I got a better picture, first one was from Wikipedia, this one is more lifelike
Advertisement
by Laos Refugees » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:01 am
by Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:43 am
by The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:45 am
Belschaft wrote:Arch, what's your position on Gothic Kings/Emperors?
by Unilisia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:49 am
Tiami wrote:I bow before the mighty Uni.
Lackadaisical2 wrote:If it shocked Uni, I know I don't want to read it.
You win.
Kylarnatia wrote:Steep hill + wheelchair + my lap - I think we know where that goes ;)
Katganistan wrote:That is fucking stupid.
L Ron Cupboard wrote:He appears to be propelling himself out of the flames with explosive diarrhea while his mother does jazz hands.
Mike the Progressive wrote:Because women are gods, men are pigs, and we, the males, deserve to all be castrated.
Neo Arcad wrote:Uni doesn't sleep. She waits.
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Collector: "Why are these coins all sticky?"
by Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:50 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Belschaft wrote:Arch, what's your position on Gothic Kings/Emperors?
Are you trying to nominate Theodoric the Great? He never claimed the Imperial title, and was never recognised as Emperor. As no barbarian was raised to the purple in the classical period, it strikes me as a rather moot point; even the powerful ones felt safer manipulating a puppet.
by Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:52 am
Belschaft wrote:Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.
If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:54 am
Tagmatium wrote:Belschaft wrote:Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.
If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?
The OP states that to qualify, the emperor most have ruled before the end of yhe Classical period.
by Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:02 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:02 am
Belschaft wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
Are you trying to nominate Theodoric the Great? He never claimed the Imperial title, and was never recognised as Emperor. As no barbarian was raised to the purple in the classical period, it strikes me as a rather moot point; even the powerful ones felt safer manipulating a puppet.
Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.
If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?
by Polska rzczpolspolita » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:10 am
by Vonners » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:15 am
by Lizardiar » Tue Dec 14, 2010 7:18 am
by Risottia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:27 am
Risottia wrote:OCTAVIANVS AVGVSTVS
VT MARMOREAM RELINQVERE QVAM LATERICIAM ACCEPIT
ELIGETE VIRVM QVEM IPSE CAESAR FILIVM SVVM NOMINAVIT
by Risottia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:29 am
by The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:50 am
by Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:18 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Points to anyone who knows what the campaign slogan refers to.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:25 am
by Fartsniffage » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:28 am
Tagmatium wrote:His last words.
by Belschaft » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:29 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Belschaft wrote:Yes, I was considering nominating Theodoric the Great He was the de-facto Western Emperor after all.
If the Imperial title is what matters, does that mean that Charlemagne is allowed then?
Sorry - Theodoric doesn't count for the reasons already outlined. And remember that part of his authority derived from being the legitimately appointed viceroy of the Eastern Emperor Zeno (even if that authority was purely nominal in practice).
Charlemagne is definitely too late - our cut off is the death of Phocas (610 AD), following the established - though not universally accepted - precedent that the East Roman Empire becomes 'Byzantine' with the accession of Heraclius, thanks to the transformations brought about by the promotion of Greek as the sole official language of the Empire, the Persian and Arab wars, the transformation of the last classical imperial army units, and the establishment of the Themata.
Phocas was also the last emperor to build a monument in the original Forum in Rome - google 'column of Phocas' - so marks as good an ending point as any.
by Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:29 am
The Archregimancy wrote:<shakes fist at archaeology student>
Well done. According to Cassius Dio, Didius Julianus' last words prior to his execution (on the orders of the Senate, once it was clear Severus was going to defeat Julianus without much of an effort) were "But what evil have I done? Whom have I killed?"
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by Nekronia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:33 am
The Templar High Council wrote:The number of times Nek makes sense is grossly outnumbered by the times he doesn't.
by The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:35 am
Tagmatium wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:<shakes fist at archaeology student>
Well done. According to Cassius Dio, Didius Julianus' last words prior to his execution (on the orders of the Senate, once it was clear Severus was going to defeat Julianus without much of an effort) were "But what evil have I done? Whom have I killed?"
Archaeology graduate
by Tagmatium » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:43 am
The Archregimancy wrote:And didn't you just pick the perfect time to try and enter the archaeology job market?
<depressed sigh>
So, applied for an MA yet to delay the inevitable?
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
by The Archregimancy » Tue Dec 14, 2010 10:53 am
Tagmatium wrote:
To be fair, any time within the last three or so years wouldn't have been ideal. I'd have to have been born five years before I was to have been able to get a job within archaeology, and the likelihood would've meant that I'd have also been amongst the first to be laid off.
*shrug*
I'm really looking at a Medieval Archaeology masters' at Reading. I'm interested in the Baltic, and a project looking into the ecological impact of the Northern Crusades is starting. I might be able to attach myself to it. I really need to look at funding for it, as I think that'll be the only stumbling block to me doing a Masters'.
Annoyingly, my father hinted that he'd have helped with Masters' funding on my graduation day. Bit too late by then.
by Mike the Progressive » Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:04 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andavarast, Atrito, Boris Johnson MP, El Lazaro, Elwher, HISPIDA, Kostane, Minoa, New Heldervinia, Partybus, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Rusozak, Shearoa, Simonia, Tarsonis, The Huskar Social Union, The Lone Alliance, Torkeland, Uiiop, Yasuragi
Advertisement