NATION

PASSWORD

What is a fair punishment for rape?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:53 am

Altamirus wrote:
Bottle wrote:So?

She gets to say "stop" whenever the hell she wants. Why would you want to keep fucking her if she's telling you to stop?

I didn't say that. I said she passed out. She didn't say no, she passed out. Same problem if she were to dose off, is it rape to go off of prior consent when there is situation where there is no indication whether or not your partner wants you to keep going or not?

Said partner is a rapist.

I mean, if you're a banker, do you give a person's asset when they get into a coma? Not only its unethical, but its also illegal. Yeah yeah, the analogy is a red herring, but the meaning is the same.
Last edited by Norstal on Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:10 am

Trotskylvania wrote:
Person012345 wrote:Yes, because losing your main source of testosterone isn't going to affect your sex drive or anything.

Rape has absolutely nothing to do with a person's sex drive. People don't commit rape, violent or otherwise, because they're horny. It's due to a fundamental lack of respect for the autonomy of the other person. Either they get off to the violence and the power, or they somehow feel entitled to the sex.

Source?

You commit acts like murder, spousal abuse, etc. if you have no respect for other people's rights and no sex drive. Generally speaking, rape does require someone to have a desire for sex. Otherwise they just do something else.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:12 am

Bottle wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:
So a person who rapes a passed out girl is doing it for the violence or power?

Often times yes. Sometimes they are doing it because of homosocial pressure. Sometimes they are doing it out of anger, if the girl rejected them or they believed she would reject them if they were conscious.

I'm sure some rapists also rape because they want to masturbate into a girl's body and don't particular care how she feels about it, but I wouldn't equate that with being "horny" in the conventional sense. They aren't looking for sex, because sex is a mutual act involving more than one person...a person who wants to use an unconscious girl's body for gratification is not looking for sex, he is simply looking for a means of using another person's body like a Fleshlight.

But the only reason he'd use it for sexual gratification is if he has desire for sexual gratification.

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:15 am

Bendira wrote:
Bottle wrote:If you find it difficult to stop fucking non-consenting people, seek help.


Presumably they gave consent before they passed out. Woman use rape as a weapon and attention seeking tool, so you have to narrow what can be considered rape considerably. Changing your mind in the middle randomly right ebfore it is over, or passing out is just wrong.

Yeah I know. I was choking some girl so she couldn't say no (and it's not rape if they don't say no amirite?) and she went and passed out. It's just rude. Then you know what happened? Those fucking cops came along and arrested me. I mean, what right do they have to take away my freedom just because I was forcibly having my way with some girl who didn't want it? I didn't sign no social contract. It's kidnapping!

User avatar
Psyonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 204
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Psyonia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:19 am

10-20 years in a penal labor camp and chemical castration.

User avatar
Latnya
Senator
 
Posts: 3953
Founded: Nov 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Latnya » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:20 am

Hmm Depends on the Rape.

Offender + Victim
Male + Male = Death
Female + Male= Eh he wanted it
Male + Female = Death
Female + Female = a Awesome crime but still death


and this is not taking into consideration of age, attractivenesses or relationship to the victim.

User avatar
Dempublicents1
Senator
 
Posts: 3963
Founded: Mar 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Dempublicents1 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:21 am

Altamirus wrote:I didn't say that. I said she passed out. She didn't say no, she passed out. Same problem if she were to dose off, is it rape to go off of prior consent when there is situation where there is no indication whether or not your partner wants you to keep going or not?


Of course it is. Consent is an ongoing process, not a one-time thing. You cannot just assume consent - you need to be sure that you have it.
"If I poke you with a needle, you feel pain. If I hit you repeatedly in the testicles with a brick, you feel pain. Ergo, the appropriate response to being vaccinated is to testicle-punch your doctor with a brick. It all makes perfect sense now!" -The Norwegian Blue

"In fact, the post was blended with four delicious flavors of sarcasm, then dipped in an insincerity sauce, breaded with mock seriousness, then deep fried in scalding, trans-fat-free-sarcasm oil." - Flameswroth

User avatar
Vetok
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1986
Founded: Oct 24, 2009
Democratic Socialists

Postby Vetok » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:24 am

Person012345 wrote:
Trotskylvania wrote:Rape has absolutely nothing to do with a person's sex drive. People don't commit rape, violent or otherwise, because they're horny. It's due to a fundamental lack of respect for the autonomy of the other person. Either they get off to the violence and the power, or they somehow feel entitled to the sex.

Source?

You commit acts like murder, spousal abuse, etc. if you have no respect for other people's rights and no sex drive. Generally speaking, rape does require someone to have a desire for sex. Otherwise they just do something else.


Rape can be attributed more to a desire to hold power over someone rather than lustful desires. Look at prisons that use rape as a interrogation tool. It'd be more correct to say that the wardens would be using rape to show their power rather than because they fancy getting it on with someone.

User avatar
The Congregationists
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1770
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Congregationists » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:25 am

Free Lelouche wrote:
Bottle wrote:So?

She gets to say "stop" whenever the hell she wants. Why would you want to keep fucking her if she's telling you to stop?
Blue balls

it hurts when you stop in the middle

Plus that is kinda a dick move

I would stop, but also I would be pretty pissed off about it, and apologies had better be given otherwise that person might not see me around anymore


I probobly wouldn't date someone who did something like this just to spite me or show me who was boss (though I would follow through on their wishes to stop). Thing of it is though, how often does that actually happen?

In my entire lifetime, I've partaken in sexual intercourse a number of time approaching, if not exceeding a four digit figure. Things were interrupted mid-coitus three times to my recollection - and all were at my initiative (I should wonder Free Lalouche whether you saw that one coming or not. Just to clarify, I stand up to pee). Once because it was causing me exceeding pain, another time because one of our kids was at the bedroom door trying to get in and the last because she was complaining of being sick to her stomach, but still wanted me to proceed, so to speak. Wise move on my part - projectile vomit has a way of spoiling the romance, if you follow.

Stopping mid-coitus isn't a lot of fun, but like has been suggested, that's why they invented vasaline and right hands. Should any participant in a sexual act HAVE to carry on to the bitter end if, say, sickness, pain or what have you makes it very onerous? What if the kids (or parents or legal spouse) walks in? What if you just have to get back to NSG and argue points like this page after page ... okay, maybe not that but you get the picture. I agree it's a "dick move" to make simply out of spite, but there are all kinds of reasons why the sex act might have to stop midway through that have nothing to do with that.
•Criticism of sentimental love, marriage, sex, religion, and rituals.
•Valuing reason over emotion and imagination
•Ironic, indirect, and impersonal (objective) representation of ideas.
•Uncompromising criticism of romantic illusions.
•Advocacy of pragmatism and disapproval of idealism and ideology.
•Especially vehement opposition to neo-liberalism, social democracy, communism, libertarianism and feminism.
•Satirisation of irrational and whimsical attitudes of the so-called creative class.
•Criticism of social, political, cultural, and moral customs and manners of the contemporary society.

User avatar
GothicLust
Diplomat
 
Posts: 544
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GothicLust » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:25 am

Free Lelouche wrote:
Bottle wrote:So?

She gets to say "stop" whenever the hell she wants. Why would you want to keep fucking her if she's telling you to stop?
Blue balls

it hurts when you stop in the middle

Plus that is kinda a dick move

I would stop, but also I would be pretty pissed off about it, and apologies had better be given otherwise that person might not see me around anymore

You know raping is a dick move right?

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:32 am

Latnya wrote:Hmm Depends on the Rape.

Offender + Victim
Male + Male = Death
Female + Male= Eh he wanted it
Male + Female = Death
Female + Female = a Awesome crime but still death


and this is not taking into consideration of age, attractivenesses or relationship to the victim.


I have italicised that which is utter bullshit.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Latnya
Senator
 
Posts: 3953
Founded: Nov 29, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Latnya » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:35 am

Oterro wrote:
Latnya wrote:Hmm Depends on the Rape.

Offender + Victim
Male + Male = Death
Female + Male= Eh he wanted it
Male + Female = Death
Female + Female = a Awesome crime but still death


and this is not taking into consideration of age, attractivenesses or relationship to the victim.


I have italicised that which is utter bullshit.


yes it is bull, but im a crazy person wtf do you want me to do about it

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:41 am

Latnya wrote:
Oterro wrote:
I have italicised that which is utter bullshit.


yes it is bull, but im a crazy person wtf do you want me to do about it


I want you to try and not blurt stuff like that out. Can I make you stop saying stuff resembling it? No. Would I like you to? Yes. Rape is rape, and while a female violating a male is far less common than a man raping a woman, it is still a heinous and horrible crime.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:54 am

Person012345 wrote:
Gravlen wrote:But I'm glad you now say that you don't think people should see rape and beating as part of the punishment

I'm sorry, did I say that? I'm pretty sure I didn't.

My mistake, I misread that part.

So what is your stance then?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:55 am

Wiztopia wrote:
Gravlen wrote:
It can be. When you chose apathy/indifference towards injustice, even if that injustice happens to convicted criminals, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. And doing so, you try to avoid taking your share of the responsibility for letting it happen because, hey, you're simply not caring and not actually doing the evil deeds. It is the path of a coward.


Uh no.
cow·ard·ice
   /ˈkaʊərdɪs/ Show Spelled[kou-er-dis] Show IPA
–noun
lack of courage to face danger, difficulty, opposition, pain, etc.

–noun
1.
lack of interest or concern: We were shocked by their indifference toward poverty.

2 completely different things. If somebody doesn't care about something then by that definition it doesn't make them a coward.

When they choose to not care, and thus take the side of the oppressor, they have done so lacking the courage to actually state their position so they can avoid taking responibility for the consequences that follow. i.e. saying "I don't care" equals "I support it happening".

It's all there in my post, I really shouldn't have to spell it out for someone who is capable of looking up undisputed words in the dictionary.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
The Norwegian Blue
Minister
 
Posts: 2529
Founded: Jul 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Norwegian Blue » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:56 am

Latnya wrote:Female + Male= Eh he wanted it
Female + Female = a Awesome crime but still death


You are really not funny. I get that you're probably young enough that you're still in the phase of life where you think saying moronic and offensive things is hilarious in and of itself, but...it's not. It's just moronic and offensive. Rape is never "awesome" and rape victims by definition do not "want it." I sincerely hope you never find out firsthand just how non-awesome being raped is.
Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things. - Reichskommissariat ost
...if you poop just to poop, then it is immoral. - Bandarikin
And if abortion was illegal, there wouldn't be male doctors - Green Port
Stop making a potato punch itself in the scrote after first manifesting a fist and a scrote. - RepentNowOrPayLater
And...you aren't aroused by the premise of a snot-hocking giraffe leaping through a third story bay window after a sex toy? What are you...I mean...are you some kind of weirdo or something? - Hammurab

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:59 am

Bendira wrote:
Bottle wrote:If you find it difficult to stop fucking non-consenting people, seek help.


Presumably they gave consent before they passed out. Woman use rape as a weapon and attention seeking tool, so you have to narrow what can be considered rape considerably. Changing your mind in the middle randomly right ebfore it is over, or passing out is just wrong.

Presumably they gave consent before they passed out... Ok, but how can you presume that they gave consent for continuing to have sex after they passed out?

People have the right to change their minds, and that is to be respected. It's your obligation to stop when the other party says that this is going too far, or that he doesn't want to do this anymore. The fact that some people have used presented false allegations of rape for varying purposes in the past doesn't change that at all.

And how in the Hell can it be "wrong" to pass out?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:02 pm

Latnya wrote:
Oterro wrote:
I have italicised that which is utter bullshit.


yes it is bull, but im a crazy person wtf do you want me to do about it

Seek help?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:07 pm

Trotskylvania wrote:Rape has absolutely nothing to do with a person's sex drive. People don't commit rape, violent or otherwise, because they're horny. It's due to a fundamental lack of respect for the autonomy of the other person. Either they get off to the violence and the power, or they somehow feel entitled to the sex.

I think Wikipedia says it well:

There is no single theory that conclusively explains the motivation for rape; the motives of rapists can be multi-factorial and are the subject of debate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_for_rape

There doesn't appear to be a basis for absolutely discounting a person's sex drive as a factor. The picture seems to be more complex.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:13 pm

There are a lot of aggravating factors for rape and I do not think that there is a 1 size fits all punishment. Factors like knowingly being infected with an STD and then raping someone can make it very serious especially HIV/AIDS . The level of violence used is also an aggravating factor. I also think that the raped person can be an aggravating factor too. Man rapers and child rapers are the worst. Rapers of senile old ladies and other handicapped people are pretty bad too. Prostitute rapers are not all that bad because after all they are just whores. That probably is not PC but PC people have a scant hold on the truth anyway. It also kinda depends on whether it is a war rape because that is a mitigating factor. However, the war rapes can be pretty brutal and certainly warrant death.

Rape is one of those very scary crimes where it seems that there might be a lot of false convictions so that sort of makes me not want these people to get the death sentence unless there are a lot of aggravating factors. I have no source for this but it just seems like it might be the case.

User avatar
Atheimsa
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 478
Founded: Nov 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Atheimsa » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:14 pm

I think continuing sex while your spouse passed out is kinda sick anyway..
factbook

Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -6
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7

User avatar
The Norwegian Blue
Minister
 
Posts: 2529
Founded: Jul 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Norwegian Blue » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:22 pm

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Prostitute rapers are not all that bad because after all they are just whores. That probably is not PC but PC people have a scant hold on the truth anyway.


Yeah, "prostitutes are still human beings" is clearly a totally unreasonable and untrue statement.

It also kinda depends on whether it is a war rape because that is a mitigating factor.


How the hell is that a mitigating factor?
Women are as good as men , I dont know why they constantly whine about things. - Reichskommissariat ost
...if you poop just to poop, then it is immoral. - Bandarikin
And if abortion was illegal, there wouldn't be male doctors - Green Port
Stop making a potato punch itself in the scrote after first manifesting a fist and a scrote. - RepentNowOrPayLater
And...you aren't aroused by the premise of a snot-hocking giraffe leaping through a third story bay window after a sex toy? What are you...I mean...are you some kind of weirdo or something? - Hammurab

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:30 pm

Glorious Freedonia wrote: Man rapers [...] are the worst.

Based on... what?

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Prostitute rapers are not all that bad because after all they are just whores.

...say what?

I'm loathe to ask this but... Explain that reasoning?

Glorious Freedonia wrote:It also kinda depends on whether it is a war rape because that is a mitigating factor.

...

I'm horrified to ask this but... Explain that reasoning?

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Rape is one of those very scary crimes where it seems that there might be a lot of false convictions so that sort of makes me not want these people to get the death sentence unless there are a lot of aggravating factors. I have no source for this but it just seems like it might be the case.

So... You're basically just pulling stuff out of your ass?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:32 pm

The Norwegian Blue wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Prostitute rapers are not all that bad because after all they are just whores. That probably is not PC but PC people have a scant hold on the truth anyway.


Yeah, "prostitutes are still human beings" is clearly a totally unreasonable and untrue statement.

It also kinda depends on whether it is a war rape because that is a mitigating factor.


How the hell is that a mitigating factor?

Nobody said that prostitutes are not people. At least I sure did not. They do an important job in our society. It just does not seem that it would be as traumatic for a whore to have sex with a stranger as it might be for the average person. With the whore it is more like well they were stolen from than the victim of a violent attack on their person.

War rape is mitigating because there is in many cultures like Russia a rich tradition of war rape. We saw it in our involvement with the Boxer Rebellion and we saw it in Germany. This factor is mitigating but there are still other factors that aggravate it. For example, there are some brutal war rapes throughout Africa that are death penalty worthy for sure.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:36 pm

Glorious Freedonia wrote: Man rapers and child rapers are the worst. Rapers of senile old ladies and other handicapped people are pretty bad too. Prostitute rapers are not all that bad because after all they are just whores.

Women can put shards of glass up your ass, just like a man can stick a penis up your ass. Its not "worse".

Glorious Freedonia wrote:Nobody said that prostitutes are not people. At least I sure did not. They do an important job in our society. It just does not seem that it would be as traumatic for a whore to have sex with a stranger as it might be for the average person. With the whore it is more like well they were stolen from than the victim of a violent attack on their person.

You are so wrong. Throwing a baseball at a baseball player in their head has the same effect of throwing a baseball at a non-baseball player.

War rape is mitigating because there is in many cultures like Russia a rich tradition of war rape. We saw it in our involvement with the Boxer Rebellion and we saw it in Germany. This factor is mitigating but there are still other factors that aggravate it. For example, there are some brutal war rapes throughout Africa that are death penalty worthy for sure.

When cultural traditions conflicts with international law, its bad.
Last edited by Norstal on Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chacapoya, Chernobyl and Pripyat

Advertisement

Remove ads