43 am

Arch, what's your position on Gothic Kings/Emperors?
You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of.
You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30632
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:45 am

Belschaft wrote:Arch, what's your position on Gothic Kings/Emperors?


Are you trying to nominate Theodoric the Great? He never claimed the Imperial title, and was never recognised as Emperor. As no barbarian was raised to the purple in the classical period, it strikes me as a rather moot point; even the powerful ones felt safer manipulating a puppet before the fall of the West, and after the fall of the West, none of them claimed the Imperial title until Charlemagne.
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Unilisia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12053
Founded: May 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unilisia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:49 am

Viva Caligula !
I am the mighty Uni.

Tiami wrote:I bow before the mighty Uni.

Lackadaisical2 wrote:If it shocked Uni, I know I don't want to read it.
You win.

Kylarnatia wrote:Steep hill + wheelchair + my lap - I think we know where that goes ;)

Katganistan wrote:That is fucking stupid.

L Ron Cupboard wrote:He appears to be propelling himself out of the flames with explosive diarrhea while his mother does jazz hands.

Mike the Progressive wrote:Because women are gods, men are pigs, and we, the males, deserve to all be castrated.

Neo Arcad wrote:Uni doesn't sleep. She waits.

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Collector: "Why are these coins all sticky?"

User avatar
Belschaft
Minister
 
Posts: 2409
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:50 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Belschaft wrote:Arch, what's your position on Gothic Kings/Emperors?


Are you trying to nominate Theodoric the Great? He never claimed the Imperial title, and was never recognised as Emperor. As no barbarian was raised to the purple in the classical period, it strikes me as a rather moot point; even the powerful ones felt safer manipulating a puppet.

Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great :) He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.

If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?
You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of.
You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:52 am

Belschaft wrote:Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great :) He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.

If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?

The OP states that to qualify, the emperor most have ruled before the end of yhe Classical period.
Last edited by Tagmatium on Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Belschaft
Minister
 
Posts: 2409
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:54 am

Tagmatium wrote:
Belschaft wrote:Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great :) He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.

If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?

The OP states that to qualify, the emperor most have ruled before the end of yhe Classical period.

Define antiquity. Some might argue that Phocas is too early a cut of.
You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of.
You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:02 am

Belschaft wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:The OP states that to qualify, the emperor most have ruled before the end of yhe Classical period.

Define antiquity. Some might argue that Phocas is too early a cut of.

I'd be pushed, myself, to argue that Phocas is too early a cut off. I'm getting rusty on the Byzantine Empire, but I can't see anything particularly special about his rule to make him the end point, other than he was overthrown by Heraclius, who did see more of a break from the "Classical Period" when he got rid of Latin from the court in favour of Greek.

Amongst other things.

However, Charlemagne is definately out of that period. He comfortably sits within the Early Middle Ages, and I see no real reason to include him in the list of Roman Emperors. Especially since the Byzantine Empire has a far better claim to the "Roman" title in this case than Charlemagne does, bar that the Pope crowned Charlemagne, which just ricochets us down an entirely different route of argument.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30632
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:02 am

Belschaft wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
Are you trying to nominate Theodoric the Great? He never claimed the Imperial title, and was never recognised as Emperor. As no barbarian was raised to the purple in the classical period, it strikes me as a rather moot point; even the powerful ones felt safer manipulating a puppet.

Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great :) He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.

If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?


Sorry - Theodoric doesn't count for the reasons already outlined. And remember that part of his authority derived from being the legitimately appointed viceroy of the Eastern Emperor Zeno (even if that authority was purely nominal in practice).

Charlemagne is definitely too late - our cut off is the death of Phocas (610 AD), following the established - though not universally accepted - precedent that the East Roman Empire becomes 'Byzantine' with the accession of Heraclius, thanks to the transformations brought about by the promotion of Greek as the sole official language of the Empire, the Persian and Arab wars, the transformation of the last classical imperial army units, and the establishment of the Themata.

Phocas was also the last emperor to build a monument in the original Forum in Rome - google 'column of Phocas' - so marks as good an ending point as any.

User avatar
Polska rzczpolspolita
Minister
 
Posts: 2387
Founded: Dec 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Polska rzczpolspolita » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:10 am

Trajan, definitely.
Image
Vote Trajan for a Plebian Emperor under a larger Empire!
(OOC: I can imagine this turning into a good RP
Last edited by Polska rzczpolspolita on Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Both Nations

User avatar
Vonners
Senator
 
Posts: 4525
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Vonners » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:15 am

Commodus - not only for cheap toilet jokes but also for degrading all that is noble about the throne...or in terms of NSG...degradation, laziness and greed...you can't get better than that!
Beer - the other white meat

User avatar
Lizardiar
Minister
 
Posts: 3171
Founded: May 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lizardiar » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:18 am

Image
Vote Safety, Vote security, Vote Hadrian
In all corners of the globe, the free people's slogan is this:
Speak to Fascists in the language of fire! With words of bullets! With sharp wit of bayonets!



Economic Left/Right: 4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55297
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:27 am

Risottia wrote:OCTAVIANVS AVGVSTVS
VT MARMOREAM RELINQVERE QVAM LATERICIAM ACCEPIT
ELIGETE VIRVM QVEM IPSE CAESAR FILIVM SVVM NOMINAVIT


By the way: in IPA it would sound as:

okta'wjanus aw'gustus
ut mar'morɛã: re'liŋkwere kwã: late'rikjã: a'k:ɛpit
eli'gete 'wirũ: kwẽ: 'ipse 'kaesar 'filiũ: 'suũ: nomi'nawit

Yay for classical pronunciation!
.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55297
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:29 am

Lizardiar wrote:
Image

Vote Safety, Vote security, Vote Hadrian

Vallum Hadriani is just a case of "no true Scotsman" again. ;)


ModEdit: See OP instructions on spoilers for campaign posters in quotes.

RisEdit: sorry, mate; I forgot that :oops:
Last edited by Risottia on Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:08 am, edited 3 times in total.
.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30632
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:50 am

Didius Julianus has a new campaign poster....

Image

Points to anyone who knows what the campaign slogan refers to.
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:59 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:18 am

The Archregimancy wrote:Points to anyone who knows what the campaign slogan refers to.

His last words.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30632
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:25 am

Tagmatium wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:Points to anyone who knows what the campaign slogan refers to.

His last words.


<shakes fist at archaeology student>

Well done. According to Cassius Dio, Didius Julianus' last words prior to his execution (on the orders of the Senate, once it was clear Severus was going to defeat Julianus without much of an effort) were "But what evil have I done? Whom have I killed?"

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42056
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:28 am

Tagmatium wrote:His last words.


Isn't that leaving it a bit late to come up with your campaign slogan?

User avatar
Belschaft
Minister
 
Posts: 2409
Founded: Mar 19, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:29 am

The Archregimancy wrote:
Belschaft wrote:Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great :) He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.

If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?


Sorry - Theodoric doesn't count for the reasons already outlined. And remember that part of his authority derived from being the legitimately appointed viceroy of the Eastern Emperor Zeno (even if that authority was purely nominal in practice).

Charlemagne is definitely too late - our cut off is the death of Phocas (610 AD), following the established - though not universally accepted - precedent that the East Roman Empire becomes 'Byzantine' with the accession of Heraclius, thanks to the transformations brought about by the promotion of Greek as the sole official language of the Empire, the Persian and Arab wars, the transformation of the last classical imperial army units, and the establishment of the Themata.

Phocas was also the last emperor to build a monument in the original Forum in Rome - google 'column of Phocas' - so marks as good an ending point as any.

Fair enough. Your thread, your rules. I've successfully argued that the Treaty of Verdun is the start of the middle ages before though, and I quite like viewing Frankia as a transitional period neither quite in the Ancient world or the medieval.
You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of.
You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life.

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:29 am

The Archregimancy wrote:<shakes fist at archaeology student>

Well done. According to Cassius Dio, Didius Julianus' last words prior to his execution (on the orders of the Senate, once it was clear Severus was going to defeat Julianus without much of an effort) were "But what evil have I done? Whom have I killed?"

Archaeology graduate :P

I'm not much of a Classicist myself, but I occasionally pick up things like this.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Nekronia
Senator
 
Posts: 4528
Founded: Dec 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Nekronia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:33 am

Vote for Nero!

He'll keep the place ordered!

He'll clean up the streets!

If you don't vote for him, he'll have you tortured and executed!

GO NERO! :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow:
The Templar High Council wrote:The number of times Nek makes sense is grossly outnumbered by the times he doesn't.
IC Info: TL;DR verson of Nekronia: Authoritarian government with elements of the USSR and national socialism. Everyone works for the government, and buys from the government, obsoleting taxes as the money does not leave the country, save for government buying of items of foreign nations. Military is advanced but unconventional, focusing on infantry and psychological warfare. Primary method of national income is export of armaments and other war-related items.

OOC Info: I am a male and an atheist.
Lithianity's Knight of Hilarity and Jackie-***ery

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30632
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:35 am

Tagmatium wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:<shakes fist at archaeology student>

Well done. According to Cassius Dio, Didius Julianus' last words prior to his execution (on the orders of the Senate, once it was clear Severus was going to defeat Julianus without much of an effort) were "But what evil have I done? Whom have I killed?"

Archaeology graduate :P


And didn't you just pick the perfect time to try and enter the archaeology job market?

<depressed sigh>

So, applied for an MA yet to delay the inevitable? ;)

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:43 am

The Archregimancy wrote:And didn't you just pick the perfect time to try and enter the archaeology job market?

<depressed sigh>

So, applied for an MA yet to delay the inevitable? ;)

To be fair, any time within the last three or so years wouldn't have been ideal. I'd have to have been born five years before I was to have been able to get a job within archaeology, and the likelihood would've meant that I'd have also been amongst the first to be laid off.

*shrug*

I'm really looking at a Medieval Archaeology masters' at Reading. I'm interested in the Baltic, and a project looking into the ecological impact of the Northern Crusades is starting. I might be able to attach myself to it. I really need to look at funding for it, as I think that'll be the only stumbling block to me doing a Masters'.

Annoyingly, my father hinted that he'd have helped with Masters' funding on my graduation day. Bit too late by then.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30632
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:53 am

Tagmatium wrote:
To be fair, any time within the last three or so years wouldn't have been ideal. I'd have to have been born five years before I was to have been able to get a job within archaeology, and the likelihood would've meant that I'd have also been amongst the first to be laid off.

*shrug*

I'm really looking at a Medieval Archaeology masters' at Reading. I'm interested in the Baltic, and a project looking into the ecological impact of the Northern Crusades is starting. I might be able to attach myself to it. I really need to look at funding for it, as I think that'll be the only stumbling block to me doing a Masters'.

Annoyingly, my father hinted that he'd have helped with Masters' funding on my graduation day. Bit too late by then.


The financial crash only really started to bite at the big commercial units - like Oxford and Wessex - in late 2008 as big projects already underway managed to keep them ticking over until then. I can pinpoint more or less the precise moment it started to bite at OA around then as I was helping with recruitment of finds and environmental staff at one of their UK offices, only to be told that for all the time and recruitment and interview paperwork that I'd helped with, they weren't going to actually hire any of the people they'd shortlisted and interviewed as the financial situation had changed drastically between advertising the position and interviewing the candidates.

Painful personal experience demonstrates that it started to bite at universities in late summer 2010.

Anyway, this private conversation threatens to turn into a thread derail, so let's leave it for the time being. I'm genuinely pleased to hear that you do have an MA lined up; it's becoming increasingly hard to achieve anything in archaeology without one.

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:04 am

Hey that one guy who got killed in the Gladiator, because you know, Hollywood would never lie to me! :roll:

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andavarast, Atrito, Boris Johnson MP, El Lazaro, Elwher, HISPIDA, Kostane, Minoa, New Heldervinia, Partybus, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Rusozak, Shearoa, Simonia, Tarsonis, The Huskar Social Union, The Lone Alliance, Torkeland, Uiiop, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads