
by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:19 pm

by The Plutonian Empire » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:22 pm

by Helertia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:26 pm
Natapoc wrote:Well? Should it? What's so good about civilization anyway? Imagine how much more easy everything would be without it? Nearly all the problems that people are so worried about (often to the point of killing each other) these days are the direct result of civilization.
If you could have stopped civilization from ever stating would you have?
Do you think it is possible to return to a pre civilization state?
If you like civilization why? What value is there in civilization for you personally?

by Kalysk » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:27 pm
Rhodmhire wrote:Kalysk you are a total fucking bro for professing your love (of Erasure)

by Avenio » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:27 pm
Natapoc wrote:If you could have stopped civilization from ever stating would you have?
Natapoc wrote:Do you think it is possible to return to a pre civilization state?
Natapoc wrote:If you like civilization why?
Natapoc wrote:What value is there in civilization for you personally?

by Ifreann » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:32 pm

by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:33 pm

by Brogavia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:35 pm

by Hydesland » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:38 pm
Natapoc wrote:Civilization also spreads these "preventable" and not so preventable diseases.

by Nadkor » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:39 pm

by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:42 pm
Nadkor wrote:If we're doing the whole Sea Peoples thing again, can it please be noted that I get seasick in small boats.

by The Deleted Chris » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:44 pm

by Ifreann » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:45 pm
Natapoc wrote:Avenio wrote:
Not dying of easily preventable disease, food I don't have to kill myself, not dying at the natural age of fourty. Among many other reasons.
The things listed above, as well as modern science, technology and culture.
Presuming your claim that the natural age of pre civilization humans was 40 (which there is no proof) then you would have, as a pre civilization human felt that it was the natural time to die just as you (or most people) currently can't imagine wanting to live past a certain age granted to you by civilization so also as a pre civilization human you would accept your dieing age as normal.
Civilization also spreads these "preventable" and not so preventable diseases.

by The Batorys » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:47 pm
Hydesland wrote:Natapoc wrote:Civilization also spreads these "preventable" and not so preventable diseases.
It also spreads ideas and knowledge, technology, music, art, literature, creative works and excitement from sufring to roller-coasters, from videogames to rock concerts. I don't want to live in a world without this.

by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:48 pm
Bafuria wrote:No thanks, I like my current life expectancy of 79.6 years.

by Athiests4AnimalRights » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:49 pm

by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:50 pm
Ifreann wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Presuming your claim that the natural age of pre civilization humans was 40 (which there is no proof) then you would have, as a pre civilization human felt that it was the natural time to die just as you (or most people) currently can't imagine wanting to live past a certain age granted to you by civilization so also as a pre civilization human you would accept your dieing age as normal.
Except we know that with the proper application of civilisation and medicine we can live pretty decent lives into our 80s.Civilization also spreads these "preventable" and not so preventable diseases.
And gives us a way to treat them. I don't mind getting sick knowing I can get some medicine. Getting sick and knowing I'm now likely to die, fuck that noise.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:50 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Nerditopia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:50 pm

by Brogavia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:51 pm
Natapoc wrote:Bafuria wrote:No thanks, I like my current life expectancy of 79.6 years.
Since this implied myth keeps being repeated I'll correct it for you. There is a certain misunderstanding with regard to "life expectancy."
These numbers refer to "life expectancy at birth" There are a few life points (mostly early childhood) where if you survive then you will live for a very long time. There were certainly 90 year olds in pre civ time.
Assuming you yourself are older than a young child (a good assumption I believe) you yourself would probably not have a significant difference in life expectancy.

by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:52 pm
Athiests4AnimalRights wrote:I feel obliged to point out that, without civilization, we would not have sufficient infrastructure to prepare B-12 in vitamin form, and thus all humanity would be forced to return to an omnivorous diet.
Food for thought, you know.

by Natapoc » Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:53 pm
Brogavia wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Since this implied myth keeps being repeated I'll correct it for you. There is a certain misunderstanding with regard to "life expectancy."
These numbers refer to "life expectancy at birth" There are a few life points (mostly early childhood) where if you survive then you will live for a very long time. There were certainly 90 year olds in pre civ time.
Assuming you yourself are older than a young child (a good assumption I believe) you yourself would probably not have a significant difference in life expectancy.
He also probably doesn't want to have to deal with his children dying.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dimetrodon Empire, Hrofguard, Kostane, Lysset, Maurnindaia, New Perfectistan, Philjia, Riviere Renard, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, Thermodolia
Advertisement