NATION

PASSWORD

Should civilization be destroyed?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Civilization...

Is the worst thing that ever happened to humanity.
15
6%
Is the best thing that ever happened to humanity.
108
46%
Is a necessary evil.
16
7%
Is not evil nor good but a natural result of evolution which we cannot undo any more then we can undo the genetic evolution of the last 100,000 years.
98
41%
 
Total votes : 237

User avatar
Natapoc
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19864
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Natapoc » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:16 pm

Trollgaard wrote:Should civilization be destroyed? By all the gods and goddesses of every religion ever known to mankind YES! Civilization is a plague upon humanity, and all life in general. It is inherently destructive, oppressive, and cancerous. It grows and grows without thought to sustainability or regard for other life.

Civilization was the biggest mistake humanity ever made.


Do you think that it is possible to reform civilization in any way as some suggest to make it less destructive?
Did you see a ghost?

User avatar
New Lusitaniagrad
Minister
 
Posts: 3186
Founded: Dec 23, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby New Lusitaniagrad » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:17 pm

Natapoc wrote:
New Lusitaniagrad wrote:I agree. I also enjoy electricity very much.


I like it when the power goes out :) So nice and quite without the constant buzzing of electronics. But I'm weird like that.

It is nice from time to time, yes.
But not so much so when you playing video games and haven't saved from a while.....
Dammed Marxists running about buggering sheep, and other such mischief. We really must do something about that.
-Emperor Ulric VII, Father of The Lusitanian People



User avatar
Fedeledland
Senator
 
Posts: 3785
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedeledland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:20 pm

Trollgaard wrote:Should civilization be destroyed? By all the gods and goddesses of every religion ever known to mankind YES! Civilization is a plague upon humanity, and all life in general. It is inherently destructive, oppressive, and cancerous. It grows and grows without thought to sustainability or regard for other life.

Civilization was the biggest mistake humanity ever made.


We would not have any advanced technology, medicine, art, language, religion, etc. if it was not for the advanced type of culture we call "civilization". Without it, we would return to the Stone Age over a few years.
Factbook (FanT·FT)
Embassies
Political Info (OOC)
WARNING: My writing might contain amounts of extreme pomp and purple prose. Read at your own caution.
QUE VIVA EL REY!

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:22 pm

Fedeledland wrote:We would not have any advanced technology, medicine, art, language, religion, etc. if it was not for the advanced type of culture we call "civilization". Without it, we would return to the Stone Age over a few years.


That's what he wants.

User avatar
Trollgaard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9778
Founded: Mar 01, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Trollgaard » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:25 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Trollgaard wrote:Should civilization be destroyed? By all the gods and goddesses of every religion ever known to mankind YES! Civilization is a plague upon humanity, and all life in general. It is inherently destructive, oppressive, and cancerous. It grows and grows without thought to sustainability or regard for other life.

Civilization was the biggest mistake humanity ever made.


Do you think that it is possible to reform civilization in any way as some suggest to make it less destructive?


Possible, sure, but the probability is very very slight. The powers that be are content with getting rich, and will not allow the radical changes that will be necessary to occur without a fight.

A change in mindset would also be required. The idea that money is paramount needs to go. The desire to aquire more and more stuff needs to be severely curtailed, capitalism and materialism need to become less strong in people's mindsets. People need to realize they don't need the newest gadget the comes out every year, they don't need all the things that companies say they do.

So yeah. Change can happen, but it requires a fundamental change in peoples' mindset as well as new technologies and changes to society functions.

User avatar
Trollgaard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9778
Founded: Mar 01, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Trollgaard » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:26 pm

Fedeledland wrote:
Trollgaard wrote:Should civilization be destroyed? By all the gods and goddesses of every religion ever known to mankind YES! Civilization is a plague upon humanity, and all life in general. It is inherently destructive, oppressive, and cancerous. It grows and grows without thought to sustainability or regard for other life.

Civilization was the biggest mistake humanity ever made.


We would not have any advanced technology, medicine, art, language, religion, etc. if it was not for the advanced type of culture we call "civilization". Without it, we would return to the Stone Age over a few years.


And the bad in that is...what?

User avatar
Fedeledland
Senator
 
Posts: 3785
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedeledland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:28 pm

Trollgaard wrote:
Fedeledland wrote:
We would not have any advanced technology, medicine, art, language, religion, etc. if it was not for the advanced type of culture we call "civilization". Without it, we would return to the Stone Age over a few years.


And the bad in that is...what?

Well, nothing, besides that you would be an ignorant person with the mentality of an ape, with a life span of thirty-two years and with beliefs over the sun and the moon running your average life with a language of under 500 words and whose most advanced building is a collection of stones at the Stonehenge way.
Last edited by Fedeledland on Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Factbook (FanT·FT)
Embassies
Political Info (OOC)
WARNING: My writing might contain amounts of extreme pomp and purple prose. Read at your own caution.
QUE VIVA EL REY!

User avatar
Columbaria
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Oct 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Columbaria » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:29 pm

Civilization can pretty much be created with one family unit or a couple friends. You can be civilized even without technology. The problem, in my opinion, with most civilizations is that the majority thinks it has the right to rule the minority (or weak) thus you can have technology without civilization. Just think of all the many all powerful governments or individuals that were able to act subhuman because those they preyed upon didn't have some form of equalizer!

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:29 pm

Natapoc wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:Nah. Destroying it would be taking the easy way out. We got ourselves into these messes. It's our responsibility to dig ourselves out.


Okay. How will you do that?


I don't think there's much I could do by myself. :?

Assuming a large majority of folk saw things my way, I'd start with America, seeings how it is the most promising. I'd start taking rich people's shit, all of the luxurious shit they wasted precious resources on, leaving them only with the bare middle class essentials. I'd spread all that extra money around, encourage people to get jobs, start businesses, etc. etc. etc., all the shit to get the economy chugging again. Next, I'd boost the educational system and change the teaching methods, placing emphasis on developing and/or exploiting individual talents. After our test scores are #1 again and at least only .5% of people in the U.S. are in poverty (by this point, they either belong in a mental hospital or just can't help themselves), I'd deal with everybody who could potentially fuck up the planet for being trigger happy with their nukes. Afterwards, I get real friendly with the rest of the world. I reform the U.N., get everybody's heads out of their asses, and start working towards the big things: eliminating famine, disease, etc. Next, I form a world government. Don't care who's elected, but if he doesn't stick to his guns, I'll just shoot him and keep running the show.

Finally, after we've secured Earth, we go beyond: colonization. We go in and then we go out. We go into the ocean, build homes there, hopefully curing the overpopulation problem for at least a few years, at least until we can get off the ground. When we can get off the ground, we colonize other planets.

It's going to take a whole lotta money, kill millions of people... But, uh, hey, it'll get us even more money and save billions.

In return, I demand only an infinite supply of books, video games, TV, soda, and peanuts. 8)

User avatar
Kreanoltha
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8117
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kreanoltha » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:31 pm

The Rich Port wrote:Nah. Destroying it would be taking the easy way out. We got ourselves into these messes. It's our responsibility to dig ourselves out.


I'm sorry. You actually want to destroy civilization?
I'M BACK!!!

"The size of ones internet spaceboats are inversely proportional to the size of ones penis."

FT only.
#NSLegion. For all your NS-FT RPing needs.

User avatar
Trollgaard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9778
Founded: Mar 01, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Trollgaard » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:35 pm

Fedeledland wrote:
Trollgaard wrote:
And the bad in that is...what?

Well, nothing, besides that you would be an ignorant person with a life span of thirty-two years and with beliefs over the sun and the moon running your average life with a language of under 500 words and whose most advanced building is a collection of stones at the Stonehenge way.


So pre-civilized people are 'ignorant' are they? You sound like you are the one who is ignorant. Sure they wouldn't know about computers, calculus, etc, but they do know how to live in tune with their environment, how to survive with very little, know what is and is not edible at what timeduring the year, how to find food. So basically they would be ignorant in our world, and we would be ignorant in theirs. Its a matter of perspective.

Living for 32 years? Nope. Try again sir.

How many words do people really need or use anyway? I honestly don't care either way.

Stonehenge is pretty damn impressive, but the type of society that I, and I think Natopoc are talking about is pre Stonehenge stuff. Hunter-gatherers and such.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:38 pm

Trollgaard wrote:So pre-civilized people are 'ignorant' are they? You sound like you are the one who is ignorant. Sure they wouldn't know about computers, calculus, etc, but they do know how to live in tune with their environment, how to survive with very little, know what is and is not edible at what timeduring the year, how to find food. So basically they would be ignorant in our world, and we would be ignorant in theirs. Its a matter of perspective.


So why don't you learn how to do this stuff, and fuck off to the woods to hunt rodents and sleep in caves or mud huts, for the rest of your life?

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:38 pm

Kreanoltha wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:Nah. Destroying it would be taking the easy way out. We got ourselves into these messes. It's our responsibility to dig ourselves out.


I'm sorry. You actually want to destroy civilization?


... No. That would be TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT. WE GOT OURSELVES INTO THIS MESS. :eyebrow:

You can't just be like "Oh, LOL, oops, we fucked up the world. We're gonna hafto nook it and start over, <:)" This isn't NationStates, after all. :)

User avatar
Korintar
Minister
 
Posts: 2448
Founded: Nov 19, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Korintar » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:41 pm

Kreanoltha wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:Nah. Destroying it would be taking the easy way out. We got ourselves into these messes. It's our responsibility to dig ourselves out.


I'm sorry. You actually want to destroy civilization?


No, he thinks it would be much better to take the harder route of reforming civilization. Now a question that has not been posed is what, exactly, are we talking about when we speak of civilization? What does it do, or what is its biological function in sentient species? What are alternative social organs that provide the same beneficial function to our species? What are those alternative institutions advantages and drawbacks as they relate to each other and to civilization?
Factbook, Q&A; Nat'l Standards Warning: Agreeing to RP with me assumes an acceptance of Any-Tech Rping and/or the use of dragons in Warfare unless we come to an agreement beforehand.
Jolt Veteran. (-6.00,-.31), (-7.25,1.08) (economic, social)
'So.... a complete disregard for societal norms is.... communist? If that's true, then sign me up.'- Lunatic Goofballs
'If you're taking White Castle hanburgers rectally, you're really doing that wrong. They go in the other end of the alimentary system.'-Farnhamia
'Space Mussolini! Go, go, go!'- TSS @ GWO
Reppy's PG opinion of Jolt
The Gidgetisms: Go no fuck? The Parkus Empire: As in, go, go Gadget no fuck.
Oterro: International incidents->"New Thread"->[Thread title]->[Thread OP]->War->GWO intervention

User avatar
Trollgaard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9778
Founded: Mar 01, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Trollgaard » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:41 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Trollgaard wrote:So pre-civilized people are 'ignorant' are they? You sound like you are the one who is ignorant. Sure they wouldn't know about computers, calculus, etc, but they do know how to live in tune with their environment, how to survive with very little, know what is and is not edible at what timeduring the year, how to find food. So basically they would be ignorant in our world, and we would be ignorant in theirs. Its a matter of perspective.


So why don't you learn how to do this stuff, and fuck off to the woods to hunt rodents and sleep in caves or mud huts, for the rest of your life?


I would love to, but you know I do actually like people and don't much relish a life alone. Now if I could gather a group of like minded people, then you bet I'd be all for it.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:42 pm

Trollgaard wrote:I would love to, but you know I do actually like people and don't much relish a life alone. Now if I could gather a group of like minded people, then you bet I'd be all for it.


I bet you my entire life savings you wouldn't. Or at least, you wouldn't survive a month.

User avatar
Trollgaard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9778
Founded: Mar 01, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Trollgaard » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:43 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Trollgaard wrote:I would love to, but you know I do actually like people and don't much relish a life alone. Now if I could gather a group of like minded people, then you bet I'd be all for it.


I bet you my entire life savings you wouldn't. Or at least, you wouldn't survive a month.


Have fun being poor, then.

User avatar
Yakutiya
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Dec 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakutiya » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:44 pm

Natapoc wrote:
Yakutiya wrote:
For the same reason the algae, when presented with a temporary glut of nutrients, will increase in numbers at unsustainable levels.

We're animals. It's what we do. It's not smart, perhaps, but nature's self-correcting mechanisms will kick in sooner rather than later.


True but we can always hope that humans are able to demonstrate that they are more rational then algae. Then again, actions speak louder then words...


Precisely.

I would argue the conceit that human beings have this marvelous rational faculty that lifts us above all other animals has played a decisive role in bringing about the current course we have set ourselves on.

Human rationality is the idol of this civilization. It's amusing that so many of the people who rail against god and fancy themselves to be atheists have simply set themselves up another idol in god's place. The narrative of progress that they subscribe to is largely lifted from the apocalyptic narratives of the Christianity they claim to reject.

User avatar
Korintar
Minister
 
Posts: 2448
Founded: Nov 19, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Korintar » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:44 pm

Trollgaard wrote:
Fedeledland wrote:Well, nothing, besides that you would be an ignorant person with a life span of thirty-two years and with beliefs over the sun and the moon running your average life with a language of under 500 words and whose most advanced building is a collection of stones at the Stonehenge way.


So pre-civilized people are 'ignorant' are they? You sound like you are the one who is ignorant. Sure they wouldn't know about computers, calculus, etc, but they do know how to live in tune with their environment, how to survive with very little, know what is and is not edible at what timeduring the year, how to find food. So basically they would be ignorant in our world, and we would be ignorant in theirs. Its a matter of perspective.

Living for 32 years? Nope. Try again sir.

How many words do people really need or use anyway? I honestly don't care either way.

Stonehenge is pretty damn impressive, but the type of society that I, and I think Natopoc are talking about is pre Stonehenge stuff. Hunter-gatherers and such.


I'd say the average, adult modern human uses, on average, about 5,000 words bare minimum. The next closest organisms probably use a tenth of that.
Factbook, Q&A; Nat'l Standards Warning: Agreeing to RP with me assumes an acceptance of Any-Tech Rping and/or the use of dragons in Warfare unless we come to an agreement beforehand.
Jolt Veteran. (-6.00,-.31), (-7.25,1.08) (economic, social)
'So.... a complete disregard for societal norms is.... communist? If that's true, then sign me up.'- Lunatic Goofballs
'If you're taking White Castle hanburgers rectally, you're really doing that wrong. They go in the other end of the alimentary system.'-Farnhamia
'Space Mussolini! Go, go, go!'- TSS @ GWO
Reppy's PG opinion of Jolt
The Gidgetisms: Go no fuck? The Parkus Empire: As in, go, go Gadget no fuck.
Oterro: International incidents->"New Thread"->[Thread title]->[Thread OP]->War->GWO intervention

User avatar
Yakutiya
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 19
Founded: Dec 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Yakutiya » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:45 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Kreanoltha wrote:
I'm sorry. You actually want to destroy civilization?


... No. That would be TAKING THE EASY WAY OUT. WE GOT OURSELVES INTO THIS MESS. :eyebrow:



......but can we get ourselves out? You haven't presented an argument that we can.
Last edited by Yakutiya on Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fedeledland
Senator
 
Posts: 3785
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedeledland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:47 pm

Trollgaard wrote:
So pre-civilized people are 'ignorant' are they? You sound like you are the one who is ignorant. Sure they wouldn't know about computers, calculus, etc, but they do know how to live in tune with their environment, how to survive with very little, know what is and is not edible at what timeduring the year, how to find food. So basically they would be ignorant in our world, and we would be ignorant in theirs. Its a matter of perspective.

OK, I agree. We would be ignorant in their world. But I consider the pre-civilization ignorance that is so large that you cannot write nor read, that you don't have advanced services, economy over basic trading, mathematics or science so that we can understand the world to a deep level greater than out ignorance of surviving with basics, knowing a basic of edible and non-edible food, etc...

Living for 32 years? Nope. Try again sir.


The average lifespan since Homo Sapiens Sapiens evolved from early primates until the Greeks, and later during the Renaissance was always under half a century. Living slightly over 30 years was the average during most of pre-history and ancient history, and then again during the Middle Ages. Without medicine, a goddamned flu could kill you. What do you think would happen to you if you got a heart problem, or pneumonia, or any other complicated disease? You'd die within a month, probably less.

How many words do people really need or use anyway? I honestly don't care either way.

Well, for my part I don't think it would be very attractive if the only things you could say in all possible languages were eat, sleep, and reproduce.
Stonehenge is pretty damn impressive, but the type of society that I, and I think Natopoc are talking about is pre Stonehenge stuff. Hunter-gatherers and such.


Well, that's even worse. Having a skin hide or animal bone camp as your most advanced building would be terrible.
Factbook (FanT·FT)
Embassies
Political Info (OOC)
WARNING: My writing might contain amounts of extreme pomp and purple prose. Read at your own caution.
QUE VIVA EL REY!

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:48 pm

Yakutiya wrote:......but can we get ourselves out? You haven't presented an argument that we can.


If this thread is representative, there most likely isn't an answer, nor is there a desire to find the right way out of the situations in the world.

Didn't you see my other post? It's my way of getting ourselves out of this mess. :lol:

I get the feeling that if an answer doesn't come out eventually, the world will just revert back to primordial ways. Lots of war, lots of death, until finally the population reverts to prehistorical levels. That is, if nuclear weapons don't come into the equation.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:49 pm

Trollgaard wrote:
Hydesland wrote:
I bet you my entire life savings you wouldn't. Or at least, you wouldn't survive a month.


Have fun being poor, then.


Bushmen are still around:

http://www.africaguide.com/culture/tribes/bushmen.htm

Go live with them please.

User avatar
Free Soviets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11256
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Soviets » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:54 pm

Fedeledland wrote:
Trollgaard wrote:Living for 32 years? Nope. Try again sir.

The average lifespan since Homo Sapiens Sapiens evolved from early primates until the Greeks, and later during the Renaissance was always under half a century. Living slightly over 30 years was the average during most of pre-history and ancient history, and then again during the Middle Ages. Without medicine, a goddamned flu could kill you. What do you think would happen to you if you got a heart problem, or pneumonia, or any other complicated disease? You'd die within a month, probably less.

life expectancy at birth, not lifespan

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:58 pm

Natapoc wrote:Well? Should it?


Nope!

What's so good about civilization anyway?


Medicine, computers, broadband. And the fact that you can type this complaint in to add to discussion is a good thing about it.

Imagine how much more easy everything would be without it?


No computers, trains, cars, roads? No nothing? I think it will be alot more inconvenient.

Nearly all the problems that people are so worried about (often to the point of killing each other) these days are the direct result of civilization.


Nope, they're the direct result of the governments who don't think straight on diplomacy. Civilisation only provides the means to do so.

If you could have stopped civilization from ever stating would you have?


Nope

Do you think it is possible to return to a pre civilization state?


Like someone said, it could be possible by wiping out the infrstructure and most of the people and technology too. BUt like that guy said, it will rebound, just in a different kind, though.

If you like civilization why? What value is there in civilization for you personally?


Computers. The fact that I can refute your idea of wiping out civilisation is good. The fact that technology is what can push for less war and a greener Earth (As depicted by environmentalists, those truly commited to the Earth.) is a good thing. It's like the theory of evolution: You stack it up continuously, improving on the creature. Similar story: Technology and infrastructure are improving mankind and such, because everyone's kinda getting the mssage that Earth is in big trouble. (I'm personally worried on the usage of fossil fuels! XD)
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, Galloism, Google [Bot], Herador, In-dia, Kon XXI, Luziyca, New haven america, Shrillland, Syrvanian Republic, The Sherpa Empire, The Union of Galaxies, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads