NATION

PASSWORD

Legal Right to die

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Servantium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1153
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Servantium » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:29 pm

Urcea wrote:
Eireann Fae wrote:
It doesn't have to be negative.


Suicide is always negative.

The rest of that sentence should be: "...in my opinion."

User avatar
The Scandinvans
Senator
 
Posts: 4948
Founded: Oct 09, 2004
Capitalizt

Postby The Scandinvans » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:30 pm

I actually heard a person say all doctors should be required to give euthanasia themselves to willing individuals...

I facepalmed in response.

As for the topic at hand. I should not be a legal offense nor should it be covered by national finances or unwilling insurance companies.
We are the Glorious Empire of the Scandinvans. Surrender or be destroyed. Your civilization has ended, your time is over. Your people will be assimilated into our Empire. Your technological distinctiveness shall be added to our own. Your culture shall be supplanted by our own. And your lands will be made into our lands.

"For five thousand years has our Empire endured. In war and peace we have thrived. Against overwhelming odds we evolved. No matter what we face we have always survived and grown. We shall always be triumphant." -Emperor Godfrey II

Hope for a brighter tomorrow - fight the fight, find the cure

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:30 pm

Urcea wrote:
Eireann Fae wrote:
It doesn't have to be negative.


Suicide is always negative.


Well that's just, like, your opinion, man. I prefer to call it the beginning of an unlife :)

Or the end of a useless ugly bag of mostly water. Or an end to suffering in general. Buddhists can see it as the beginning of their next life :D

There's lots of ways to look at suicide. Open your eyes a little. It's not inherently 'negative'.

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:31 pm

The Scandinvans wrote:I actually heard a person say all doctors should be required to give euthanasia themselves to willing individuals...

I facepalmed in response.

As for the topic at hand. I should not be a legal offense nor should it be covered by national finances or unwilling insurance companies.


I wouldn't force doctors to do it, but I wouldn't stop the ones that want to offer the service.

User avatar
Urcea
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1902
Founded: Jul 13, 2005
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Urcea » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:32 pm

Eireann Fae wrote:Well that's just, like, your opinion, man. I prefer to call it the beginning of an unlife :)

Or the end of a useless ugly bag of mostly water. Or an end to suffering in general. Buddhists can see it as the beginning of their next life :D

There's lots of ways to look at suicide. Open your eyes a little. It's not inherently 'negative'.


The effect of a suicide on those who knew the person is, frankly, indescribable. In addition, it's shameful, in my opinion; you've been given this life, no matter atheist, Christian, or otherwise; it's a shame to let this opportunity go to waste.
The Federal Republic of Urcea
President| Brianna Johnson
National Ideology| National Democracy
National Info/Links| Factbook, NSEconomy, Roman Catholic Church

User avatar
Servantium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1153
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Servantium » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:33 pm

Eireann Fae wrote:
The Scandinvans wrote:I actually heard a person say all doctors should be required to give euthanasia themselves to willing individuals...

I facepalmed in response.

As for the topic at hand. I should not be a legal offense nor should it be covered by national finances or unwilling insurance companies.


I wouldn't force doctors to do it, but I wouldn't stop the ones that want to offer the service.

If it were legal hospitals would probably have a "euthanasia team" that does everybody.

User avatar
UCUMAY
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Aug 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby UCUMAY » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:36 pm

Urcea wrote:
UCUMAY wrote:
I know the is no "right to die" in the states. I live in USA. Deplorable is an opinion (your opinion). Please present something with fact like the aftermath when someone invokes the right to die.


So you're going to argue suicide is a positive?


I'm arguing right to choice. Sucide and death for that matter only harm those left behind. So my humble opinion is regardless whether it's right, wrong, or indifferent I should be able to do with my body what I please. Whether it's pierce my ears, get a tattoo, or asking for help in dying.

My personal opinion (which is up to debate) and my life experience (which is not) help form these. I have been both chronically (physically) ill, and mental ill so I can say this from experience if I were to crop up with some autoimmune like Lupus, or MS. I would prefer to DIE than to live that life again (because of the health issues). So yes for me if that were to happen to me it would be positive. Because I would be a drain on the medical profession with no easy options, or ways out. I would have the choices to be so immune deprieved that I have no quality of life, or let the MS/lupus ravage me. Again my personal viewpoint and situation. Your's I'm sure is different.
The Proclaimed Psycho on NSG
About me
I may be young, and that's okay. Since age does not always bring wisdom. I may be stubborn to the point of stupidity; but at least I fight for my beliefs. I may be fooled by a lie; but I can then say I trusted. My heart may get broken however, then I can say I truly loved. With all this said I have lived. :D

I'm politically syncretic so stop asking. :)
My political and social missions

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:38 pm

I don't think so, unless they are terminally ill or sick beyond any point of saving and will just instead suffer.

User avatar
UCUMAY
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Aug 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby UCUMAY » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:53 pm

The right to die seems to have the same three stigmas all the other major social issues do. I'm (uncomfortable, against my religion, don't like it ect.), I (agree, accept, understand, feel) people should have more (rights, freedoms, self-ownership), or what's wrong with the way it is now...
The Proclaimed Psycho on NSG
About me
I may be young, and that's okay. Since age does not always bring wisdom. I may be stubborn to the point of stupidity; but at least I fight for my beliefs. I may be fooled by a lie; but I can then say I trusted. My heart may get broken however, then I can say I truly loved. With all this said I have lived. :D

I'm politically syncretic so stop asking. :)
My political and social missions

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:07 pm

Galloism wrote:
Norstal wrote:Oic, an MD like you should've told me first hand that all cancer is a disease of the mind.

It's not, but I don't see what the difference is, as I was talking with bottle before.

Cancer is painful, and, in some cases, incurable. In those cases, people will writhe in pain until they die.

Depression is painful, and, in some cases, incurable. In those cases, the person will writhe in pain until they die.

What's the difference?

No, really Galloism. I wish a qualified MD told me that bone cancer and lung cancer somehow affects the brain the way Major Depressive Disorder does.

The difference between cancer (except brain cancer) and depression is that it affects the brain. And we just talked about that some depressed patients can't make sound judgement. What I'm aiming is at is whether a depressive patient can make sound judgement or not and that we can't tell the difference.

Cancer patients (again, who doesn't have brain cancer) is able to choose whether they want to live or not because they're able to. Depressed patients can't because they have a mental disorder. Not to mention the medicine that they're taking can cause the suicide themselves. So, no, treatment-resistant depression patients who wants to suicide should not be allowed to be given euthanasia.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:44 pm

Fionnuala_Saoirse wrote:According to you they should.

No? Doctors do have the power to control the life of their patients.

I'm starting to think you're a hermit to think that's the way things work.

Fortunately you're an anonymous internet troll and not a medical professional.

Says the person who lurks on a forum late at night.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72270
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:55 pm

Norstal wrote:
Galloism wrote:It's not, but I don't see what the difference is, as I was talking with bottle before.

Cancer is painful, and, in some cases, incurable. In those cases, people will writhe in pain until they die.

Depression is painful, and, in some cases, incurable. In those cases, the person will writhe in pain until they die.

What's the difference?

No, really Galloism. I wish a qualified MD told me that bone cancer and lung cancer somehow affects the brain the way Major Depressive Disorder does.


Constant unrelenting incurable pain often affects the brain. I'm not sure the way the two different kinds of pain affect the brain, identically or not, but if you don't think that constant unrelenting affects the brain, I don't know what to tell you.

The difference between cancer (except brain cancer) and depression is that it affects the brain. And we just talked about that some depressed patients can't make sound judgement. What I'm aiming is at is whether a depressive patient can make sound judgement or not and that we can't tell the difference.


We can't? Then why do we let them drive vehicles, operate gas appliances, and cross the street on their own? The reason is that we recognize some (most) depressed people as capable of making sound decisions. Hell, in most cases, they choose their own doctors, and can accept or reject medications at their discretion.

See, in some cases, these things are restricted, because we are capable of telling whether a person is competent to make decisions. Those that are get to go on with their lives and make decisions about it. Those that can't get committed. See?
Cancer patients (again, who doesn't have brain cancer) is able to choose whether they want to live or not because they're able to. Depressed patients can't because they have a mental disorder. Not to mention the medicine that they're taking can cause the suicide themselves. So, no, treatment-resistant depression patients who wants to suicide should not be allowed to be given euthanasia.


Demonstrate, please, that all depressed persons are incapable of making sound decisions. It seems we don't treat them that way, except regarding this one particular issue.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72270
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:20 pm

Norstal wrote:
Fionnuala_Saoirse wrote:According to you they should.

No? Doctors do have the power to control the life of their patients.

No, actually they don't, except in very rare circumstances.

If a patient is conscious and cognizant, he may refuse any treatment at any time for any reason, and if the doctor proceeds, it's at the very least malpractice, if not battery.

If the patient has a medical power of attorney, and the doctor acts against its instructions while the patient is unconscious, it's battery.

If the patient has previously refused a treatment, and the doctor does it after he is incapacitated, without getting consent from the patient's medical representative, it's battery.

Are we getting the picture?
Last edited by Galloism on Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:23 pm

Galloism wrote:
Norstal wrote:No, really Galloism. I wish a qualified MD told me that bone cancer and lung cancer somehow affects the brain the way Major Depressive Disorder does.


Constant unrelenting incurable pain often affects the brain. I'm not sure the way the two different kinds of pain affect the brain, identically or not, but if you don't think that constant unrelenting affects the brain, I don't know what to tell you.

The difference between cancer (except brain cancer) and depression is that it affects the brain. And we just talked about that some depressed patients can't make sound judgement. What I'm aiming is at is whether a depressive patient can make sound judgement or not and that we can't tell the difference.


We can't? Then why do we let them drive vehicles, operate gas appliances, and cross the street on their own? The reason is that we recognize some (most) depressed people as capable of making sound decisions. Hell, in most cases, they choose their own doctors, and can accept or reject medications at their discretion.

See, in some cases, these things are restricted, because we are capable of telling whether a person is competent to make decisions. Those that are get to go on with their lives and make decisions about it. Those that can't get committed. See?
Cancer patients (again, who doesn't have brain cancer) is able to choose whether they want to live or not because they're able to. Depressed patients can't because they have a mental disorder. Not to mention the medicine that they're taking can cause the suicide themselves. So, no, treatment-resistant depression patients who wants to suicide should not be allowed to be given euthanasia.


Demonstrate, please, that all depressed persons are incapable of making sound decisions. It seems we don't treat them that way, except regarding this one particular issue.

Tbh, if everyone makes good points like you, I would've concede a long time ago. Instead, what I got was facepalms and accusations of me trolling.

But, I can see where you're coming from now.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72270
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:28 pm

Norstal wrote:
Galloism wrote:
Constant unrelenting incurable pain often affects the brain. I'm not sure the way the two different kinds of pain affect the brain, identically or not, but if you don't think that constant unrelenting affects the brain, I don't know what to tell you.



We can't? Then why do we let them drive vehicles, operate gas appliances, and cross the street on their own? The reason is that we recognize some (most) depressed people as capable of making sound decisions. Hell, in most cases, they choose their own doctors, and can accept or reject medications at their discretion.

See, in some cases, these things are restricted, because we are capable of telling whether a person is competent to make decisions. Those that are get to go on with their lives and make decisions about it. Those that can't get committed. See?


Demonstrate, please, that all depressed persons are incapable of making sound decisions. It seems we don't treat them that way, except regarding this one particular issue.

Tbh, if everyone makes good points like you, I would've concede a long time ago. Instead, what I got was facepalms and accusations of me trolling.

But, I can see where you're coming from now.

Good deal. I bear you no ill will, but you were not seeing that it was not all black and white. Every situation is different, and should be treated accordingly.

If I have opened your mind a bit to what other people face, and allowed you to feel sympathy, I am satisfied with today's work.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:10 am

Galloism wrote:
Call to power wrote:no because its hilariously open to abuse and not exactly the sign of someone who has the right capacity to be making such a decision

Why does wishing to die automatically imply insanity?


How does one know that the depression is not temporary? Will dumped middle school girls be lining themselves up in front of clinics of death? Will a man fired from his job, in a moment of unclear thinking, be terminated by the state with all blessing? My gosh, I never could imagine a world where we accept suicide or at least look at it as any other thing but negative.

User avatar
Servantium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1153
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Servantium » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:15 am

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Galloism wrote:Why does wishing to die automatically imply insanity?

How does one know that the depression is not temporary?

Why should that matter?

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:34 am

Yes, people should have the right to commit suicide, based on the same self-ownership principles which tend to make me support legalization fo drugs and the like.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:37 am

The Scandinvans wrote:As for the topic at hand. I should not be a legal offense nor should it be covered by national finances or unwilling insurance companies.

I'd think insurance companies would jump at the chance to cover it tbh.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:39 am

Lackadaisical2 wrote:
The Scandinvans wrote:As for the topic at hand. I should not be a legal offense nor should it be covered by national finances or unwilling insurance companies.

I'd think insurance companies would jump at the chance to cover it tbh.


Well that depends on what else is wrong with you
If you are otherwise healthy and paying more into insurance then you are taking out, then offing you isn't cost effective, they need your money to pay for other peoples healthcare.

However if your a financial burden to the Insurance, I would totally see them suggesting/encouraging suicide as a cost effective alternative treatment, indeed they might make it one of the only options under certain conditions

And the really crooked ones, would probably pay doctors to mess up your paperwork, and replace your morphine drip with a cyanide drip.

"He asked to die...I have the paperwork right here"
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:49 am

Yes, they should have the right to die, because it's their body, not some state's body. (Saying this in reference to the ban of euthansia in most countries.)
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Georgism
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9940
Founded: Mar 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Georgism » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:52 am

Everybody should be able to choose their own time of death if they feel they can go on longer.

I do however feel that suicide is bad and should thus be punished by death.
Georgism Factbook (including questions and answers)
¯\(°_o)/¯
Horsefish wrote:I agree with George

User avatar
NordLander
Envoy
 
Posts: 237
Founded: Oct 12, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby NordLander » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:55 am

If you commit suicide, you are sooo gonna be arrested! :palm:

User avatar
UCUMAY
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6312
Founded: Aug 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby UCUMAY » Sat Nov 20, 2010 5:54 am

Georgism wrote:Everybody should be able to choose their own time of death if they feel they can go on longer.

I do however feel that suicide is bad and should thus be punished by death.


Great arguement it makes a lot of sense.... :roll:
The Proclaimed Psycho on NSG
About me
I may be young, and that's okay. Since age does not always bring wisdom. I may be stubborn to the point of stupidity; but at least I fight for my beliefs. I may be fooled by a lie; but I can then say I trusted. My heart may get broken however, then I can say I truly loved. With all this said I have lived. :D

I'm politically syncretic so stop asking. :)
My political and social missions

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:06 am

UCUMAY wrote:
Georgism wrote:Everybody should be able to choose their own time of death if they feel they can go on longer.

I do however feel that suicide is bad and should thus be punished by death.


Great arguement it makes a lot of sense.... :roll:


That actually was the law in quite a few countries for quite a while.

And it even makes sense from a Christian perspective. Suiciders go to hell. People that were sentenced to death not necessarily.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Al Concerman, El Lazaro, Hispida, Molither, Thepeopl, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads