Advertisement

by Kyronea » Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:33 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:52 am
Jocabia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Wah. Get a tissue.
Uh huh.
So, merely pointing out that you're making specific, personal attacks, on me as an individual - earns a sensitive "Wah" response... but suggesting that collectively, people buy expensive-looking, sporty cars (that are sold as sex symbols) because they're trying to promote some kind of sexual image they otherwise do not feel is pronounced enough... earns a half a page of ranting and denial.
Hypocrisy, thy name is "Cannot think of a name".
You totally could have done better with that last line. I'm terribly disappointed.
You do realize that if buying a car specifically for the name and that people would associate it to sex is pathetic, then avoiding it for the same reason would be equally pathetic, right?
In your rants about expensive cars, you seem to ignore when cars by the same name aren't (as in $900). It seems your problem isn't that they're expensive, but that they carry the name. If you were really trying to be rational, you would be talking about value. You aren't.


by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:54 am
Potarius wrote:Jocabia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:You know why the "sports car = compensating" cliche IS a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread.
You know why the "black people=criminals" cliche is a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread. Does that make it valid?
I don't think it's of much use to argue with him, being the same person who tried to convince me that I should be open to having anal sex because he'd heard that other people liked it.
Never mind the fact that I simply find even the thought of it disgusting.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:59 am
Jocabia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:You know why the "sports car = compensating" cliche IS a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread.
You know why the "black people=criminals" cliche is a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread. Does that make it valid?

by Maurepas » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:01 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Potarius wrote:
I don't think it's of much use to argue with him, being the same person who tried to convince me that I should be open to having anal sex because he'd heard that other people liked it.
Never mind the fact that I simply find even the thought of it disgusting.
Meanwhile, on planet WTF...?

by Kyronea » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:37 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Applying the parallel, some people that have sports cars must be compensating for a failing in the underwear department, and a given sportscar owner is liekly to be statistically significantly under endowed.

by The Black Forrest » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:17 pm

by Lunatic Goofballs » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:24 pm
Kyronea wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Applying the parallel, some people that have sports cars must be compensating for a failing in the underwear department, and a given sportscar owner is liekly to be statistically significantly under endowed.
As opposed to just feeling like they are?
That's actually the case, most of the time, with penis issues. Few men take the time to compare themselves to many other men, so without that basis for comparison, all they're left with is their feeling of inadequacy.

by New Ziedrich » Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:19 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Maybe they should be measured at the DMV and the measurements appear on people's driver's licenses.


by Dinaverg » Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:57 pm
Potarius wrote:Jocabia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:You know why the "sports car = compensating" cliche IS a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread.
You know why the "black people=criminals" cliche is a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread. Does that make it valid?
I don't think it's of much use to argue with him, being the same person who tried to convince me that I should be open to having anal sex because he'd heard that other people liked it.
Never mind the fact that I simply find even the thought of it disgusting.


by Neu Leonstein » Sat Jul 18, 2009 4:01 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Didn't Porsche pull a fast one on some hedge funds?
A guy was telling me a couple hedge funds decided they were invincible and decided to run puts on VW. Not nowing VW had a deal with Porsche on shares. Porsche executed their options and wiped out the funds with the stock value increase.....
In order to reach a decision, the Porsche and Piech families had to settle on a future strategy. Porsche's supervisory board chairman, Wolfgang Porsche, wants to preserve the autonomy of the sports car manufacturer.

by Kusatsu » Sat Jul 18, 2009 4:05 pm


by German Nightmare » Sat Jul 18, 2009 5:22 pm
Kusatsu wrote:I ride a bike. I also walk. I don't drive cars.
Tell me when the luxury bike and shoe manufacturing companies are going out of business and I might care a little.

by Potarius » Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:33 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:Potarius wrote:I don't think it's of much use to argue with him, being the same person who tried to convince me that I should be open to having anal sex because he'd heard that other people liked it.
Never mind the fact that I simply find even the thought of it disgusting.
Meanwhile, on planet WTF...?

by Potarius » Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:35 pm
Dinaverg wrote:'I'm the best'? Really?

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:50 pm
Potarius wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:Potarius wrote:I don't think it's of much use to argue with him, being the same person who tried to convince me that I should be open to having anal sex because he'd heard that other people liked it.
Never mind the fact that I simply find even the thought of it disgusting.
Meanwhile, on planet WTF...?
Mwahahaha. I'm guessing you don't remember that thread (that has since been deleted, I assume).

by Pope Joan » Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:12 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Porsche and Volkswagen have always been closely related, I don't see yet another slight shuffle of that relationship as equaling "the end of Porsche." Maybe we'll get something like the 914 again, which for a while was their best selling model. Porsche makes most of its money of engineering consulting.

by Neu Leonstein » Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:23 pm
Pope Joan wrote:I had the earlier crap 76 engine, not the porsche one. It would only go 40 mph, so I was fined for going too slow on the interstate.

by Pope Joan » Sat Jul 18, 2009 9:31 pm
Neu Leonstein wrote:Pope Joan wrote:I had the earlier crap 76 engine, not the porsche one. It would only go 40 mph, so I was fined for going too slow on the interstate.
Solution!

by Jocabia » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:43 am
Grave_n_idle wrote:Jocabia wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:You know why the "sports car = compensating" cliche IS a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread.
You know why the "black people=criminals" cliche is a cliche? Because I didn't just come up with it to piss people off in this thread. Does that make it valid?
Some black people are criminals.
Also - judging by the following: "1.As of June 30, 2007, the incarceration rate in state or federal prison or jail for men was 1,406 per 100,000 residents, for women 136 per 100,000 residents. The rate for white men was 773 per 100,000, for black men 4,618 per 100,000, for Hispanic men 1,747 per 100,000. The rate for white women was 95 per 100,000, for black women 348 per 100,000, and for Hispanic women 146 per 100,000..." a given criminal is statistically significantly more likely to be a black male.
(http://drugwarfacts.org/cms/?q=node/64)
Applying the parallel, some people that have sports cars must be compensating for a failing in the underwear department, and a given sportscar owner is liekly to be statistically significantly under endowed.

by Risottia » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:37 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm having difficulty caring about the fate of Porshe. I am willing to keep an open mind however if anybody can convince me that Porshe automobiles are anything more than overvalued cult objects.

by Risottia » Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:50 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arval Va, Bovad, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, EuroStralia, Greater Siamese State, Haganham, Hispida, Kubra, Lezviya, New Ciencia, New Temecula, Norse Inuit Union, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Quasi-Stellar Star Civilizations, Southland, The Pirateariat, Vrbo, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement