NATION

PASSWORD

Geert Wilders - The man or... not the man?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Geert Wilders - The man or... not the man?

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:51 am

I want to know what the NS opinion of Geert Wilders is.

To begin with - who is the man?
He's a Dutch politician, chairman of the PVV ("Party for Freedom") most known for his quite controversial stance on immigration, and specifically islam.
He believes that "the Islamic culture" is a long term threat to European civilization and that the current state of affairs; what he calls the "islamization" of the Netherlands and by extension of Europe cannot be allowed to continue. He believes that Europe is paralyzed by political correctness and cultural relativism, and needs to wake up to this supposed problem now - before it is too late, and our cultures vanish. He maintains however, that the vast majority of muslims are law abiding citizens, like "you and me".
That being his most controversial opinions, he (and by extension his party, in which he is the only real member) is sceptical against the EU, wants lower taxes, among other things.

For those of you who think my introduction is too simplistic, this should suffice - an interview with the german newspaper die spiegel;
http://www.spiegel.de/international/eur ... 78,00.html
11/09/2010

SPIEGEL Interview with Geert Wilders

'Merkel Is Afraid'

In a SPIEGEL interview, Dutch Islam-opponent Geert Wilders discusses his fight for a Koran ban, why German Chancellor Angela Merkel is running scared on the immigration issue and his belief that the Netherlands' debate over Muslims has now crossed the border into Germany.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Wilders, you are said to be the strong man behind the new Dutch government because the minority cabinet depends on your support in parliament. Why is your party, 65 years after the Holocaust, relying on outdated approaches -- on religious and racial exclusion?

Wilders: We do not support religious exclusion -- and certainly not racial exclusion. We have no problems with other skin colors, nor with Muslims -- our problem is with Islam. Indeed, we are expressing exactly what many of our compatriots feel. We became the third strongest party during the elections in June and are now, according to the most recent opinion polls, already the second strongest party in Holland.

SPIEGEL: What do you have against Islam?

Wilders: Europe's greatest problem -- not just today, but already for decades now -- is cultural relativism. This has led to a situation today where Europeans no longer know what they should be proud of and who they really are -- because a so-called liberal and leftist-imposed concept says that all cultures are the same.

SPIEGEL: The same or equal?

Wilders: It has to do with what is described by the wonderful German word Leitkultur, which means "dominant" or "guiding" culture. I think that we should be proud that our culture is better than Islamic culture, for instance. Anyone who says this is not a racist, Nazi or xenophobe. Those are labels that have been put on many people in the Netherlands, Germany and England -- just because we believe that Islam is a totalitarian and violent ideology. More of an ideology than a religion, comparable to communism and fascism. Islam threatens our freedom.

SPIEGEL: You maintain that Dutch culture is better than the culture of Islamic countries. Why do you consciously seize upon comparisons that degrade other religions?

Wilders: Anyone who compares the traditions of Judaism, Christianity and humanism with those of Islam doesn't have to be an Einstein to see the difference. Do you know of a country in the Middle East where Islamic culture prevails and where there is a genuine constitutional state and independent journalism? Where non-believers, women and gays can do what they want? In the West people have given their lives for the freedoms that we enjoy today.

SPIEGEL: You do not acknowledge that cultures and religions can be changed by people. Isn't that exactly how it was with the Catholic Church?

Wilders: Yes, but how long did it take? I am not saying that I want to ban Islam. I want less Islam in Europe -- because it doesn't allow any room for debate. By contrast, take Judaism and the life in the yeshivas: That is where they debate how the Talmud should be interpreted. With the Koran, however, anyone who does not believe every word is an infidel. And the punishment for that is well known: death.

SPIEGEL: You live around-the-clock with bodyguards and sleep in a heavily guarded residential complex owned by the government. When do you actually meet the people whose interests you claim to advocate?

Wilders: I take part in election campaigns. I show myself on the streets. That is nevertheless, admittedly, a strange sight: There are more police officers around me than you can count.

SPIEGEL: A costly burden for Dutch taxpayers.

Wilders: True. But the alternative would be that a democratically elected politician like myself, who has never threatened anyone with death, can no longer appear in public. In the struggle for the freedom of the Dutch people, I have lost my own freedom. I know that there can be no normal life for me, neither today nor tomorrow. But that is the price that has to be paid.

SPIEGEL: You are one of the most despised politicians in Europe. But in reality you love it when your arguments create a stir.

Wilders: People love or hate me; there is no gray area. My party and I are a threat to the political elite in many countries. But they will not stop us. Take a look at German Chancellor Angela Merkel who is now trying to create a copy.

SPIEGEL: A copy of your policies as you have just maintained, in all seriousness?

Wilders: Merkel is afraid -- because there are opinion polls which show that a charismatic figure, if one were to emerge in Germany as I have done in the Netherlands, could count on 20 percent of the vote. I mean a figure without a far right-wing background -- in other words, not from the Republikaner (REP) or the National Democratic Party (NPD). This represents a threat to the mainstream political parties, which is why they are now trying to copy us: Merkel has declared that the multicultural society has failed.

SPIEGEL: She also said that Islam belongs to Germany -- and that we need additional immigration.

Wilders: Yes, but I have never heard her say before that the multicultural society has failed. And the majority of Germans reject the statement by German President Christian Wulff that Islam is part of Germany. This means that what we have already witnessed here in Holland is now occurring in your country as well -- the political elite is in turmoil.

SPIEGEL: Who are you thinking of in particular?

Wilders: The head of Germany's conservative Christian Social Union (CSU), Horst Seehofer, not only says that the multicultural society is dead, but also that he wants no more Turkish and Arab immigrants. If I said the same thing in Holland, I would be taken to court. When I appeared in Berlin in October, nearly half of the German cabinet voiced their objections -- isn't that a sign that the elite there are rattled?

SPIEGEL: You compare the Koran with Hitler's "Mein Kampf." Have you read "Mein Kampf"?

Wilders: Yes, but not in its entirety. The Koran has, in any case, more anti-Jewish passages. In principle, these are concoctions with a totalitarian approach, which allows no room for other opinions. Fascism, communism and Islam adhere to the same principle.

SPIEGEL: Your own principle is apparently this: The more drastic the comparison, the more headlines it generates.

Wilders: I don't need headlines. For me, it's the truth that matters.

SPIEGEL: The truth is that you are dividing Dutch society: Here in The Hague, nearly half of the residents come from immigrant families, and many of them are Muslims. And you are calling for the Koran to be banned?

Wilders: "Mein Kampf" is banned in our country. But the Koran is worse in terms of inciting hatred and violence. If my left-wing friends were consistent, the Koran would have to be banned.

SPIEGEL: Are you familiar with this quote from the Prophet? "But these enemies of mine, who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slay them before me"?

Wilders: I have read many such passages.

SPIEGEL: The Prophet cited in this case was Jesus, from Luke, Chapter 19, Verse 27. Do you admit that there are also calls for violence in the Bible?

Wilders: There are brutal passages in the Old Testament; the New Testament takes a more moderate approach. But a key difference between Christianity and Islam is that Muslims believe that the Koran contains verbatim the word of God; it is written in the imperative. This precludes a comparison with Christianity.

SPIEGEL: You are familiar with Thilo Sarrazin's book. Do you share his opinion that there are genetic reasons for the "inferiority" of certain ethnic groups?

Wilders: I do not believe in genetic causes; I am miles away from there. I believe rather that all people who embrace our values, our laws and our constitution are full members of our society. I would even go so far as to say that the majority of the Muslims in Europe are people like you and I; they lead a normal life, have a normal occupation and want the best for their children. My problem is with the growing influence of an ideology that will cost us our freedom.

SPIEGEL: Do you see a German Geert Wilders on the horizon?

Wilders: I was recently in Berlin on an invitation from René Stadtkewitz ...

SPIEGEL: ... a former member of the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) who is also calling for another integration policy and recently founded a party called Die Freiheit (The Freedom Party), which virtually nobody in Germany has ever heard of.

Wilders: That may be true, but the main thing for me is that I want to have absolutely nothing to do with far right-wing parties like the German Republikaner, Jean-Marie Le Pen's Front National in France and the British National Party.

SPIEGEL: You disassociate yourself from their die-hard slogans, but agree with them when it comes to aggressively wooing the votes of the hard-working middle class?

Wilders: We want to have nothing to do with these far right-wing parties. Indeed, following our success in the European Union elections, we have joined no faction in the European Parliament. Ask our political opponents in the Netherlands: They may not share our opinions, but they do not all maintain that Wilders and his people are extremists. Anyone who labels 2 million Dutch as extremists does not insult me, but rather the voters.
SPIEGEL: You say that you are not an extremist. And yet, at the same time, you have called for an annual €1,000 "head rag tax" for women who wear headscarves?

Wilders: I was not able to win over a majority in parliament for this. I am interested in the big picture, but again and again it is this proposal that is picked out in public.

SPIEGEL: Was the whole "head rag tax" business a bad joke?

Wilders: No, not a joke, just one proposal among others. Don't forget, we support a minority government which would not be in power without us. And this means that there will soon be a ban in Holland on wearing the burqa and an enormous reduction in immigration. We are very successful.

SPIEGEL: What will happen to the Dutch Muslims? Those who refuse to adapt will be sent back in the future?

Wilders: No, not sent back -- unless they are criminals.

SPIEGEL: The new Dutch minister for immigration, Christian Democrat Gerd Leers, fairly recently referred to you as the "embodiment of common Internet muckrakers." Have you confronted him about this?

Wilders: If I did not speak with people who call me names, I could not engage in politics. I had a good conversation with him. I am interested in the results that this coalition government can achieve with our support -- I see this from a purely business perspective. If the government keeps its promises, that's good. If not, the government will have a problem.

SPIEGEL: Aren't you sometimes ashamed of the hatred that you sow?

Wilders: I don't sow hatred. I only use the democratic options in parliament.

SPIEGEL: That's what the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) claimed when they joined a coalition government in Vienna 10 years ago. EU sanctions were the result. Nothing comparable has happened in Sweden, Denmark or the Netherlands. It seems as if right-wing populism has become socially acceptable in Europe.

Wilders: The EU would do well to get used to the idea. My party will not be the last to emerge here. The Danish People's Party has supported a minority government for the past nine years, and no one in Europe is complaining about it.

SPIEGEL: You have vehemently spoken out against Turkey joining the EU. How does the Dutch government view the pre-accession process leading to EU membership for the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, which both have large Muslim populations?

Wilders: This is dealt with in the coalition agreement. But my party rejects any form of EU expansion. We will vote against all additional candidates, including Croatia. In this case, the government will have to seek its majority elsewhere. Above all, we will vote against accepting Turkey -- a neighbor, yes; a member of the family, no. If it were not for the army, the Islamists would rule with no counterbalance thanks to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's party. And some day we would have a Trojan Islamic horse in the EU -- and an external border with criminal states like Syria and Iran.

SPIEGEL: That is something that never existed before Geert Wilders arrived: a one-man party that has a say in the fortunes of an EU member state. You are the only member, the party chairman, parliamentary floor leader, chief ideologist and treasurer of the Freedom Party (PVV), which you founded. Will things stay that way?

Wilders: We will soon discuss within the parliamentary faction whether we should accept additional party members. The idea is to keep the wrong people from holding our party hostage.

SPIEGEL: Isn't it really the case that your party is fighting the wrong battle -- in the name of a Western civilization that is noticeably suffering from an aging population, demographic decline and disaffection with political parties?

Wilders: The demographic development is in fact negative. I read the other day that in England last year the most commonly chosen first name for a boy was Mohammed. I have nothing against Muslim babies. But if Mohammed is now the new favorite name of the English, we have a problem. Europe has to rise up and, with united forces, tell the Islamic world: Enough is enough, we will defend ourselves with democratic means.

SPIEGEL: Mr. Wilders, we thank you for this interview.

Interview conducted by Walter Mayr and René Pfister. Translated from the German by Paul Cohen.


The only major problem I have with his policies is his negative attitude towards deeper European integration.
Apart from that, I think he's a hero.
Thoughts?
Last edited by Aiestonia on Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163897
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:58 am

Cheap populism employed to further xenophobia and racism, so far as I can see.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:03 am

Ifreann wrote:Cheap populism employed to further xenophobia and racism, so far as I can see.


Populism, definately.
Xenophobia, that's at least a defendable claim, yes.
Racism? Not so much.
The man has never mentioned race as a motivation, once, and he takes pains to distance himself from "Right wing extremists" like the BNP, Le Front National, FPÖ in Austria, etc.
Last edited by Aiestonia on Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sun Aut Ex
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5402
Founded: Nov 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Aut Ex » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:05 am

Very, very pro-him.
Strykyh wrote:I wasn't trying to be intelligent.

Keronians wrote:
So you think it's ok to waste valuable police time and resources to pander to minority superstitions?

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about ten minutes, I have to go to ID a Muslim woman."


Yes.

Unless of course it's not OK for a woman to ask for a female to ask for a female officer to carry out body checks. In which case, the answer would be no.

"All available officers, report downtown, armed suspected firing wildly into the public."
"I'll be about then minutes, I have to go to carry out a body check on a woman."

User avatar
Dawood kidwai
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Sep 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Dawood kidwai » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:09 am

he is bigot,racist,xenophobic..etc etc....i dont know how peolple like wilders become a politician..eww

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Tagmatium » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:11 am

Love how he quotes that Daily Fail fake news story about the Mohammed being the most popular name child's name in Britain.

Who needs fact when you're stirring up hate?
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Corsae
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Oct 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Corsae » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:12 am

Ifreann wrote:Cheap populism employed to further xenophobia and racism, so far as I can see.


I'm Flemish and I follow Dutch politics too now and then so I can only second that citation. In Flanders we have a similar extreme right party called 'Vlaams Belang' (Flemish Interest), which has lost a lot of votes during the last two years' elections. They wish to increase their popularity too by making 'the threat of islam/islamisation' their new theme next to immigration and safety, which in the past were their only main topics during their political campaigns. It's graving that politicians really use fear and populism to become elected (at the other hand, it's always been that way ...).

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:18 am

Dawood kidwai wrote:he is bigot,racist,xenophobic..etc etc....i dont know how peolple like wilders become a politician..eww


Back up claims of his racism?
As for bigoted, he does admit that most muslims are law abiding, "normal" citizens.

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:19 am

Tagmatium wrote:Love how he quotes that Daily Fail fake news story about the Mohammed being the most popular name child's name in Britain.

Who needs fact when you're stirring up hate?


But they included all the different froms of the name mohammed, didn't they? As in muhammed, mohammed, muhammad, etc. - wasn't that stated quite clearly in the article (as in past the headline).
Or was that also false?

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:24 am

As for xenophobia - why does dislike for forgeigners, foreign things and customs always stem from irrationality in the minds of most leftists...?

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:25 am

He's a hating hater. "Party for Freedom" my arse.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163897
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:31 am

Aiestonia wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Love how he quotes that Daily Fail fake news story about the Mohammed being the most popular name child's name in Britain.

Who needs fact when you're stirring up hate?


But they included all the different froms of the name mohammed, didn't they? As in muhammed, mohammed, muhammad, etc. - wasn't that stated quite clearly in the article (as in past the headline).
Or was that also false?

Which would mean that "Mohammed most popular name in Britain" isn't true. Makes you wonder why they felt the need to manipulate the statistics.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Respublika Goroda
Envoy
 
Posts: 214
Founded: Sep 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Respublika Goroda » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:32 am

Aiestonia wrote:As for xenophobia - why does dislike for forgeigners, foreign things and customs always stem from irrationality in the minds of most leftists...?


My God, why shouldn't it?
Eireann Fae wrote:"I'M GONNA BLOW UP THIS AIRPORT!"

RP population is 5 million.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163897
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:33 am

Aiestonia wrote:As for xenophobia - why does dislike for forgeigners, foreign things and customs always stem from irrationality in the minds of most leftists...?

I'd think it was rather obvious. Disliking something simply because it's foreign, rather than judging it on its merits, is irrational.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Schwabenreich
Minister
 
Posts: 2259
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Schwabenreich » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:35 am

He sounds silly, and a voice in my head screamed Türkiye at this line. Azerbaijan works too.

Wilders: Anyone who compares the traditions of Judaism, Christianity and humanism with those of Islam doesn't have to be an Einstein to see the difference. Do you know of a country in the Middle East where Islamic culture prevails and where there is a genuine constitutional state and independent journalism? Where non-believers, women and gays can do what they want? In the West people have given their lives for the freedoms that we enjoy today.

I would say Albania too but it is not in the Middle East.

Although I do approve of his pride in his own culture, and do not think it is inherently bad to show favoritism of the culture of locals over that of immigrants, I do not think the culture of predominately islamic peoples is what he quite makes it out to be (inferior) nor do I think the faith itself is a totalitarian ideology, though certainly by the quran it could be taken this way, so could other Abrahamic faiths. His "Just like you or me" line seems more like something he conceded to get people off his back.
Last edited by Schwabenreich on Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
"The sovereign represents the state; he and his people form but one body, which can only be happy as far as united by concord. The prince is to a nation he governs, what a head is to a man; it is his duty to see, think and act for the whole community, that he may procure it every advantage of which it is capable."-Friedrich der Große

User avatar
Eireann Fae
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Eireann Fae » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:35 am

Respublika Goroda wrote:
Aiestonia wrote:As for xenophobia - why does dislike for forgeigners, foreign things and customs always stem from irrationality in the minds of most leftists...?


My God, why shouldn't it?


That is pretty troubling... that this cat doesn't even know it's a problem ;x

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:40 am

Ifreann wrote:
Aiestonia wrote:As for xenophobia - why does dislike for forgeigners, foreign things and customs always stem from irrationality in the minds of most leftists...?

I'd think it was rather obvious. Disliking something simply because it's foreign, rather than judging it on its merits, is irrational.


I'm not questioning why xenophobes and xenophobia are considered xenophobic.
What annoys me is the unsaid assumption the pc crows has that people disliking foreign influences are always doing it out of xenophobia.
For example, 60% of all Germans agree with Thilo Sarazzin's main thesis in the book he published a while back (http://www.news24.com/World/News/Anti-M ... y-20100930) - ergo, 60% of the German population are racist xenophobes?

This sentiment is too widespread, and there's too much statistical evidence to dismiss it as simple xenophobia.
Last edited by Aiestonia on Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Schwabenreich
Minister
 
Posts: 2259
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Schwabenreich » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 am

Aiestonia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I'd think it was rather obvious. Disliking something simply because it's foreign, rather than judging it on its merits, is irrational.


I'm not questioning why xenophobes and xenophobia are considered xenophobic.
What annoys me is the unsaid assumption the pc crows has that people disliking foreign influences are always doing it out of xenophobia.
For example, 60% of all Germans agree with Thilo Sarazzin's main thesis in the book he published a while back (http://www.news24.com/World/News/Anti-M ... y-20100930) - ergo, 60% of the German population are racist xenophobes?

This sentiment is too widespread, and there's too much statistical evidence to dismiss it as simple xenophobia.


Sounds like a little culture shock to me.
Last edited by Schwabenreich on Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The sovereign represents the state; he and his people form but one body, which can only be happy as far as united by concord. The prince is to a nation he governs, what a head is to a man; it is his duty to see, think and act for the whole community, that he may procure it every advantage of which it is capable."-Friedrich der Große

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:46 am

Aiestonia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I'd think it was rather obvious. Disliking something simply because it's foreign, rather than judging it on its merits, is irrational.


I'm not questioning why xenophobes and xenophobia are considered xenophobic.
What annoys me is the unsaid assumption the pc crows has that people disliking foreign influences are always doing it out of xenophobia.
For example, 60% of all Germans agree with Thilo Sarazzin's main thesis in the book he published a while back (http://www.news24.com/World/News/Anti-M ... y-20100930) - ergo, 60% of the German population are racist xenophobes?

Yes.

This sentiment is too widespread, and there's too much statistical evidence to dismiss it as simple xenophobia.

Yeah, uh, "it's not xenophobia because everyone has it" is stupid enough. When you're talking about fucking Germany of all places, well.
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:49 am

Schwabenreich wrote:He sounds silly, and a voice in my head screamed Türkiye at this line. Azerbaijan works too.

Wilders: Anyone who compares the traditions of Judaism, Christianity and humanism with those of Islam doesn't have to be an Einstein to see the difference. Do you know of a country in the Middle East where Islamic culture prevails and where there is a genuine constitutional state and independent journalism? Where non-believers, women and gays can do what they want? In the West people have given their lives for the freedoms that we enjoy today.

I would say Albania too but it is not in the Middle East.

Although I do approve of his pride in his own culture, and do not think it is inherently bad to show favoritism of the culture of locals over that of immigrants, I do not think the culture of predominately islamic peoples is what he quite makes it out to be (inferior) nor do I think the faith itself is a totalitarian ideology, though certainly by the quran it could be taken this way, so could other Abrahamic faiths. His "Just like you or me" line seems more like something he conceded to get people off his back.


Azerbaijan was a part of the USSR which has probalby hurt islamist sentiment somewhat.
As for Turkey...
Turkey is a state that went through a babtism of fire when it was born. The founder of modern Turkey, Atatürk, quite famously compared Islam to a rotten corpse. Todays Turkey might be secular - but for how long? The current prime minister recited a poem back in the nineties (for which he did prisontime) including such beautiful verses as "The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers....". If someone would say something similiar today, they might not go to jail.
Had it been a western leader saying similiar things... well we both know that would never have happened.

The overall pattern can't exactly be denied, Islamic countries are overall less develeoped, less free, and much less secular than their western counterparts. Is this just a coincidence?

User avatar
Yohannes
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13162
Founded: Mar 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Yohannes » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:54 am

Aiestonia wrote:
Schwabenreich wrote:He sounds silly, and a voice in my head screamed Türkiye at this line. Azerbaijan works too.

Wilders: Anyone who compares the traditions of Judaism, Christianity and humanism with those of Islam doesn't have to be an Einstein to see the difference. Do you know of a country in the Middle East where Islamic culture prevails and where there is a genuine constitutional state and independent journalism? Where non-believers, women and gays can do what they want? In the West people have given their lives for the freedoms that we enjoy today.

I would say Albania too but it is not in the Middle East.

Although I do approve of his pride in his own culture, and do not think it is inherently bad to show favoritism of the culture of locals over that of immigrants, I do not think the culture of predominately islamic peoples is what he quite makes it out to be (inferior) nor do I think the faith itself is a totalitarian ideology, though certainly by the quran it could be taken this way, so could other Abrahamic faiths. His "Just like you or me" line seems more like something he conceded to get people off his back.


Azerbaijan was a part of the USSR which has probalby hurt islamist sentiment somewhat.
As for Turkey...
Turkey is a state that went through a babtism of fire when it was born. The founder of modern Turkey, Atatürk, quite famously compared Islam to a rotten corpse. Todays Turkey might be secular - but for how long? The current prime minister recited a poem back in the nineties (for which he did prisontime) including such beautiful verses as "The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers....". If someone would say something similiar today, they might not go to jail.
Had it been a western leader saying similiar things... well we both know that would never have happened.

The overall pattern can't exactly be denied, Islamic countries are overall less develeoped, less free, and much less secular than their western counterparts. Is this just a coincidence?


No, it is not a coincidence.

PRC = non-Muslim majority. 2nd largest economy globally
DPJ = non-muslim majority. 3rd (or perhaps 4th) largest economy globally

All are non-western culture, yet nom-islamic as well.

Xenophobic and Radicalist Islamic Majority = Non-Developed Nations
The Pink Diary | Financial Diary | Embassy Exchange | Main Characters
The Archbishop and His Mission | Adrian Goldwert’s Yohannesian Peace | ISEC | Retired Storytelling Account
Currency | HASF Materials | Bank of Yohannes | SC Resolution # 237 | #teamnana | Posts | Views
Retired II RP Mentor | Yohannes’ [ National Flag ] | Commended WA Nation
♚ Moving to a new nation not because I "wish to move on from past events," but because I'm bored writing about a fictional large nation on NS. Can online personalities with too much time on their hands stop spreading unfounded rumours about this online boy?? XOXO ♚

User avatar
Aiestonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 396
Founded: Dec 04, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Aiestonia » Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:54 am

Xsyne wrote:
Aiestonia wrote:
I'm not questioning why xenophobes and xenophobia are considered xenophobic.
What annoys me is the unsaid assumption the pc crows has that people disliking foreign influences are always doing it out of xenophobia.
For example, 60% of all Germans agree with Thilo Sarazzin's main thesis in the book he published a while back (http://www.news24.com/World/News/Anti-M ... y-20100930) - ergo, 60% of the German population are racist xenophobes?

Yes.

This sentiment is too widespread, and there's too much statistical evidence to dismiss it as simple xenophobia.

Yeah, uh, "it's not xenophobia because everyone has it" is stupid enough. When you're talking about fucking Germany of all places, well.


That's just brilliant.
So it's completely impossible to dislike foreign things for another reason than them being foreign? :eyebrow:
And oh yeah - only 13 % disagreed. So, 13 % of the German population are the only ones with brains then...
Even Hitler didn't enjoy that widespread support in his heyday.

Germany is among the most politically correct nations in the world. They have a president who recently claimed that "Islam is an integral part of Germany", a media that defiantely doesn't share this hostility to foreigners and foreign things... If now, Islamic immigration would not be costing the country (not only in material terms) isn't it reasonable to assume that slightly more than 13 % would disagree with Monsieur Sarrazin?
Last edited by Aiestonia on Wed Nov 10, 2010 6:57 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Schwabenreich
Minister
 
Posts: 2259
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Schwabenreich » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:00 am

Aiestonia wrote:
Schwabenreich wrote:He sounds silly, and a voice in my head screamed Türkiye at this line. Azerbaijan works too.

Wilders: Anyone who compares the traditions of Judaism, Christianity and humanism with those of Islam doesn't have to be an Einstein to see the difference. Do you know of a country in the Middle East where Islamic culture prevails and where there is a genuine constitutional state and independent journalism? Where non-believers, women and gays can do what they want? In the West people have given their lives for the freedoms that we enjoy today.

I would say Albania too but it is not in the Middle East.

Although I do approve of his pride in his own culture, and do not think it is inherently bad to show favoritism of the culture of locals over that of immigrants, I do not think the culture of predominately islamic peoples is what he quite makes it out to be (inferior) nor do I think the faith itself is a totalitarian ideology, though certainly by the quran it could be taken this way, so could other Abrahamic faiths. His "Just like you or me" line seems more like something he conceded to get people off his back.


Azerbaijan was a part of the USSR which has probalby hurt islamist sentiment somewhat.
As for Turkey...
Turkey is a state that went through a babtism of fire when it was born. The founder of modern Turkey, Atatürk, quite famously compared Islam to a rotten corpse. Todays Turkey might be secular - but for how long? The current prime minister recited a poem back in the nineties (for which he did prisontime) including such beautiful verses as "The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers....". If someone would say something similiar today, they might not go to jail.
Had it been a western leader saying similiar things... well we both know that would never have happened.

The overall pattern can't exactly be denied, Islamic countries are overall less develeoped, less free, and much less secular than their western counterparts. Is this just a coincidence?


Well said, however, I do not think blaming the USSR and bringing up Türkiye's history and nationalist sentiment entirely invalidates it as an example of a Middle Eastern Islamic state with a genuine constitution, secular government, independent journalism and religious and civil freedoms. I do not think a western leader would go to 'jail' for expressing the same sentiment, as the privelege of free speech is generally held close to heart in Europe, whether constitutionally guranateed or not.

It is important to remember that the Islamic world was leading in humanism and tolerance long before Europe, They're jihads never matched up to the European crusades, and Ottoman Tolerance was infamous, the tax on religious immigrants to Islam was much more lenient then the rampant hangings, oppression, slavery and other mistreatment of Islamic peoples in the Christian world. It is perhaps easier to blame the current state of the Islamic areas on the intevention of European powers, for example their attempt to occupy, colonise or control islamic nations as well as their hand in vicitmising the Ottoman Empire into collapse.

Any criticism against the Islamic faith, could be say, made towards the old testament, therefor all the main abrahamic faiths, even Christianity and Judaism isn't free of such sentiments. If one is subjective in their readings the same extremes of islamic faith could easily be reached through the bible or the Torah. The islamic world has been a bit riled up by the USSR, the British Empire and the American (Well western world in general's) culture's pervasive spread. Its kind of natural that they'd hold on to their faith like a sword.

Never mind that the Islamic environment didn't exactly lend itself to the competetive trend that gave Europe its edge in technology. It was spacious and had barren lands inbetween resources, its harder to motivate a people to progress technology when they're not scrambling over a few kms for every valuable resource or trade good.
Last edited by Schwabenreich on Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:03 am, edited 2 times in total.
"The sovereign represents the state; he and his people form but one body, which can only be happy as far as united by concord. The prince is to a nation he governs, what a head is to a man; it is his duty to see, think and act for the whole community, that he may procure it every advantage of which it is capable."-Friedrich der Große

User avatar
Consortina
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 118
Founded: Nov 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Consortina » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:03 am

Schwabenreich wrote:Wilders: Anyone who compares the traditions of Judaism, Christianity and humanism with those of Islam doesn't have to be an Einstein to see the difference. Do you know of a country in the Middle East where Islamic culture prevails and where there is a genuine constitutional state and independent journalism? Where non-believers, women and gays can do what they want? In the West people have given their lives for the freedoms that we enjoy today.


IMO this sentence alone instantly disqualifies him from a historic debate. The Middle East has a rich cultural history and in the Middle Ages was far superior to Europe in terms of citizen rights and religious freedom. And if they had not put up ferocious resistance against Mongolian invaders in the 13th century, Europe would have certainly been overrun by the empire of Gengis Khan (we were just lucky that they fell apart from the inside just before they reached central Europe). Turkey has resisted influence from the Allied forces of WWI to create and independet state. Thousands of Afghanistan's pople have given their life to shake off Soviet oppression. The Muslim reign in Spain was far from a reign of terror and it allowed - in most places - a coexistence of religions.
Until the 20th century, the Sharia was taken about as seriously as the laws of Leviticus. Unfortunately, that was about the point when the radicals took over in the governments and muslim sects. The involvement in the Cold War and the foundation of Israel that was not negotiated with the neighbouring states have certainly contributed.
Yes, the state of the Muslim world is pretty bad right now. But it hasn't always been that way and it doesn't need to be that way forever.

Concerning Wilders - his death was tragic and his murderer did a horrible crime against an innocent person as well as a horrible disservice for those he considered to be "his" people. It doesn't make me agree more or less with his views, though.

Concerning the German Poll: It pretty much shows the lunacy going on. The highest values (up to 74%) for Anti-Muslim sentiments are found in East Germany - the region of Germany where the Muslim population amounts to about 0,5%.

User avatar
Schwabenreich
Minister
 
Posts: 2259
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Schwabenreich » Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:04 am

Aiestonia wrote:
Xsyne wrote:Yes.


Yeah, uh, "it's not xenophobia because everyone has it" is stupid enough. When you're talking about fucking Germany of all places, well.


That's just brilliant.
So it's completely impossible to dislike foreign things for another reason than them being foreign? :eyebrow:
And oh yeah - only 13 % disagreed. So, 13 % of the German population are the only ones with brains then...
Even Hitler didn't enjoy that widespread support in his heyday.

Germany is among the most politically correct nations in the world. They have a president who recently claimed that "Islam is an integral part of Germany", a media that defiantely doesn't share this hostility to foreigners and foreign things... If now, Islamic immigration would not be costing the country (not only in material terms) isn't it reasonable to assume that slightly more than 13 % would disagree with Monsieur Sarrazin?


I totally fricken agree here.
"The sovereign represents the state; he and his people form but one body, which can only be happy as far as united by concord. The prince is to a nation he governs, what a head is to a man; it is his duty to see, think and act for the whole community, that he may procure it every advantage of which it is capable."-Friedrich der Große

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Doc Scratch, East Owenistan, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ineva, Kannap, Lans Isles, Stellar Colonies, Tarsonis, TescoPepsi, The Black Forrest, Tricorniolis, Tungstan, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads